Ok ty!Yes, it was initially listed under the “Release” section as 14.1 and has been moved to the “Beta” section as a GM seed. The build number alone shows it’s still a beta build.
Ok ty!Yes, it was initially listed under the “Release” section as 14.1 and has been moved to the “Beta” section as a GM seed. The build number alone shows it’s still a beta build.
Looks like those of us that got it installed really quick can expect another update when it’s officially released. 14.1GM has a build # of 18A8395, while 14.0.1 is 18A393. Meaning this GM build would likely be 18A395 when officially released.Whelp, I'm waiting for my iPhone 11 Pro Max to boot up after updating to iOS 14.1 from within Finder from the downloaded .ipsw File. I guess I'll know, maybe, soon enough why it was pulled. Looks like maybe I'll be updating twice today 😂
Apple has a real opportunity to skip Face ID by verifying if the wearer’s Apple Watch is nearby. The Watch is already a secure authenticated device.
As others have stated, not true. People with Apple Watches can't unlock other MacBooks so why would they be able to unlock other iPhones? Or why can't I see other peoples Watches battery on my iPhone? Your Watch and your iPhone are already tied together and not with any others.Except if someone is nearby wanting to snoop on your phone, they can.
So they should make it so you can lock your iPhone with the watch as well, or you know, if you don't want anyone snooping on your phone, lock it before you set it down? Out of habit I always lock my phone when I set it down.No, they don’t have this opportunity. The Apple Watch already uses an unlocked iPhone as a way to bypass the passcode unlock on the watch. You can’t then circle back and allow an unlocked Apple Watch to unlock an iPhone.
If your unlocked phone unlocks your Apple Watch and then you walk a short distance from your phone you don’t want your phone to be unlocked if someone else picks it up. Once it’s unlocked they can keep it unlocked by preventing the screen from sleeping which would severely undermine the security built in.
I don’t want my Apple Watch passcode to, essentially, be the passcode that can be used to unlock my iPhone.
I've been saying the same. And they need to stay in range, and the watch needs to stay worn. So if someone steals the phone, it locks once OOR of the Watch, and if they steal both somehow, the iPhone locks because it's no longer detected as worn. Unless some sicko chops off your hand and wristI’d love to have seen a point update with a solution to face masks.
Apple has a real opportunity to skip Face ID by verifying if the wearer’s Apple Watch is nearby. The Watch is already a secure authenticated device. When you put on the Watch at home, Face ID on your iPhone verifies you and passes on that security to your Watch. As long as you keep the Watch on, it should be able to unlock your iPhone even if you’re wearing a mask.
Apple Watch has the U1 chip. It knows *exactly* where your iPhone is, down to millimetre precision and direction.
Looks like those of us that got it installed really quick can expect another update when it’s officially released. 14.1GM has a build # of 18A8395, while 14.0.1 is 18A393. Meaning this GM build would likely be 18A395 when officially released.
what bugs are you running into?I have already found some nasty bugs so I hope Apple will release another one.![]()
what bugs are you running into?
That would be different than a public release.They're back on the dev website, as GM builds, under Beta releases
Nothing was actually launched.Launched by mistake? Someone at Apple lost their job today.
Not always. There were times when the GMs were identical with the final ones.That would be different than a public release.
And yet, Apple seems to think it's good enough for your Mac. Why not the iPhone, then? Also, they wouldn't FORCE anyone to use this authentication method, just as they don't force you to use it with your Mac. It's an option, and if anyone felt it wasn't secure enough, they could simply choose to NOT use it.Sometimes my mack even does not unlock when I'm sitting in front of it. So it is not as accurate as it seems.
[automerge]1602622319[/automerge]
No it doesn’t know where your phone is “down to millimetre precision and direction”. It knows the distance between the two devices.
And even if it did, that doesn’t meant that you are the one trying to access the phone.
Again; it doesn’t know who’s using the phone even if it knows down to 100 millionth of a millimetre precision where the phone is.
Just include touchID as well as faceID and the user can use whichever they prefer or that’s applicable.
Hmmm I’m not having any of those issues.- Safari is a mess. It freezes, can’t touch anything, your only option is to force close the app an try again.
- Regardless of the app, the keyboard does not show up az 10/8 times.
- I think related to the keyboard issue, but some of the apps freeze when the keyboard should be open. Tweetbot, Safari are just my 2 examples I ran into in the last 10 minutes.
Then there should be an opt-out option. It’s possible to unlock the MacBook with the watch, and nobody fretted it. Or they could simply require a single tap on the watch to open the iPhone when FaceID is activated. If someone else has your phone, you wouldn’t have to allow it to be unlocked. A single tap on the watch would still be better than 6 taps on the iPhone screen.The fact that your phone is "nearby" doesn't necessarily mean that you are the one using the phone.
I’d love to have seen a point update with a solution to face masks.
Apple has a real opportunity to skip Face ID by verifying if the wearer’s Apple Watch is nearby. The Watch is already a secure authenticated device. When you put on the Watch at home, Face ID on your iPhone verifies you and passes on that security to your Watch. As long as you keep the Watch on, it should be able to unlock your iPhone even if you’re wearing a mask.