Ya that better be a complete product wide fix.Are they going to release a security update for devices that can't run iOS 11?
Ya that better be a complete product wide fix.Are they going to release a security update for devices that can't run iOS 11?
eah, well Wi-Fi has been around for over ten years now and this flaw has just now been discovered. There is literally NO WAY to “get this stuff right to begin with
So you have an expectation that a company should pour money and resources into a product forever? At what point do you think it's fair to stop supporting an older device? These devices are already over 4 years old. A what time can they stop dumping money into a product they get nothing in return from?
I think I’m confused, is this about the clients (our devices...) or is this about the WiFi security itself? As in, does my AirPort Extreme need an update?
Any word on when the current betas will be finalized for release to everyone?
Both El Capitan and Sierra will get patched, assuming that Apple follows its usual practice.
I hope.
Apple isn't that unlucky.. ... More likely El cap won't than Sierra.
Because the attack vector would allow the attacker to send data as the client.Why do lightbulbs, toasters, and fridges need to be updated? Do you purchase things with your CC through them? maybe it would be a concern if it's handshaking with a password and account you use for everything. Or maybe I just don't understand the impact of these vunerabilities.
are you sure that El Cap does not get an update?
iOS 11 doesn't help my iPad 2, iPod 3rd Gen, or my iPhone 4S. Apple as a ethical responsibility to provide patches to all of these devices.
Not sure,, but usually Apple prefers to support one OS lower not two.. at least... based on history... It *would* give Apple an reason to say "upgrade"
When u can't even download El capitan anymore from the App Store... its on its way out.
I know. As I said, it was just an interesting sidenote on 32-bit technology. There's no need to defend your position; I wasn't disagreeing with you.Desktop vs mobile are two totally different animals. Linux keeps 32-bit support around because many server setups are built on them. A server setup is designed for different reasons than a personal smartphone.
This sentence doesn't make sense, specifically the bolded part.Mobile devices have a far shorter lifespan than desktop, especially in the server environment.
Seems time to abandon Apple!
Only if you have downloaded it before, and it is hidden, I spent three hours looking for it and Sierra on machines last week Thursday, if you did not download it before you cannot now.If this to be true: sad.
Are you sure? A few days ago I saw El Capitan in "purchases"
Only if you have downloaded it before, and it is hidden, I spent three hours looking for it and Sierra on machines last week Thursday, if you did not download it before you cannot now.
So you have an expectation that a company should pour money and resources into a product forever? At what point do you think it's fair to stop supporting an older device? These devices are already over 4 years old. A what time can they stop dumping money into a product they get nothing in return from?
Ok, I’m one of those “grammas” being talked about on here. I’m a very good user of my iPad/Mac but don’t understand a lot of what you are saying here. I do understand that my iPhone/ipad/Mac will get updated but my Sony Smart tv/Pioneer Receiver/printer will not. And so what I don’t understand is...without updates to those devices not updated, will that make banking information that I enter on my (updated) MBP, subject to be hacked?