Don't look at those eyes. And ignore the poop Apple will be excreting about this.
Shortly after the U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion demanding Apple comply with an order to help it unlock the iPhone 5c of San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook, Apple executives shared key information with several reporters, including BuzzFeed's John Paczkowski, about government missteps that may have led to reduced access to the iPhone in question.
According to Apple, the Apple ID password on the iPhone was changed "less than 24 hours" after being in government hands. Had the password not been altered, Apple believes the backup information the government is asking for could have been accessible to Apple engineers. The FBI has said it has access to weekly iCloud backups leading up to October 19, but not after that date, and it is seeking later information that could be stored on the device.Apple executives said the entire backdoor demand could have potentially been avoided if the Apple ID password not been changed, as connecting to a known Wi-Fi network would have caused the device to start backing up automatically so long as iCloud backups were enabled. Instead, with the information inaccessible, the FBI has requested tools that set what Apple calls a "dangerous precedent." The FBI wants a version of iOS that accepts electronic passcode input and removes passcode features like time limits and data erasure following failures.
Apple says the software would be the equivalent of a master key that could be used to access millions of devices (including Apple's newest iPhones and iPads) and has called the demand an "overreach" with chilling implications. Apple executives today also refuted the DOJ's claim that the company's refusal to comply is a marketing tactic, saying it was done based on "love for the country" and "desire not to see civil liberties tossed aside."
Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.
Article Link: Apple Says Government Changed Apple ID Password on Shooter's iPhone, Losing Access to Data
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Says Apple ID Password on Shooter's iPhone Changed in Government Possession, Losing Access to Data
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
...and you require everyone you email to/from use it as well? How do you keep the addresses private? Email is inherently insecure, and while the steps you're taking make it a little less insecure, it's not by much.
A larger issue is simply one of personal security and safety. Imagine the bad guys having the ability to extract all the personal information from the phones of first responders, police officers, doctors and nurses, soldiers. Imagine the psychological terror to say nothing of the real possibility that once someone has your personal information, just the information in your contact list, they can use that against you and your family. Even going so far as to threaten the health and safety of your spouse and children, relatives and friends. Imagine the position that could put our service men and woman. Imagine what it would do to you if someone had a back door to your phone and used that to blackmail you? To destroy your reputation. To post on your behalf and upload pictures unless ransom is paid. To enter into databases and change your personal information. To use that information to hack into your children's phones and do the same to them.
To say that "I have nothing to hide" is ignorant in the extreme. You do have something to PROTECT and it goes well beyond the person that owns the phone and records data in it.
Uh, the last time I checked, it is the current DEMOCRAT in the White House who is demanding that Apple build a back door into the iPhone. What makes you think Hillary or even Bernie would be any different in practice?
Anyway, Democrats are the party of billionaires. Look at George Soros, Warren Buffett, Michael Bloomberg and most of the Silicon Valley crowd.
I agree, especially for Hillary Clinton.
BUT I am convinced Bernie Sanders would care about human rights of the US citizens (and hopefully human rights of all citizens in other countries as well, which was NEVER the case) - Bernie Sanders did this already since decades. Hillary did not and is a pudel of Big Money.
https://theintercept.com/2016/02/19/hillary-clinton-goldman-sachs-transcripts/
Not only that but one thing everyone seems to be missing is once the device it turned off it it has to be logged back in before it connects to wifi. So Apples "fix" to get current backup by connecting to known wifi most likely wouldn't have worked unless the device was never turned off.So, we know Apple cooperated with the FBI in the days following the attack. It was reportedly just iCloud backups that was handed over but now that the password was changed, the plan they had wasn't going to work. The plan was to have the phone connect to a known wifi network and connected to a charger so it could create a backup automatically, as it should. The the FBI could request the backup data without unlocking the phone. BUT, like I said, the password was changed. So now you HAVE TO unlock the phone and input the new password for the Apple ID before you can create a backup again. But that's the problem, we don't know the passcode.
Which means resources will be devoted to that, and we won't see a Mac Pro until 2023... Really bad precedence. Currently no software is known to exist to do this. It's the government forcing a private company to build/create something. Apple has done what they can-have helped the FBI, providing them with his iCloud backups. Any records of phone calls/texts can be retrieved from the carrier. What are they hoping to find? The fact he destroyed his personal phone and not this one (this is reported as a work phone) says to me he wasn't stupid enough to leave anything on it anyway or risk being caught from his employer a local government outfit.
Please remove your passcode, and fingerprint ID. Please make it easier for any hacker to get your personal, financial, medical information. Remember you have nothing to hide. Please post you sSN, drivers lic no. Bank account no. below......do your part to prevent the need for hacking.
Of course not. My secure emails are between friends, co-workers. We all have email certs and select encryption when email each other. Addresses are never encrypted but the body is encrypted from inception and sitting on any servers. That's how we roll
The very sad part is, our President is on the government side of this issue, demanding the backdoor.
I did not vote him into the office for this kind of crap...
Your post gave me an idea. Any time an anti-encryption Bill is introduced in Congress, language should be included that requires that the personal data (including PII) of those that vote for it (and their family members) must be published on a government website for all to see. Because, they have nothing to hide of course and don't seem to think that protecting this data is in any way important.
Gotta take care of lobbyists. That's a huge problem within American Politics. Someone has an active interest in more FBI presence and less blockades known as "rights and principles."
brilliant and if government won't do it, may some hacker would as a public service.
You know.. I like Tim Cook. I think he's doing a fine job (even though he needs to hurry up with the new Macs already). But.. he does look like that cat haha.
We always hear Android market share is higher than Apple's - yet they are completely absent from this discussion. The only conclusion can be: ANDROID already HAS A BACKDOOR !
I get this part. I just think in this one case - what does it matter? Either Apple can assist them via the cloud or (if possible) through THAT device. I'm not talking about long term plans to make ALL phones with a backdoor. I just see little differenced in this specific case.
Someone has probably suggested this at this point, but would it be possible for Apple to just unlock the phone themselves without releasing the tools they use to do so?
The iCloud backups belong to the owner of the phone - the company that bought it - not the individual. Apple did not violate anyone's privacy by turning those over to the FBI.
Providing a back door for the FBI to hack iPhones with impunity however, is not something they are likely to do.
Those of you who think this is a single phone issue are not paying attention. The Patriot Act would immediately be used to allow anti terrorist agencies into any phone they got their hands on.
Android phones are all exposed today because this back door already existed and it's now illegal to close it...
Providing a back door for the FBI to hack iPhones with impunity however, is not something they are likely to do.
Those of you who think this is a single phone issue are not paying attention. The Patriot Act would immediately be used to allow anti terrorist agencies into any phone they got their hands on.
Android phones are all exposed today because this back door already existed and it's now illegal to close it...
Apple cannot unlock your phone. Yes I know, no one believes this, but it's true.
The point is the FBI screwed up and we may have to pay the price.