Which ones would those be? Cause in the phones, the Android Flagships are just as expensive as the iPhone. A GOOD tablet is just as expensive as an iPad, etc....
in canada, if i want an iphone, i would have to go on a 'max' plan contract - $85/month for a 1gb plan. Plus the $300-$400 upfront.
in contrast, for a high end android - HTC One M8, S5, I don't have to go on that 'max' plan' and can instead go for a more reasonable plan of around $75/month for a 2gb. With a lower up front cost to boot - $250-$300.
you might say, what about the older 5s? still, same $85/month 'max contract', just a lower up front cost.
----------
In defense of the person replying to your message, it is not "stalking" when using the forum's tools to click on a user's name to see other posts. In fact, I believe it is a good idea to see who you are dealing with when posting a reply.
To get back on topic... I liked the ad, and I found the "making of" video pretty cool.
the issue was that that beats post was made a long time ago...
----------
I'm glad Apple did EXACTLY the opposite of what you suggested. Otherwise they wouldn't be as successful as they are today as a company.
Don't believe me? Ask HP and Dell how they are doing.
actually, the iphone only took off when it became $199 as opposed to the $599 original asking price.
$199 was more in line with competitors.
same story with the ipod, the macbook, everything.
you cant price something above market if you dont have differentiation. in the past, that iphone differentiation was there, today, i argue, not so much.
people dont really see iphone as the superior product anymore - as in the past.
the purpose of adverts like this is to reintroduce that differentiation, more in the angle of experience vs. specs and features. but i think this ad isnt really effective in that way - how many normal pople will actually use their phone as portrayed?
last year's was more realistic.