Let the testers go at it first.Fingers crossed.![]()
Let the testers go at it first.Fingers crossed.![]()
I was a long distance runner for over 40 years. In my late 70s now. Still very fit, but gave up the running for walking and a daily power vinyasa yoga class. As a result of all those years of running I have an enlarged left ventricle (LVH), buildup of plaque in the arteries, and a resting heart rate of 41. While I have never had any symptoms, I monitor my vitals regularly. I have a KardiaMobile EKG monitor, which works pretty well, except it won't record an EKG if the heart rate is less than 50. I do a few jumping jacks before taking a reading. It appears the Apple Watch will have the same limitation. AliveCor, the maker of the KardiaMobile, says it plans to release an updated version of its technology in April, which will be a six-lead ECG reader, as opposed to Apple's current release, which is a one-lead ECG.If someone falls into a low risk category, then I'm pretty sure on 99% of that demographic will not check that frequently. But if you have a known issue, or fall into a higher risk category then more people will use it.
I've recently turned 50, have no known heart issues, keep myself very fit but still fully plan to use this feature regularly once it's available.
Why? Because I know two of the members of the Triathlon club I'm member of who have died of heart attach in their mid-50's. Both super fit men who did IronMan events, but didn't realise they had underlying health issues.
Because you people drive on the other side of the road Apple need more time to reverse all the waveforms ;-).so, do i have to permanently (until it comes to UK/EU) move my AppleID to US to make ECG work properly?
And 99% of users will try it once, find out their heart is normal and never touch it again, despite vehemently demanding it every day for the past 2 months.
ECG support more likely than not comes will come with foot-long, lawyerese, "agree-to-proceed" disclaimers.
Wonder about false negatives which would be a class-action suit waiting to happen. False-positives not so much -- just nuisance.
To be fair, it was kind of a selling point for the new watch. You cant promote sales with a feature that doesn't exist.And 99% of users will try it once, find out their heart is normal and never touch it again, despite vehemently demanding it every day for the past 2 months.
Until Apple can be held responsible for a death they shouldn't be in the health business; either get in or outI'm excited for this. It's nice Apple isn't totally leaving people with older Watches in the dust with heart updates.
I have an irregular heart rhythm condition. Its going to be interesting to see if the watch picks it up.
Apple would have to have demonstrated safety and efficacy of the device for its intended use to gain clearance. Sure, it could have bugs but FDA clearance ups the bar in terms of what you can expect. This is the same device classification as a CT machine in a hospital for example. You expect accuracy and reliability from that when you go to the hospital.I’m infinitely curious how well or not well this works, since Apple software quality control (in general not just the watch) has taken a serious nosedive in the past several years
5.1 bricked watches! 5.1.1 fixed it supposedly, and now 5.1.2 will be in control of your ECG monitoring. That’s quite the progression
Apple would have to have demonstrated safety and efficacy of the device for its intended use to gain clearance. Sure, it could have bugs but FDA clearance ups the bar in terms of what you can expect. This is the same device classification as a CT machine in a hospital for example. You expect accuracy and reliability from that when you go to the hospital.
Looks like it was actually the SW that was classified. The notification and the ECG app were both separately cleared/registered. If you really want to nerd out, here's some reading.One would hope. Food & Drug Administration is a bit buggy itself tho
and they agreed to certify it on basis of hardware, at the time of its announcement if I'm not mistaken, not the software side -- no?
In theory, it should be a case of modifying 'Region' with the Language & Region section of the general settings within the Apple Watch app. Not long to find outso, do i have to permanently (until it comes to UK/EU) move my AppleID to US to make ECG work properly?
True... Statistically, the percentage of people who don't have any heart rhythm issues is more like 95%. However, for that remaining 5%, including my wife who has SVT, it is literally a potential life saver!
So is the Doctor or Nurse going to take you seriosly when you've given out instructions how to get arould Apple's health app?In theory, it should be a case of modifying 'Region' with the Language & Region section of the general settings within the Apple Watch app. Not long to find out
One would hope. Food & Drug Administration is a bit buggy itself tho
and they agreed to certify it on basis of hardware, at the time of its announcement if I'm not mistaken, not the software side -- no?
They are actually giving every watch back to the S1 the ability to measure irregular heart beat in the background as well. Not as good as an ECG but definitely a useful feature.There'll likely be security updates; they updated tvOS after all, and that never has new features. So every supported Watch should get it.