Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The original or the lame reboot?

I grew up watching the original, Tuesday nights were me arguing with my mom about watching Magnum P.I. rather than whatever baseball game she wanted to watch; my argument was that she could get the baseball scores the next day, I would have to wait for summer reruns to hopefully see any missed episodes...!

It’s California, it needs to be Lance White in a white Eldorado convertible or Jim Rockford in a brown Firebird Esprit.

Jimbo, for sure, with his little printing press...!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjs916
I wonder if the settlement amount comes anywhere close to what Lancaster got for stealing it in the first place. Regardless, he must have $cash to be able to afford satisfying Apple Legal.
 
"Lancaster had access to secretive information..."

I do not think that word means what you think it means.
I‘m afraid it’s a rule/disease especially prevalent in, but by no means exclusive to, American online editing. If you can add one or two extra syllables to a normal word and get away with it still meaning the same thing, you must always do it. My pupils sometimes do it in their essays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnappleRumors
Obviously with good reason.
[Re surveillance at work]

Yeah without saying too much, I work in an environment where every keystroke is logged and it's not as creepy as some may assume.

I'm good friends with the guys in IT security (who they're very selective about to make sure there's a trust relationship) and I'm confident they don't have the time or interest to be inappropriately snooping around. They wouldn't have access anyway as they'd need to get cleared in order to access it.

In short, I'd only be scared if I was trying to do something very dodgy. Not sure where others work and all but IMO a lot of workplaces are just like this these days because people do steal/misuse stuff and you wanna be able to prove it when it happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyanite
Man working at that company has got to be so uncomfortable - always under surveillance. Never trusted.
Say what? That’s like a like kid faking a tummy ache to skip school, pouting and saying “nobody trusts me.” There’s clear evidence here that this man was trusted too much (attending meetings he wasn’t supposed to be in) and then he sold that information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjs916
Wonder if Apple has Magnum PI tracking down leads on possible saboteur employees out there. Chasin’ down leakers in a Ferrari 308.
Yes!

Cook be like Higgins, Cue is T.C. … unsure I’d give Craig to be Magnum though but closest fit.

THIS should be a short opening to the next WWDC!

He got off easy.
Facts!
The guy was a thief and lucky he didn’t wind up in jail.

Here is the thing. Apple usually pushes for criminal action on things like this. A news site reporter buys an unreleased iPhone 4, published photos and findings never claiming it’s his … goes to jail site is down!

This guy steals TRADE SECRETS and Apple gets money back?!? Like WTH?!

So what does Apple really do with the money? Moreover, what’s to say the really juicy and useful secrets haven’t been leaked prior to the deal?! Does this prevent Apple from a criminal court proceeding? (Unsure if I used the right word there)

This guy made THAT much money from Apple and he’s got it like that (connections) to be this protected to negotiate a settlement yet no criminal charges?

Now Apple closed this chapter what changes to project X will be done to improve it so much more that any competition couldn’t even touch them using these leaked trade secrets?

I kinda feel the iPhone X was project “X”
 
  • Love
Reactions: 1557750
I‘m afraid it’s a rule/disease especially prevalent in, but by no means exclusive to, American online editing. If you can add one or two extra syllables to a normal word and get away with it still meaning the same thing, you must always do it. My pupils sometimes do it in their essays.

Yep. An extra syllable or two sounds more authoritative and edjamacated.

I got a chuckle out of a person who would edit their post and for the edit reason would always note: “edification.”
 
Last edited:
Yes!

Cook be like Higgins, Cue is T.C. … unsure I’d give Craig to be Magnum though but closest fit.

THIS should be a short opening to the next WWDC!


Facts!


Here is the thing. Apple usually pushes for criminal action on things like this. A news site reporter buys an unreleased iPhone 4, published photos and findings never claiming it’s his … goes to jail site is down!

This guy steals TRADE SECRETS and Apple gets money back?!? Like WTH?!

So what does Apple really do with the money? Moreover, what’s to say the really juicy and useful secrets haven’t been leaked prior to the deal?! Does this prevent Apple from a criminal court proceeding? (Unsure if I used the right word there)

This guy made THAT much money from Apple and he’s got it like that (connections) to be this protected to negotiate a settlement yet no criminal charges?

Now Apple closed this chapter what changes to project X will be done to improve it so much more that any competition couldn’t even touch them using these leaked trade secrets?

I kinda feel the iPhone X was project “X”
We’ll likely never know the real scoop on this.
 
  • Love
Reactions: DeepIn2U
It is a crime, not just civil, to buy favorable reporting to pump the value of an investment. And it's a crime for the journalist/publisher for their part. There needs to be prosecutions.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.