it's not the thickness or size that matters, it's the weight
do not make it thinner, make it lighter
It's kind of all tied together though.
the more volume the device has, the more battery they can fit in. THe more battery they can fit in, the more weight they will have.
so it's a trade off. The smaller and lighter an object, the smaller and lighter the battery.
if you're just going to a make a device thicker, but leave all that space empty, it's just a poor use of space that can be used to create an extra benefit, as bigger batteries can improve battery life dramatically.
[doublepost=1516918349][/doublepost]
Well, didn't Coke bring back Coke Classic?
Coke brought back CocaCola Classic because the change hurt them financial as people stopped drinking coke.
Unless people stop purchasing Apple products as a message to the board, Nothing will be re-added as they've proven that removing magsafe wasn't enough to hurt them.
its PURELY about money.
[doublepost=1516918684][/doublepost]
It's 2018! No new devices should include the old USB type A ports! The industry needs to move on and there's nothing stopping you from buying a USB type A to type C converter for your old stuff.
So the universal standard port of USB-A that exists on virtuallly every consumer, enterprise and even some really bizarre uses like factory equipment today should just be... cut off at the knees because... Apple said so?
the USB-A port (aside from thunderbolt where available) provides identical bandwithc and capabilities as the USB-C port.
I love the USB-C port. It WILL replace USB-A. but right now, while everyone is using USB-A as the absolute standard, a device without USB-A is going to have inherent flaw of needing adapters and dongles to be as useful as a device with a mix.
Apple could have EASILY put a single USB-A port on the new MacBook Pro. Considering that on the lower end models, the USB-C ports on one side don't have enough PCI-E lanes for full THunderbolt anyways, the requirement of all USB-C was absolutely a business decision and NOT a practical one. IN your day to day life around the house, you might be fine going out and replacing all your USB-A chords and dveices with USB-C one, But tell enterprises that with millions of dollars in server infrastructure that uses, guess what, USB-A that their ports are obsolete and should replace all their hardware just to be compatible with your laptop
The industry will move on. When it's ready. first you provide devices that offer BOTH options so that there's a bridge period. And when people realize the convenience of the new port and devices, they'll move on their own. will it be oven right? no, but most of the time in technology, it isn't overnight and can take years to happen.
Apple wants to push faster because it's financially beneficial to them. not because it's better fro the industry as a whole right now.
The big problem with USB-C that many do have is that, without THunderbolt 3 and reversability,, USB-C doesn't actually offer any benefits over USB-A as they are both capable of carrying (at least currently) the same USB-3.1 standards.