Considering the current 5 series is quite a few years older than the new Mazda 3, I'd wager that the Mazda designer is a BMW fan too.I think more like a new mazda 3
Considering the current 5 series is quite a few years older than the new Mazda 3, I'd wager that the Mazda designer is a BMW fan too.I think more like a new mazda 3
What's the difference between a BMW and a snail?
...
The snail has the slime on the outside.
Who the hell needs the Lightning port on a mobile device anyway? Or USB-C for that matter?
Could this work both ways? Could the phone receive power when near one of these chargers as well as send power to a device like the Apple Watch? If the watch could charge this way, as long as you keep your phone topped off you would never have to remove and charge your watch again. The watch and phone would WattUp at the coffee shop and the watch would WattUp when away from a standard charger.
What do you do then when the phone locks up and needs to be connected to a PC in order for a full restore???
I find it rediculous that we are looking at the 2017 iPhone as the real upgrade from the 2014 iphone.
Wireless charging-at-a-distance with no adverse tradeoffs/consequences is not yet ready for prime time.
What do you do then when the phone locks up and needs to be connected to a PC in order for a full restore???
I find it rediculous that we are looking at the 2017 iPhone as the real upgrade from the 2014 iphone.
Wish I could just skip a yearDarn, so that more or less confirms that there won't be any wireless charging option this year. I guess if they can make it truly wireless then it's for sure worth another year wait. Just please bring fast charging
Next year would be too early anyway.
People don' t realize, how much research there has to be done for long term effect on health, etc.
It can' t be that there is electricity in the air without some radiation or other effects, magnetic fields, etc.
I , for one, don' t have a good feeling about it.
If it checks out, and it is good, it will be world changing though, and will shake up the entire tech industry.
In the long run, and tech improves, no more power cable at all. Wireless charging systems along the roads , so you won' t have to charge your Tessa/apple car, etc. Just drive , and it is charging while you drive, etc.
Apple putting it in a case in 2 years is plausible, they won' t put it in the iphone itself, it is expensive tech, that will eat too much into margins. They will let the buyer decide and pay more, if they want it.
Although Apple doesn't market it as "fast charging", when you turn on Low Power mode and put your phone on the charger, it sends a continuous charge to your battery as opposed to the trickle-charge that is the default method of charging your battery. I recently learned this and have since done that if I ever need a quick juice-up before going out on the town.Darn, so that more or less confirms that there won't be any wireless charging option this year. I guess if they can make it truly wireless then it's for sure worth another year wait. Just please bring fast charging
Hopefully there's a standalone version for people who don't have an iMac on their bedside table. Otherwise it's:If this would have only a few feet of range, it would make sense to have this in the stand of iMacs.
Time for a sequel to this:Hm, I'm not terribly excited about long range wireless charging, health wise.
The standard iPhone charger is 5W. The allowed output of a wifi base station is 200mW tops, mostly 100mW.
Max output of a mobile phone is around 1W, and at that point, researchers are arguing wether that is dangerous in the long run, or not, when held close to the body.
So, to actually be able to charge a battery and not just stop it from draining one would probably need to receive 1W at least.
Considering that, the "focused RF beam" would need to be scary strong to actually produce 1W when absorbed by the phone.
Toll roads. Toll roads everywhere lol.Next year would be too early anyway.
People don' t realize, how much research there has to be done for long term effect on health, etc.
It can' t be that there is electricity in the air without some radiation or other effects, magnetic fields, etc.
I , for one, don' t have a good feeling about it.
If it checks out, and it is good, it will be world changing though, and will shake up the entire tech industry.
In the long run, and tech improves, no more power cable at all. Wireless charging systems along the roads , so you won' t have to charge your Tessa/apple car, etc. Just drive , and it is charging while you drive, etc.
Apple putting it in a case in 2 years is plausible, they won' t put it in the iphone itself, it is expensive tech, that will eat too much into margins. They will let the buyer decide and pay more, if they want it.
Same thing you do with an Apple Watch. Except Apple keeps that little kit locked away. Remains to be seen how iPhone inolentstion would play out.What do you do then when the phone locks up and needs to be connected to a PC in order for a full restore???
Why can't you?Wish I could just skip a year
Oh separately as well for sure. But it would be great to have it included in the iMacs and other devices that are always plugged in. On a side note I also wish the stand alone displays could do more, like be able to AirPlay video to them from an iOS device without a Mac being connected.Hopefully there's a standalone version for people who don't have an iMac on their bedside table. Otherwise it's:
"Wireless charging included free with the iPhone with purchase of a charging base. Charging base starts at $1,099 (with a 5400 rpm HDD)."
Although Apple doesn't market it as "fast charging", when you turn on Low Power mode and put your phone on the charger, it sends a continuous charge to your battery as opposed to the trickle-charge that is the default method of charging your battery. I recently learned this and have since done that if I ever need a quick juice-up before going out on the town.
It would require the same charging cube you currently carry with you, which would radiate the power field within a limited area.