swingerofbirch
macrumors 68040
The Apple TV was announced and released before the original iPhone. I can't stand the smugness of Dedui, but he normally has his facts right.
When your only money making item is a phone and you have no other diversity, you can only ride that wave for so long before it vanishes. Apple is skating on thin ice and they need to diversify and bolster their current offerings and stop relying so heavily on ONE device to keep them going.
Does that mean Apple made $71 revenue and sent you 70%? Or are there lots of hidden fees that make it worthless?
Uh?
The iPhone is far from being the only profitable business of the firm. At the contrary, every sector Apple competes in is profitable, from Services, which are enormously up YOY, to the Apple Watch (it's the size of Rolex), to Beats hardware to the iPad to obviously the Mac. Not to mention the billion-dollar business just launched with the AirPods.
Contrast this to Google, Facebook that get >95% revenues from the advertising trick. Everything else they do is losing them vast amounts of money, just check out Alphabet X' impressive list of high profile failures.
The iPhone is huge and unmatched, so all the other revenue streams look small in comparison, but having a huge and unmatched business is not a liability, it's a plus.
Most of the people on this forum have this false sense of entitlement, almost like Apple owes them something. They complain about not getting new mac pros and that every new iPhone isn't earth shattering and the products they release don't cater to their very unique specific demands.
Apple is a company that runs for profit, end of story, if ditching all computers is what makes them more profitable then I promise you they will do that. Put yourself in the shoes of a CEO, you owe it to your company and your shareholders to make the most amount of money possible because at the end of the day that's all that matters.
So is Google skating on thin ice too since 90% of their revenue is from advertising?
Which makes zero business sense, because we NEED the Mac and Xcode to create those spiffy apps in the first place.
It seems that 3/4 of the people on this forum think that Apple is doomed and Tim Cook should be fired, and that the key to Apple's turnaround is to turn the iPad into a Surface Pro and to make Macs more like Hackintoshes.
No amount of evidence, such as this article, will convince them that Apple is doing fine and making good choices that are popular with customers. They want their inch-thick iPad with mouse support and a file system, they want their Mac with a GTX 1080. And unless Apple delivers these things to them ASAP, Apple is doomed and Tim Cook is the worst.
In an alternate, but very possible universe, the iPhone got crushed by Android. Developers flocked to Android-first or Android-only. Apple tried to stop the hemorrhage by creating cheap iPhone models, that ultimately devalued the brand, thus spiraling down even more.
In this universe, thankfully, Apple is a very well run company, and the iPhone thrived, leaving only the market scraps to the competition.
It's the only ecosystem I've managed to teach my parents
Actually they made $ 50 and sent me $ 35. To be displayed in the App Store costs $ 99 developer program fee (per year). In total I lost $ 64 last year to Apple. But whenever I want to take down my app I get some upset emails from avid customers who can't download it anymore. Might still take it down this year, to spend $ 60+ every year just to maintain a great (but unknown) app seems ludicrous.Does that mean Apple made $71 revenue and sent you 70%? Or are there lots of hidden fees that make it worthless?
A customer is a customer.Apple only want 'Crème de la crème' customers.
In an alternate, but very possible universe, the iPhone got crushed by Android. Developers flocked to Android-first or Android-only. Apple tried to stop the hemorrhage by creating cheap iPhone models, that ultimately devalued the brand, thus spiraling down even more.
In this universe, thankfully, Apple is a very well run company, and the iPhone thrived, leaving only the market scraps to the competition.
Mine was paid by Amex. 15 times.I'm so pleased that my total contribution to the App Store of $4.99 will be useful in them in reaching this target (sic)
Apple only want 'Crème de la crème' customers.
It's just sad that such a rich company is incapable of multi-tasking. It betrays a lack of imaginative leadership at Apple.The answer to why the entire Mac lineup is lagging.
We want high performance affordable Macs again, like they used to be not very long ago. "Affordable" meaning not cheap but high in value.It seems that 3/4 of the people on this forum think that Apple is doomed and Tim Cook should be fired, and that the key to Apple's turnaround is to turn the iPad into a Surface Pro and to make Macs more like Hackintoshes.
No amount of evidence, such as this article, will convince them that Apple is doing fine and making good choices that are popular with customers. They want their inch-thick iPad with mouse support and a file system, they want their Mac with a GTX 1080. And unless Apple delivers these things to them ASAP, Apple is doomed and Tim Cook is the worst.
The reason iOS on the iPad doesn't have a file system goes back to Steve jobs. This is one of the not so rare instances in which cook is continuing to follow jobs leads and gets criticism.That is demonstrably untrue. Apple have utterly abandoned the professional computer users who used to drop hundreds of thousands on Mac hardware.
[doublepost=1484243466][/doublepost]
It's just sad that such a rich company is incapable of multi-tasking. It betrays a lack of imaginative leadership at Apple.
[doublepost=1484244333][/doublepost]
We want high performance affordable Macs again, like they used to be not very long ago. "Affordable" meaning not cheap but high in value.
A file system on an iPad would rock but if you're afraid of one you don't have to use it. I'm not sure where you get the inch thick idea from, I guess since we criticize Apple's purportedly professional Macs for being unnecessarily thin you wrongly believe we want everything thick.
The iPad is one of the few devices left which IMO needs to be even thinner and lighter. The iPhone is plenty thin, it just needs smaller bezels and perhaps one iPhone model could be a bit thicker to house a better camera module. A very large swath of the market would rather the focus shift from Thinner to longer battery life and increased durability. Durability could well be the next "arms race" among smartphone makers. Imagine if you didn't have to handle your smartphone like a delicate flower, if a case were only needed to prevent cosmetic scuffing. 20 years from now I will be shocked if everyone still carries around delicate hardware.
None of those criticisms mean Apple are doomed. That's just ridiculous. I haven't heard anyone seriously say Apple are in danger of bankruptcy since the 90s.