What scandal?
Your understanding of what happened is out of date.
What scandal?
There is nothing to reason about. If you do something to someone, it's normal/polite/reasonable to inform him, in advance, about doing so
Your understanding of what happened is out of date.
I am not a lawyer - but can this become a first amendment case?
Two years. Two years ago he was first notified about this. How is that not advance warning?
No, he was not informed. They were two developer accounts with two email addresses. To me it does not matter if they were linked by the same credit card. I pay apps for my family, does it make me linked and responsible for my relatives' actions? Should my app store account be deleted when they do something wrong, without contacting ME ?
Wow listening to this is seems that apple gave him every possible chance to distance him from this and clear up his good reputation. I don't know anything about this app developer or his product but seems he is trying to make himself out to be a victim of big bad apple. Who know he may be but again it seems by listening to the audio they we're trying to give him a way to save face and a way back in. JMHO
So his sister, who he bought the account for, and who spent those two years making fake reviews on just happened not to mention the communication? How gullible do you have to be to believe that?
One can only speculate about what is their relationship like. I know quite a few people who stopped talking to each other for years, so what?
So they stopped talking but she continued to make 1000 fake reviews. Who is this this supposed to make sense to? it does not even vaguely pass as truth.
So his sister, who he bought the account for, and who spent those two years making fake reviews on just happened not to mention the communication? How gullible do you have to be to believe that?
She did fake reviews of the other developer's (=her) apps. Why should he be aware of that?
I can only speak for myself but there's lots of things my sisters do that they don't tell me about.. especially if it's something that would piss me off.
Having just listened to the recording of his phone call with Apple I have come to 3 conclusions:
1. Apple have bent over backwards to give this guy a chance to reinstate his developer account. The guy on the call was extremely professional and fair.
2. The developer's tone during that call was a bit offhand and far from appreciative that the SVP of Marketing of the largest company in the world actually cared enough to make this call happen!
3. Recording the call with Apple and making it public was the final nail in the coffin. He can probably expect a demand from Apple to take down that recording immediately and in my opinion has little to no chance of ever doing business with Apple again. Phil Schiller will be furious and rightly so.
THE END![]()
I doubt that would ever happen, those kind of folks rarely learn from their mistakes.. it doesn't fit their agenda.Good on Apple!
Dalrymple said it best:
"The integrity of the App Store is as important to Apple as it is to consumers. When you read a review on the store, you want to know that it’s real. In some cases, they can be the deciding factor on which app you purchase and download.
This is part of the reason we trust Apple and the App Store. They found inconsistencies in a developers account, tried to work with them to resolve the issue, and took decisive action to protect developers and customers when their attempts failed.
It seems to me Apple has given the developer every opportunity to change the behavior that started this whole mess. I don’t think we can ask any more from Apple in these types of situations. App Store fraud cannot be tolerated."
People should go back to the original post from last Thursday and revisit some of the awful comments lodged against Apple.
Why is this surprising? It's a relative with the same last name. If they only want to use their last name that's how it would show![]()
Good god. You're determined, in the face of all reasonable evidence, to try to put this on Apple. By the way all those apps that are "hers"?
"com.kapeli.*"
It might be helpful to know what you're talking about. Reverse domain notation (aka organization identifier) is unique on the app store
This isn't that weird. She probably doesn't have a website and he probably the told her to use that once years before and she kept pasting that over and over.
And it's pretty irrelevant if you think about it. If Apple is ready to admit him back they think there was no fraud from his part.
You misunderstand. The Bundle ID has to be unique, and it is. "com.kapeli.dashdoc" is different than "com.kapeli.dockview". It wouldn't be possible for Dash to be on one account and all the other apps under the other Kapeli to be on another if what you are saying was true.
All he had to do was admit his wrongdoing and instead he pulled this stunt recording the call. He's never getting back on the App Store.
[doublepost=1476158177][/doublepost]
I don't. ORGANISATION IDENTIFIER. The clue is in the name. All the apps are his and on his account.
All he had to do was admit his wrongdoing and instead he pulled this stunt recording the call. He's never getting back on the App Store.
[doublepost=1476158177][/doublepost]
I don't. ORGANISATION IDENTIFIER. The clue is in the name. All the apps are his and on his account.
The Apple rep. on the phone with the developer talked about "two accounts" being linked. Since there are two of them, there is a distinction. If there is a distinction, they should be treated (and contacted) separately.