The man is a multiple time National Award winner with work ranging from Shakespeare adaptations to social awareness shorts. And he only started writing screenplays and directing movies after a close to two decades of being a Bollywood composer.
I got 230MB/s from my SD card/ usbc adapter, this is almost 5 times higher than the 39MB/s I get from the lighting in the mega top 1600USD iPhone Pro Max.
Does it? You're aware that there was certainly much more equipment involved than just an iPhone. Maybe some additional lenses, rigs, microphones etc.
Where can I find it on Apple's own site? They couldn't bother to put an article about it in their Newsroom and search the website for Fursat only returns the soundtrack.
its not, you can achieve much better results with a 500USD A6300 and some budget lens.
Could be, but I think the idea is not that the filmmaker would buy a separate iPhone for the project, but that they would put their phone on airplane mode and just shoot with the phone they already have, so there's no extra cost (especially important if you're trying to shoot something with volunteer help for less than $1,000). And when I shoot off an iphone I airdrop the footage to a nearby Mac every time there's a break so that I don't run out of space.
I would buy that if the movie's visuals felt in any way intentionally poor. They don't to me, it just feels like the production tries to get the best out of the limited equipment available. They don't play with the limitations of it or use it to achieve a certain effect. Now that's just me, you may see that differently and that's fine, but I see no artistic value in this whatsoever.
We have poor quality products from at least a decade, at least from software side...
And then? Usually the iphone rising prices are, as said by apple, caused by the continuosly better camera. Well, I HATE MAKING PHOTOS! the only photos i make are items i have to sell online, so why i should spend so much money for a f....n camera??? Gimme a 2mp camera and sell me that iphone for half of the price, and ill be fine!
I guess it depends on who you talk to. I hear nothing but problems from Android and Microsoft users so compared to them, Apple is still king. But I do wish Apple had better competition to force them to innovate more and fix bugs faster too. They sometimes get complacent and lazy as market leaders.
That’s got nothing to do with anything. Talk about off topic! Who cares what your personal needs are, in relation to this thread? If apple don’t sell you the product you want, go buy from someone else. SMH.
Lots of Debbie Downers on here. Mac Rumor's members will always find something to whine about. I really liked it. Visually stunning, great choreography and music, a nice story, they packed so much into 30 minutes I could scarcely believe it was that short. And speaking of Bollywood everyone should see R-R-R. I's amazing.
its ON topic instead, because apple shares these stupid videos just to say "our phones are expensive because u can make a movie with them". Most people make stupid photos with their phones, while pros will rather buy a professional camera. I mean, with 1500€ u can get a good reflex and get far more better results than the best of the phones.
from what ive heard windows has advanced a lot in last years, while apple, by my personal experience get worse at every update. In fact every time i get a new device i install the latest os and dont touch it until its end of life. when i began my apple odyssey, i was proud of it, everything was superior, now i only think that im stuck in it because of the ecosystem, and switching back to windows can be painful.
Cool. But you’re missing the point. They’re not saying “buy this phone in place of a pro set up”, nor are they saying that “this phone is better than a pro set up”.
Fact is that iphone s camera isnt the best right now, meaning u can make same movie using another, cheaper, android. U can use even older phones as there were many other movies shotted with an iphone in the past. So all these new movies are only “reminders” to what ive said above. Why other brands are cheaper while offering equal or better camera? Because dont waste money in similar “ads” that WE pay for.
So you’re suggesting the ad in the op is lacking in quality? I don’t agree. For a phone it’s incredible footage, and incredible quality. It’s perfectly acceptable quality to shoot budget films with. And it’s an iPhone ad. I fail to see what any other camera or phone manufacturer has to do with it.
Even movies and photos from pro gear under goes post production (PP). If you both watching the original unprocess footage from professional cameras, you'd be shock at how dull everything looks. If anything, the PP crew has a harder time due to significantly less data [in the iPhone footage] to push and pull to get the just right final product. Professional gear usually saves at 16-bit per pixel, while consumer saves at 8-bit per pixel.
1) i dont say its bad quality. I say that not only an iphone is capable to make a similar movie.
This is a ridiculous conversation. Yes of course other products can do the same thing. And yes, of course apple (or anyone) isn’t mentioning them in their adverts.
