I've been following these threads and don't remember seeing a confirmation either way. Could someone testing the service try it out and confirm either way?
OK I can definitely state that it is using wave analysis. Here is what I did to be absolutely certain there was no metadata, even embedded in the file in some way that I was not able to see:
1.) I grabbed a track that many years ago I had recorded via Internet music stream. At that time I was saving songs as WAVs, to avoid another lossy itineration (and the app I used had trouble compressing on-the-fly too). This track was Blondie's Rapture, apparently a live version, but no idea from what album.
2.) Renamed WAV to "The Beatles - Yesterday.wav" and converted to 128kbs MP3.
3.) Dragged and dropped the MP3 into iTunes where it was matched right away.
4.) Went to another machine and fired up iTunes. Sure enough I found it, under the name I had given it--not its actual name.
5.) Downloaded it to that other machine and it downloaded as "The Beatles - Yesterday.m4a." It is the Blondie song though, naturally.
So it DOES indeed use wave analysis but it did NOT correct a single thing. I was under the impression it would add the appropriate metadata but it did not. Not happy about that actually.
Michael
----------
So far I am 1 for 2. Bartender Song was the explicit version. But Avril Lavigne's Girlfriend was not. Yet the title on ATV still showing as explicit.Yes. Gwen Stefani The Sweet Escape matched to the clean version when the original track was explicit. There are probably others but that's the one I caught yesterday.
They need to fix the danged metadata or at least TITLES if they are going to change them.
Michael