Oh my! My tongue is dragging the road base. I'm dreaming, I know, seeing a modular iMac with both 34 inch and a 38 inch 8K monitor as options. I see a new, genuine, soft touch keyboard instead of the RSI beast they now call 'magic' - Should have called it Voldemort. Nasty nasty beast.
Dream on!
I don't see anything.
Like a MacPro for amateurs, I can't envision what they'd actually want with an iMac for Pros.
Drawing on a huge, immobile iOS device with some pencil that you can't stow away (= both the pencil and the screen) ? Or some huge iMac screen driven by a headless modular Mac (not the current subspec Mac Pro, because that's for amateurs) ?
Two observations:
1. I think SOMETHING has to be worrying the execs at Apple to make them issue these comments. I don't really remember Apple doing this kind of thing much.
2. These comments are very squishy. No real meat here other than a attempt to reassure customers that they are going to update some Macs.
This citation says soo much about their mindset:
"That is a pretty incredible evolution that we've seen over the last decade. The original iMac, you never would've thought as remotely touching pro uses."
No, we wouldn't, because that's not evolution, but
lack of evolution: due to severe neglect somewhere higher up, a midrange model is now outpacing everything else.
So now, if they'd bring out some superspec iMac ("sometime this year", or next, let's not commit ourselves), then what would be the aim of a new Mac Pro (somewhere on the "horizon") ?
I mean, is it me, or are the Apple Board members so much confused themselves, that they can't address the people and the markets anymore ?
It's so pathetic. If they lamentate enough, the 1997 Performa will become the new Mac Pro substitute.