Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Could this work both ways? Could the phone receive power when near one of these chargers as well as send power to a device like the Apple Watch? If the watch could charge this way, as long as you keep your phone topped off you would never have to remove and charge your watch again. The watch and phone would WattUp at the coffee shop and the watch would WattUp when away from a standard charger.

Knowing absolutely nothing ( :D ), I'd guess no. I bet it's much less efficient on the charger end and would be too much for an iPhone's battery. I think the Qi chargers are around 60% efficient, so it seems like charging across a distance would start at even less. To start. But who knows maybe it could/would only work when your iPhone is plugged in, then you'd just lay the watch next to it or sit near it!
 
What do you do then when the phone locks up and needs to be connected to a PC in order for a full restore???

Magnetic, inductive connection, like the Watch uses for charging. Likely via the Smart Connector. The Apple watch only has a wireless interface for this purpose, although it does have some hidden "diagnostic" ports which the iPhone could have as well. I have actually speculated that the fake speaker grille is in fact a variation on the Smart Connector, but that's just wishful thinking. It's too different from what they've already introduced on the iPads and locks them into a particular design configuration that can't be easily moved around.
 
Last edited:
I find it rediculous that we are looking at the 2017 iPhone as the real upgrade from the 2014 iphone.

If you don't think the tech in the 7 is in a lot of ways much better than in the 6 you're crazy. The form and design may be the same but the internal tech will be insanely better. The 6s is already in a lot of ways a much better phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
This long range charging should have a way to let people not wanting charge their phones opt out and shield the EM field from getting to them.
 
Wireless charging from an optional case might be the reason for the three connector dots seen on the back of some iPhone 7 prototypes.
 
Darn, so that more or less confirms that there won't be any wireless charging option this year. I guess if they can make it truly wireless then it's for sure worth another year wait. Just please bring fast charging
Wish I could just skip a year
 
If this would have only a few feet of range, it would make sense to have this in the stand of iMacs.
 
Next year would be too early anyway.
People don' t realize, how much research there has to be done for long term effect on health, etc.
It can' t be that there is electricity in the air without some radiation or other effects, magnetic fields, etc.
I , for one, don' t have a good feeling about it.
If it checks out, and it is good, it will be world changing though, and will shake up the entire tech industry.

In the long run, and tech improves, no more power cable at all. Wireless charging systems along the roads , so you won' t have to charge your Tessa/apple car, etc. Just drive , and it is charging while you drive, etc.

Apple putting it in a case in 2 years is plausible, they won' t put it in the iphone itself, it is expensive tech, that will eat too much into margins. They will let the buyer decide and pay more, if they want it.

Research is very limited when it comes to new tech. Rarely done before anyway and only on animal subjects, unfortunately.
"Human trials" are basically done when that tech goes mainstream, as it is now with Wifi & Cellular RF radiation.
Interesting reads about that subject here http://www.electricsense.com/198/is-wifi-safe/

Spreading induction charging beyond the few centimetres that is currently done, could pose much greater health issues long-term. http://www.earthcalm.com/is-the-newest-wireless-charging-technology-safe

Spin this further to grid power and Tesla's (the inventor not the car manufacturer) dream of transmitting full on power to houses and industry from distant power plants could then become reality. Wonder what that will do to our biology and the environment.

Infertility? Maybe one solution to overpopulation.
 
Darn, so that more or less confirms that there won't be any wireless charging option this year. I guess if they can make it truly wireless then it's for sure worth another year wait. Just please bring fast charging
Although Apple doesn't market it as "fast charging", when you turn on Low Power mode and put your phone on the charger, it sends a continuous charge to your battery as opposed to the trickle-charge that is the default method of charging your battery. I recently learned this and have since done that if I ever need a quick juice-up before going out on the town.
 
If this would have only a few feet of range, it would make sense to have this in the stand of iMacs.
Hopefully there's a standalone version for people who don't have an iMac on their bedside table. Otherwise it's:

"Wireless charging included free with the iPhone with purchase of a charging base. Charging base starts at $1,099 (with a 5400 rpm HDD)."
 
I think this would definitely push auto manufacturers to become more involved into integrating something like this into a vehicle. Eventually the Apple Car would incorporate this.
 
Hm, I'm not terribly excited about long range wireless charging, health wise.
The standard iPhone charger is 5W. The allowed output of a wifi base station is 200mW tops, mostly 100mW.
Max output of a mobile phone is around 1W, and at that point, researchers are arguing wether that is dangerous in the long run, or not, when held close to the body.
So, to actually be able to charge a battery and not just stop it from draining one would probably need to receive 1W at least.
Considering that, the "focused RF beam" would need to be scary strong to actually produce 1W when absorbed by the phone.
Time for a sequel to this:
(00:20 onwards)
 
Next year would be too early anyway.
People don' t realize, how much research there has to be done for long term effect on health, etc.
It can' t be that there is electricity in the air without some radiation or other effects, magnetic fields, etc.
I , for one, don' t have a good feeling about it.
If it checks out, and it is good, it will be world changing though, and will shake up the entire tech industry.

In the long run, and tech improves, no more power cable at all. Wireless charging systems along the roads , so you won' t have to charge your Tessa/apple car, etc. Just drive , and it is charging while you drive, etc.

Apple putting it in a case in 2 years is plausible, they won' t put it in the iphone itself, it is expensive tech, that will eat too much into margins. They will let the buyer decide and pay more, if they want it.
Toll roads. Toll roads everywhere lol.
[doublepost=1473209181][/doublepost]
What do you do then when the phone locks up and needs to be connected to a PC in order for a full restore???
Same thing you do with an Apple Watch. Except Apple keeps that little kit locked away. Remains to be seen how iPhone inolentstion would play out.
[doublepost=1473209271][/doublepost]
Wish I could just skip a year
Why can't you?
 
Hopefully there's a standalone version for people who don't have an iMac on their bedside table. Otherwise it's:

"Wireless charging included free with the iPhone with purchase of a charging base. Charging base starts at $1,099 (with a 5400 rpm HDD)."
Oh separately as well for sure. But it would be great to have it included in the iMacs and other devices that are always plugged in. On a side note I also wish the stand alone displays could do more, like be able to AirPlay video to them from an iOS device without a Mac being connected.
Edit: basically have AppleTV functions
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: doelcm82
Although Apple doesn't market it as "fast charging", when you turn on Low Power mode and put your phone on the charger, it sends a continuous charge to your battery as opposed to the trickle-charge that is the default method of charging your battery. I recently learned this and have since done that if I ever need a quick juice-up before going out on the town.

I don't think so - you're just charging faster because you are drawing less power while charging. If you really want to charge quickly, just use an iPad charger and charge your phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cjt3007
Can't wait.

Long-range wireless charging will be awesome. It would also be good if the iPhone could not only be charged wirelessly, but also charge other devices, like an Apple Watch, wireless earbuds, a friends phone or augmented reality glasses, when you are on the run.

Perhaps there could even be a credit system. So when you walk on the streets or sit on the bus, your phone will sell power to other phones, and when your phone gets below 20% it will buy power. When you are at home, the office or McDonald's it will power up.

Nobody will worry about their phones not being charged. It will just happen in the background, similar to how a phone connects to different base stations when you move around. You don't notice, it seems like it's connected to the same thing all the time.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't mind seeing wireless charging BUT not extended range wireless charging like that. Health concerns.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.