Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well this is good news but I certainly hope the "savings" is not passed on to the consumer. Apple is famous for making the consumer pay if they have to pay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jason83
swift.jpg

 
Last edited:
That was a Swift response. :)

Actually, I think this will be good for AAPL. Cash-starved competitors will have trouble matching that investment. And, in the steady state, this should have negligible impact on revenue.
 
Eddy just called her bluff. Let's see if Taylor does the honorable thing.

She's retweeted it. But Taylor Swift wouldn't have the power to decide whether it goes on Apple Music or not.

She wouldn't have the rights to her music... She wouldn't have any sway with the guys at Big Machine that receive the royalty checks...
 
If only if the Brian Jonestown Massacre guy hadn't tweeted his message to the wrong Twitter account, he could have changed Apple's mind two days earlier! What a pity.
 
So Apple caves. Why go down this path in the first place if you're going to cave so easily? Makes me think there was much bigger outcry than Taylor Swift and some indie labels/bands. Eddy Cue must have been getting an earful behind the scenes. So when does Tim Cook dock his pay for incompetence?
 
That was a Swift response. :)

Actually, I think this will be good for AAPL. Cash-starved competitors will have trouble matching that investment. And, in the steady state, this should have negligible impact on revenue.

This.

Honestly, Apple is coming out looking like the good guys.
I kind of wish they didn't do this. Apple needs to be the dictator here

Like the dictator IBM was in the Apple ad?

lol

This honestly couldn't have been better for Apple

- Taylor Swift basically just advertised Apple Music
- Taylor Swift will probably now be on Apple Music (and still not on Spotify)
- Apple is still going to come out of this looking like the good guy
- Spotify is still going to come out of this looking like an old relic which doesn't care
- Apple can take the loss (putting into perspective their bank, this is like a cent
- Now everyone knows about Apple Music

But seriously...I just realized that in the end, this really isn't about any one side, Apple Music got exposure...and there's never bad exposure.
 
*Attempts to decode post.*
So are you trying to say they were planning on paying them all along and were just waiting for people to get bothered by expecting to not be paid? If so, I wouldn't be surprised if they did that.

Tim Cook: Customers will never leave Pandora / Spotify to test Apple Music.

Eddy Cue: What if we give them a free trial month?

Tim Cook: great idea! but if we give them three months they'll be so comfortable with the service that they'll never want to give it up.

Ghost of Steve Jobs: That will cost us billions you fools *upsides head* screw the artists, don't pay them through the trial, they'll be millionaires six months down the road anyway.
 
Torrenting music in 2015 is pathetic, not this. For $9.99 (Spotify) you can basically listen to everything you want, and save songs offline.

Is this post even serious? Admitting to piracy on a public forum? Jesus, time to go back to lurking.

Spotify doesn't have "everything". Not even Swift!

I already subscribe to Pandora which still has a cap on the amount of songs I can skip. Even paying still screws you.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.