That's good and too bad... I was enjoying a little forced work-life balance with this first beta!Can confirm Outlook and teams now works as it did before
I heard it was suppose to be a dev update. I am so like lost right nowL
I am noticing that Apple Beta Software program site is hard to access currently (very slow to respond) - local to Cupertino. I don't see a PB for iPadOS 14.5 beta yet.
Wonder if they are bringing back public beta for WatchOS to get more people testing the face mask unlock.beta.apple.com site is now saying "We'll be back"
We're busy updating the Apple Beta Software Program website and it will be back soon.
Exactly. The closer we get to final build, the earlier the letter should be. More than likely the "J" build had something screwed up or changed that shouldn't have been, so they just pushed out an older build they already had, instead of trying to fix it very quickly to push out a new version.
You are current, I was thinking that the numbers increase build and hexadecimal came to mind as a counting system that used letters, didn't pay attention to what the letters actually where. In Xcode (assuming that's what they are using) The build system includes the compiling steps. So it's actually represents a build. And you could build the same build number several times, not that you would or should.Not hexadecimal, as neither j nor k are present in hex. Hexadecimal is ending with f
And the letter does not represent a build but a compile of one specific build. See my comment above.
Thats a good explanation, thanks, my point was just that the last number goes up as it gets better, and not down to an A.Not quite.
So 20D64 should be read as 20-D-64, or 20-4-64, and means "Big Sur, release 4, build 64." And you have to guess when the 64 part was last reset. The only thing you can be certain of is that 20 represents Big Sur, 20D 11.2 and 20D63, 20D64 and 20D65 are ordered builds of 11.2 (and they probably won't all go public, or even pass whatever internal testing Apple has).
- The first number is the product version family. Apple could do whatever they want with this, but it'll increase with each major version. Probably only by one, but that's not guaranteed. For instance, Catalina is 19 and Big Sur is 20. No idea if macOS 12 will be 21; it's the logical guess, but it's not guaranteed.
- The letter represents a minor version. In the past, 10.15.0 might have been A, 10.15.1 might have been B. With Big Sur, it seems they consume a letter for both minor or patch versions. We're up to D now for 11.2, which is the fourth release (11.0, 11.0.1, 11.1 and 11.2). So 11.2.1 or 11.3 will probably be E, whichever comes next. I don't know if Apple tries to reclaim letters if they decide not to release a version. For instance, 11.2.1 might get some traction as a minor release and then just be rolled up to 11.3. If they were both in testing, I could see 11.2.1 using up E so that 11.3 was F.
- The final number represents a build number within the version. Apple typically does builds at least daily, and they may reset this part of the build number between minor releases.
TL;DR: The first number represents the major version. The letter represents the release within the version in a way you can't reverse engineer. The last number represents the build within that version and release.
Still too long: A one digit change to the build could still be a huge number of changes, or otherwise have a huge impact.
I opted out of the public beta's for now.Does it still occur with the updated beta 1?
I still believe they haven’t ironed out the iPhone 12 wireless connectivity issues that have been present since day 1.
Feature changes is what's being examined, otherwise no qualms about using iPadOS beta IMHO.Is this public beta stable enough to use in primary device?. And do you need to also update your watchOS fo have the unlock with Apple Watch feature? Thanks
You need to install the beta on your watch to use the unlocking feature.Is this public beta stable enough to use in primary device?. And do you need to also update your watchOS fo have the unlock with Apple Watch feature? Thanks
Thanks. And no public watchOS beta yet I guess.You need to install the beta on your watch to use the unlocking feature.
I’m damn sure this feature requires 2FA, which I can’t use. I don’t use beta but this feature would help me checking stuff quickly while wearing a mask.This opt-in option lets you use an unlocked and authenticated Apple Watch as a secondary authentication method to unlock an iPhone alongside Face ID. With this feature, you no longer have to enter a passcode or remove your mask to unlock your iPhone.
Test it on someone else. It unlocks when sees any face. In addition you wifi should be on ti gave it active.Wow. I am really impressed with how fast my iPhone 12 Pro Max unlocks with my Apple Watch, awesome feature!
Also, I tested this about 15 times in a row, and it has worked every single time, and every single time since!
Really, really impressed.
![]()
Fixed authentication bug that’s caused MS office apps to crashThat was a fast update... I wonder what changed so quickly!
It does, pretty sure that this relates specifically to that bugHopefully it fixes Outlook and Teams crashing when MDM'd from a company....damm annoying
It certainly appears that they’re finally following SemVer-like semantics;Do we know why Apple no longer uses the 14.x.x update format? I’m late to the party.