It could be that as Mountain Lion is to Lion what Snow Leopard was to Leopard, that the OS will be bug-free (or as bug-free as is possible), fast and saves on disk space, as well as adding a few new features.
We can only wish...
It could be that as Mountain Lion is to Lion what Snow Leopard was to Leopard, that the OS will be bug-free (or as bug-free as is possible), fast and saves on disk space, as well as adding a few new features.
It could be that as Mountain Lion is to Lion what Snow Leopard was to Leopard, that the OS will be bug-free (or as bug-free as is possible), fast and saves on disk space, as well as adding a few new features.
Snow Leopard initial release was not bug free, not even close. It had a lot of bugs which had been fixed by the time of 10.6.2 and then some more by 10.6.4.
It could be that as Mountain Lion is to Lion what Snow Leopard was to Leopard, that the OS will be bug-free (or as bug-free as is possible), fast and saves on disk space, as well as adding a few new features.
My main Lion bugs, which may or may not be Lion-specific, have to do with three things:
1. Slow Finder response.
I have directories with hundreds of files and programs, and Lion often takes foreever just to be able to show me a simple directory listing. Even after showing me the directory, it then takes longer to show all the icons. I have 8GB of RAM and plenty of hard disk space.
Why the heck are they releasing 10.8 so soon after 10.7? Isn't it better to let 10.7 mature a bit, get all the bugs out, and have a nice stable user experience before they dive into the next release?
I suspect part of the reason is that going to 10.8 gives them the excuse to dump support for early 64 bit intel macs.
I have and it only started recently. Probably the last update. It's driving me crazy.My 2011 iMac still takes some time to find the wifi connection when I wake it from sleep - anyone else having this problem?
No more support for Core 2 systems (and Core 2 based Xeons)? That would be surprising to shift to only supporting Nehalem and later.
Or maybe one shouldn't be surprised by any steps that Apple takes for planned obsolescence....
I still can't understand how they have not fixed Bluetooth File Exchange in browse mode. The buttons are missing!
Sorry, but I don't want to spend even $29 bucks for Apple to fix THEIR OWN BUGS. That's what the point upgrades are for (like 10.7.4, 10.7.5 and so on.) Well, that how things USED to be at least!
BTW, I really like Lion. I never had a problem with Lion and I have it installed on three of my Macs. I ABSOLUTELY LOVE mission control! Don't you know that you still can use expose with it easily too? Oh well, I guess that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
The only thing that I don't like is Apple's new concept of having a new version of OS X every year. As I said before, to me that's very risky.
My 2009 iMac doesn't that have that issue with Lion; is this problem specific to the 2011 iMacs?
Bit of a kick in the teeth to anyone who bought one of those machines on Apple's sales pitch of it being a 64 bit machine.
My 2009 iMac doesn't that have that issue with Lion; is this problem specific to the 2011 iMacs?
Just when I was thinking of converting from PC to MAC I see this.
JEEZ!
I thought Apple had their $&*t together and "It Just Works!"
After reading this thread, now I'm scared.
Is it possible to buy a Mac with an older tried and true OS?![]()
iOS devices generate over 80% of Apple's gross profits. If I was Tim Cook, I would laugh at anyone who tried to tell me that Apple is "too concerned" with iOS. On the other hand, I would listen to anyone who tried to tell me that Apple is "not concerned enough" about [consumerizing] OSX.
EDIT:
Apple seems intent on giving us an identical user experience across all its devices. I want a consistent user experience, not an identical one.
I have a recurring nightmare that I will fire up my Mac one day and see a "home" screen with a grid of application icons.
The fact that the issue is so widespread indicates it's a problem on Apple's end not with 3rd party software or configuration on end users machines. Just because you're not experiencing the issue it doesn't mean there's no issue.
I've seen numerous references to it including from a user who I know is an advanced user who even went out and bought a new MBP and still had the issue. Definitely a problem introduced by Lion and yet to be properly addressed.are you sure the problems are as "widespread" as you think?
You have obviously never run Windows ME.
Lion was working great for the past few days that I've had my brand-new Mac Mini,until I restarted it last night, only to find that upon startup, I am no longer allowed to login to my user account... what?!?
It tells me this: "logging in to the account failed because an error occurred"
That's it. Can't access my computer anymore. Making me start to think that Lion is a serious POS...
Called Apple, only to have them give me instructions which I have already tried myself... anyone have any suggestions? Or just "F" Lion? Ha...
Apple already ended the support for Leopard, which is a much younger OS than Vista - "if that says something..."
And Microsoft only ended the "mainstream" support for Vista, which means that it will only receive security fixes from now on. Leopard will no longer receive ANYTHING from Apple. That's a big difference: Vista is on life support, Leopard is officially dead.
Also, Vista never really reached a two digit market share (but still had more users world wide than OS X). The Windows desktop market is basically divided between XP and 7, with 7 now finally having the larger market share. From a business perspective, Microsoft cannot be blamed for ending the mainstream support for Vista after the usual five years.
By the way - five years. Does that number ring a bell? Do you know ANY Apple platform that has been supported for that long? No. Because they don't. Apple's entire business model evolves around planned obsolescence.
I wish Greenpeace or anyone else would slam Apple for the planned obsolescence crap. At least you can use Apple computers securely for around 5 years _if_ you continue to buy OS upgrades, until they arbitrarily cut you off. It's hard to find a professional use for them after that.
My 2006 Mac Mini will probably get security updates until 10.8 is out, that makes it exactly 6 years of secure operation. No comparison to the longevity of early XP desktops, though, which might happily live twice as long.
It could be that as Mountain Lion is to Lion what Snow Leopard was to Leopard, that the OS will be bug-free (or as bug-free as is possible), fast and saves on disk space, as well as adding a few new features.