I’m sorry, but Apple haven’t claimed any extra performance due to an extra core. They made a mistake in advertising that specifically didn’t rely on the advertised 'feature' of having 10 cores instead of 9. If they had have added performance data that was incorrect, you would have a point. Conspiracies do not interest me.How do you know it is true though?
Reduction from a number 10 to a number 9 in the GPU core count does not change the GPU performance they claimed in their advertisements or landing page.Not sure how a reduction in GPU core count will not be affecting the performance. Anyway Apple will defend the change and will be hoping to avoid any lawsuit.
Under normal circumstances, mistakes are MORE likely to happen in large companies… It’s just pretty unusual for Apple specifically.At first I wanted to ask, "With a company as large as Apple, how does this even happen?"
Then I remembered how our giant government works and it all made sense.
You had funniest post of the day in the bag. Adding “AI” at the end made it Post of the Year. 👏👏Well, more GPU cores is very important when you need hyperflops in case you engage in quantum quark-zipping. A deca core setup prevents jitterbugging on the bumblewatt level. AI.
Not sure how a reduction in GPU core count will not be affecting the performance. Anyway Apple will defend the change and will be hoping to avoid any lawsuit.
In the UK, purchasers could return these on the basis that they were not as described by the retailer.They’ve also extended the return window on those who purchased during the time the mistake was online?
Doubtful, but they really should. It could have been a factor in someone’s purchasing decisions.
Yeah, they could open them up and show them there are only 9 cores. There is a difference between a typo and advertising misleading information. How could people demonstrate the device doesn’t work as advertised?In the UK, purchasers could return these on the basis that they were not as described by the retailer.
I think the handful of people who would be pedantic enough to do that, will be allowed. This case is only interesting because it is a mistake that potentially could have had serious consequences, so shouldn’t happen. But the actual case is insignificant.In the UK, purchasers could return these on the basis that they were not as described by the retailer.
It’s not a case of working as advertised; rather, the goods are not as described.Yeah, they could open them up and show them there are only 9 cores. There is a difference between a typo and advertising misleading information. How could people demonstrate the device doesn’t work as advertised?
"We are aware of a small number of users who feel that the new iPad Air was falsely advertised. We don't care."
So you’re saying that if there is any spelling error in an advertisement, then that item is able to be returned for that reason alone? Fair enough. Understood.It’s not a case of working as advertised; rather, the goods are not as described.
I think the handful of people who would be pedantic enough to do that, will be allowed. This case is only interesting because it is a mistake that potentially could have had serious consequences, so shouldn’t happen. But the actual case is insignificant.
Thank you.…I think the reason why sensible people aren't outraged is because intent matters—Apple clearly had no malice or intent to harm or take advantage of.
Amen to that!Plus I'd like to not be outraged for the next three minutes, please.
I don’t believe it was an intentional lie as some here are trying to make out. For what? For all this?It is literally one of the four specs that Apple mentions in comparisons. And they got one wrong "by mistake?" Do you even comprehend how big a mistake it is?
If TSMC delivered a million M2 chips telling Apple that they are 10 core GPU chips and then later told Apple that it was a mistake, would Apple accept it?
Actually, no one should care.
I think context is everything.I don’t believe it was an intentional lie as some here are trying to make out. For what? For all this?
That said, it was an absolute whopper of a mistake. Someone dropped the ball big time. I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes.
I dont know that they have ever held themselves as exemplars.Probably not but it's not a good look for a company that exacts itself as the exemplar of, well, everything. Apple should most definitely care and I don't think they do.