Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How do you know it is true though?
I’m sorry, but Apple haven’t claimed any extra performance due to an extra core. They made a mistake in advertising that specifically didn’t rely on the advertised 'feature' of having 10 cores instead of 9. If they had have added performance data that was incorrect, you would have a point. Conspiracies do not interest me.
 
Not sure how a reduction in GPU core count will not be affecting the performance. Anyway Apple will defend the change and will be hoping to avoid any lawsuit.
 
Not sure how a reduction in GPU core count will not be affecting the performance. Anyway Apple will defend the change and will be hoping to avoid any lawsuit.
Reduction from a number 10 to a number 9 in the GPU core count does not change the GPU performance they claimed in their advertisements or landing page.

Capeesh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: raybo and throAU
Yeah, but 9 Apple GPU cores are like 18 Non-Apple GPU cores, right?

All joking aside, this is practically a non-issue. People should buy it for the performance, not the number of cores it has on paper. Apple advertised its performance accurately, even though they didn’t accurately list the right number of cores in the specs.

But I totally get how some could be a little offended to find out that this M2 is not the same M2 that was found in the previous iPad Pro models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: raybo and PaperMag
At first I wanted to ask, "With a company as large as Apple, how does this even happen?"

Then I remembered how our giant government works and it all made sense.
Under normal circumstances, mistakes are MORE likely to happen in large companies… It’s just pretty unusual for Apple specifically.
 
Well, more GPU cores is very important when you need hyperflops in case you engage in quantum quark-zipping. A deca core setup prevents jitterbugging on the bumblewatt level. AI.
You had funniest post of the day in the bag. Adding “AI” at the end made it Post of the Year. 👏👏
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PaperMag
In the UK, purchasers could return these on the basis that they were not as described by the retailer.
Yeah, they could open them up and show them there are only 9 cores. There is a difference between a typo and advertising misleading information. How could people demonstrate the device doesn’t work as advertised?
 
In the UK, purchasers could return these on the basis that they were not as described by the retailer.
I think the handful of people who would be pedantic enough to do that, will be allowed. This case is only interesting because it is a mistake that potentially could have had serious consequences, so shouldn’t happen. But the actual case is insignificant.
 
  • Love
Reactions: PaperMag
Yeah, they could open them up and show them there are only 9 cores. There is a difference between a typo and advertising misleading information. How could people demonstrate the device doesn’t work as advertised?
It’s not a case of working as advertised; rather, the goods are not as described.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trumpler
It’s not a case of working as advertised; rather, the goods are not as described.
So you’re saying that if there is any spelling error in an advertisement, then that item is able to be returned for that reason alone? Fair enough. Understood.
 
I think the handful of people who would be pedantic enough to do that, will be allowed. This case is only interesting because it is a mistake that potentially could have had serious consequences, so shouldn’t happen. But the actual case is insignificant.

This is a good point.
 
It is literally one of the four specs that Apple mentions in comparisons. And they got one wrong "by mistake?" Do you even comprehend how big a mistake it is?

If TSMC delivered a million M2 chips telling Apple that they are 10 core GPU chips and then later told Apple that it was a mistake, would Apple accept it?
I don’t believe it was an intentional lie as some here are trying to make out. For what? For all this?

That said, it was an absolute whopper of a mistake. Someone dropped the ball big time. I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes.
 
I don’t believe it was an intentional lie as some here are trying to make out. For what? For all this?

That said, it was an absolute whopper of a mistake. Someone dropped the ball big time. I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes.
I think context is everything.

Antenna Gate, Battery Gate, Butterfly Keyboard, Scott Forstall. They were whoppers of a mistake. I don’t know that this is as high as any of those. It’s all a part of history of a company run by people who are human, and occasionally make mistakes.
 
Probably not but it's not a good look for a company that exacts itself as the exemplar of, well, everything. Apple should most definitely care and I don't think they do.
I dont know that they have ever held themselves as exemplars.

from the man himself.
“Some mistakes will be made along the way,” Jobs said in agreement. “That’s good, because at least some decisions are being made along the way.”
To be clear, Jobs, who by all accounts was known to be a perfectionist, wasn’t excusing mistakes. “We’ll find the mistakes,” he continued. “We’ll fix them.”
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.