Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You know what Apple should do? Go back to strict private betas for some of its releases. Just have established app store developers be the beta testers and internal company testers. This will reduce the high concentration of saturated junk articles just telling us there is a beta 123456789 etc. This is not targeted at Macrumors, it goes for even Windows 11 too. The tech sites, Youtubers have oversaturated the content they deliver with every little thing Apple does these days. Coverage needs to be a little more value added and meaningful. Also, the element of surprise is missing.

A strategy I would recommend the company could use is, every other year, have a public beta, and just let it be the last two betas before GM that users get access to. Also, make only be for the stability and clean up releases (aka Snow Leopard, High Sierra).
If your not interested in content clearly indicated in title, it’s pretty easy to skip the article. I am interested in features that are coming and changes that are evolving. So I willingly and appreciatively choose to read the ariticles.
 
Sounds like you are new to all this, because they did only private betas for many years before they started public betas with Sierra. With a few exceptions such as 10.0 and 10.5, releases such as Jaguar, Panther, Tiger, Tiger for Intel, Lion, Mountain Lion, Mavericks were all private. Yet, Big Sur which was public has more glaring bugs that I am sure public testers didn't pick up. Its really no benefit to be honest.
While I agree that overall software quality and QA on Apple's part has gone downhill, with some egregious regression bugs lost in a seemingly eternal limbo of not being addressed for years on end on account of not being “critical” enough for Apple engineers to care, you seem to be failing to appreciate just how much bigger and more complex Apple's market is these days.

Also, FYI, don't let my badge and post count fool you; in my case, look at join date instead. My first Mac was an iMac G4 USB 2.0 which came preinstalled with Jaguar and bundled with Panther upgrade discs. Those were, indeed, “the days”, but we paid through the nose for upgrades (I bought a boxed copy of Tiger for €120, IIRC, and paid for all ESD upgrades on the MAS right until the last one, having only skipped SL because my 2009 iMac came bundled with it). And the same should go for everyone else here, even if it's the other way around or anything in between; maybe our fellow forum-goer simply joined us later on or even bought a Mac much, much later, but that doesn't mean they didn't reach the same conclusion just by staying informed – maybe even as far back as way before buying their first Mac, yes – and looking objectively at the current state of affairs.

The switch to Intel brought about an explosion of choice and different possibilities (remember Steve Jobs' old, cutesy 2x2 product matrix for the then recently revamped Mac line? Yeah, neither do I), as well as third-party software and peripherals galore. How many really critical bugs were related to the latter, with external hard drives getting mysteriously erased, audio interfaces suddenly not working at all, etc., remember those? Yeah, that's why public betas are essential, as developers alone can't cover the entire gamut of configuration combinations.
 
Last edited:
Who says it’s not available at launch? That it is not included in this and the previous betas doesn’t mean it won’t make it to final… It’s not the first time it takes some betas before a feature is available. They may add it to the next beta.

They’re getting close to feature lock and now just squashing bugs. If it’s not in the next beta or two, it won’t be a launch feature. Probably.
 
What is a corner in rounded building? 😄

See, corners have disappeared...

Screen Shot 2021-08-11 at 6.10.04 PM.png
 
So is Universal Control coming out the same time as AirPower?

AirPower was a nice vaporware. Announce something and abandon it. That wasn’t how Apple operated. They would have things ready and then announce them. I cringe at how people love this.. announce in September, available in November.. etc.

But UC is likely more important to them considering it enables better use of iPad.
 
Also, FYI, don't let my badge and post count fool you; in my case, look at join date instead. My first Mac was an iMac G4 USB 2.0 which came preinstalled with Jaguar and bundled with Panther upgrade discs. Those were, indeed, “the days”, but we paid through the nose for upgrades.

My first Mac was a IIcx in 1989. At least by the time OS X came around, you know Apple was going to survive. In the early 90s that was far from certain.
 
I have a MBP (see attached) and am running Big Sur. As it is an older model, I am wondering if I should stop where I am - if anyone with a MBP similar to mine is running the Beta of Monterey, I would appreciate your feedback.
I'd probably say yes. By the looks of it Monterey feels like a faster version of Big Sur...
 
Updated fine on MacBook Air 2017 model. Now trying out compact tab view in Safari once again. It was buggy and unusable in beta 4.
 
2 Questions for Monterey beta experts:

1) Do I need to install beta 4 before beta 5 will show up? (I installed beta 4 and it broke Final Cut Pro (v 10.5.4), so I reinstalled the first public beta, and now it tells me beta 4 is available as an upgrade (again), but it doesn't give me beta 5...)

2) Anyone using Final Cut Pro successfully with beta 5? The problems with beta 4 were impossible to overcome; it mostly crashed on startup, but if not, then it crashed soon after, even when I wasn't doing a thing in the app... I don't want to install 5 if FCP isn't working in it either!

Follow up note: Thanks for your responses. I did eventually see beta 5 (in the place of 4) available for install; I've installed it and I'm having no problems with Final Cut Pro X (on an i9 Intel Mac). So, all's well so far...
 
Last edited:
A strategy I would recommend the company could use is, every other year, have a public beta, and just let it be the last two betas before GM that users get access to. Also, make only be for the stability and clean up releases (aka Snow Leopard, High Sierra).

IMHO the problem isn't how many beta they push but instead how they work in communicating with the testers. They have to be WAY more transparent in how they handle and follow the reports, in what under the hood' changes they implent from the start of the new OS, in what to test. This will give betas more purpouse.

I can't believe that one of the major new features that they advertise (and most discussed) is the 'new' safari... really a brand new OS release and they update a standalone app? Updates in Maps from beta to beta? We need to talk about M1 support, ethernet, wifi, metal, firmware, ... all the "boring" stuff that they don't let us know what they are working on.
 
Last edited:
Quick question: Is Mail Privacy Protection already implemented?

In my case and when enabled, none of my received e-mails is able to privately load remote content. 2 days ago, I received an e-mail from Apple (survey about my MBP) and remote content could not be loaded. Apple's own mail!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
2 Questions for Monterey beta experts:

1) Do I need to install beta 4 before beta 5 will show up? (I installed beta 4 and it broke Final Cut Pro (v 10.5.4), so I reinstalled the first public beta, and now it tells me beta 4 is available as an upgrade (again), but it doesn't give me beta 5...)

2) Anyone using Final Cut Pro successfully with beta 5? The problems with beta 4 were impossible to overcome; it mostly crashed on startup, but if not, then it crashed soon after, even when I wasn't doing a thing in the app... I don't want to install 5 if FCP isn't working in it either!
Strange. I have been using FCPX 10.5.4 without any problems on my M1 macmini on beta 1-4. And still seems to work well on beta 5.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.