Warren is right. Large companies must be broken down to smaller separate entities.
That is the worst idea I have ever heard. You are suggesting that Apple should abandon what made them successful in the first place and do things like that hot mess, Android. iOS would no longer be a safe and predictable environment and it would lose all the advantages it currently has over other platforms. I'm not interested in sharing mindspace or screenspace with "Sooper Anti-Virus For U" and the rest of the motley crew.The only solution is to open up the iOS platform so developers can sell directly to end users, or through other 3rd party app stores.
Yes, they are being fair. You got spend money to make money. Why would Apple let others profit from something that took them years and Millions of dollars to make?Apple charges 99$ a year to host an app on its platform. What is this charge for? To cover hosting fees?
Then Apple charges 30% of every sale Spotify makes. What is this for? I can't imagine hosting charges to be that high. And Apple makes no contribution to the development of Spotify and its products.
Sure it is Apple's platform and they can do whatever they want with it. But are they being fair?
Fair has no place in business. The market will choose what something is worth. How much do you think HMV or Virgin takes from music sales in their stores? Or Walmart from products on its shelves? Or Best Buy from boxed software?Sure it is Apple's platform and they can do whatever they want with it. But are they being fair?
It seems ludicrous to suggest that Apple should not be allowed to create their own apps just because a similar option already exists in the market.
Spotify can have 70% of iOS sales or 100% of nothing
As consumers, we bought and own the devices. Therefore, we should be able to use them however we want. If that means installing from a 3rd party app store or directly from a developer's website, then so be it. Let us check a box saying we understand that doing so may result in a degraded experience and/or require wiping the device to get technical support, but don't flat out prevent us from doing so.
Netflix also exited Apple’s in-app market due to the ridiculous 30% theft, this is not about just some rogue player. Think about it, the innovative streaming icon Netflix is saying no to Apple’s greed too.
Even better: If you're a large company like Uber, you can willfully violate Apple's privacy rules - and even willfully build in methods to avoid detection.
Smaller developers have been barred from the app store for making honest mistakes. But the Uber CEO will was invited to a "sit down" with Tim Cook. Such behavior is the exact definition of a "Tech Mafia". "Timmy the Cook"
This statement is a huge bald faced lie: "And developers, from first-time engineers to larger companies, can rest assured that everyone is playing by the same set of rules."
I've worked at both very small and very large companies that develop iOS apps, and also as a small independent. Apple treats smaller developers unfairly, and I have witnessed this.
At the large company we were able to get an app update approved in 30 minutes by making one phone call to a person at Apple WHO ANSWERED THE PHONE. The App also was using a non-public API so it was in direct violation of the App Store guidelines.
Apple is ignorant to believe developers don't see this. People move around and share stories.
I am NOT defending Spotify, but the iOS App Store is in-deed Catastrophically Broken !
AAPL Controls the Narrative, & does so to the tune of 100% !
AAPL makes their App Recommendations based-upon "Politics," NOT which apps are best for their Users.
The list goes on & on ...
"App Discovery" of good apps is NON-existent !
How much search filtering does AAPL offer ??? that one is easy to answer, except for keywords, Zero !
AAPL hit $1T USD in market cap last year ... yet, exactly how many (major) App Success Stories have occurred for apps that started life since Cook took over ... I know of NONE !
So what’s the problem?Or people will just sign up using the Spotify website and Apple gets 30% of nothing instead. Which is also what Amazon and Netflix are doing.
Totally agree with this. They might have an argument that 30% is too high but they have to pay something. They can’t expect to have their app on the AppStore for free.Well said and I agree. Apple isn’t perfect by any means, and maybe 30% is too high (although consistent with the market), but Spotify needs to pay to play in one of the largest and most lucrative marketplaces out there. Their solution is to side step the rules and make it more difficult for their customers. So be it.
it doesnt require apple any space to store and deliver the Spotify app at all. it is stored somewhere in the heaven and when you click "download" a lightning bolt comes from the sky, hits your phone and voila! you have the app installed! Every year, all the millions of lightning bolts you see are because people downloading the app.Apple charges 99$ a year to host an app on its platform. What is this charge for? To cover hosting fees?
Then Apple charges 30% of every sale Spotify makes. What is this for? I can't imagine hosting charges to be that high. And Apple makes no contribution to the development of Spotify and its products.
Sure it is Apple's platform and they can do whatever they want with it. But are they being fair?
If that’s the case then they will have to do this to playstation Xbox and Nintendo who also make 30% of any digital purchase or subscription made on their storesNetflix also exited Apple’s in-app market due to the ridiculous 30% theft, this is not about just some rogue player. Think about it, the innovative streaming icon Netflix is saying no to Apple’s greed too.
Apple is in the wrong here. Regulators will eventually step in if this nonsense escalates as subscription models continue becoming mainstream.
30% is the industry standard. This the same percentage digital goods and subscriptions get charged even on gaming consoles stores.Thank you, I agree wholeheartedly! Apple has some nerve after charging 30% which is pretty much extortion
I’m not saying they charge nothing but 30% is a big chunk, especially for indi devs and small businesses!
So what’s the problem?
30% is the industry standard. This the same percentage digital goods and subscriptions get charged even on gaming consoles stores.
If that’s the case thenI don't know how I feel about this.
It seems like most tech-minded people want net neutrality on the basis that access to the Internet has become like a utility where there are fairly few players providing access.
Well if all the world's smartphones use either Android and its store or iOS and its store, then don't they become like utilities? When there are millions of apps, it's more like a compendium of web-pages than it is a curated offering.
What if Comcast were to say that they deserve a cut of Apple's online sales because they keep the infrastructure going that brings Apple into millions of homes?
you cant sign up for amazon prime video or Netflix through their apps. Most people go to the website when an app only offers a login but not a sign up option.Not everybody knows you can sign up using the website, and developers are forbidden from even hinting that it's an option.
This is exactly why major publishers are doing their own thing on PC now.
Apple is right.
Because when an idea becomes successful on the marketplace they copy it and use their position to undercut the current app. They aren’t independent if they run the marketplace and do a hefty dose of sherlocking on the side.Its Apple's marketplace.... how is it anti competitive if they control their own marketplace.