I've been thinking about replacing my 5 year old 39" 4k with a 32" 4k and a 27" 4k turned 90 degrees.
I'd pluck for a 32" 6k instead of a 4k if it's competitive, but if they did a ~42" 6k I'd buy that alone almost regardless of price.
Unless something changes in how macOS does UI scaling, it's almost certainly 31/32" if it's 6k horizontal resolution, due to the PPI that represents. This would result in a "looks like" resolution of 3072 x 1536 (I've worked on 6144x3072 as the raw resolution), at almost exactly the same visual size as the 4K and 5K iMacs.
[doublepost=1551876673][/doublepost]To get current PPI levels at 42", it'd need to be some variant of 8K.