re better source suppliers
i'm all for it
" i buy expensive suits. they just look cheap on me..." - warren buffett
i'm all for it
" i buy expensive suits. they just look cheap on me..." - warren buffett
This.
Funny that we have to keep repeating this, isn't it?
Yes, we talk a lot about the hypotheticals, which is enjoyable, but some folks actually think Samsung would somehow exact "revenge" on Apple by messing with supply, deadlines, etc. It just isn't how things work in the real world.
It is also likely that the division / department responsible for making the Samsung tablets is totally separate from the group making the panels themselves.
Makes little difference when the finished products have market lifespans of a quarter. Which is why so many CE products are junk. And so many companies are having financial issues.In a single quarter perhaps, but over the long term finished products generally have much higher margins than components, which is why so many components makers also produce consumer products.
Anyone know how one would find out if their iPad 2 LCD Display is from LG or Samsung?
Interesting how a company that it is currently suing, is also the savior for the product for which they are suing to protect.
Interesting how a company that it is currently suing, is also the savior for the product for which they are suing to protect.
I Hope Imac 27" is next...those LG panels are crap since the October 2009 release!!!!
I love how all the Mac-Zealots ignore these types of threads.
Makes perfect sense. Samsung's LCD manufacturing is a separate entity from the corporate parent. And it's totally normal for companies suing each other to still work together. It'd be petty and amateurish to do otherwise. And neither company got to their current size by acting stupid.
It's BS. Samsung's LCD manufacturing is part of Samsung Electronics as is their mobile unit.
It's just as separate as Apple's iPhone unit is separate from their corporate parent
the vj said:Interesting how a company that it is currently suing, is also the savior for the product for which they are suing to protect.
Politics: Samsung clearly could stop creating displays for Apple, on the other hand Apple is doing a gentlemen agreement:
"Do not copy our products but we are not going to kill you, we know is the fault of one of your departments, not the entire company".
You do not know when Apple may need or needed from Samsung. At the end, Apple is where it is as well because of the collaboration with their partners.
I wish people would read this story and FINALLY get what I and others have been trying to say about Apple and Samsung's relationship. They are two large companies that have multiple disputes and multiple agreements. They both need each other, but they will also sue if they feel their intellectual property is being infringed upon.
I'm so tired of reading articles from tech pundits about how Apple will probably start phasing out Samsung for production in the near future.
Here is direct proof that they don't work like that.
I love how all the Mac-Zealots ignore these types of threads.
I love how all the Mac-Zealots ignore these types of threads.
There's nothing to ignore. Samsung the Supplier is still . . . a supplier. And given the insane amount of demand for Apple's products, they stand to cash in.
The pundits are totally wrong. It's not Apple, It's Samsung that will start phasing out Apple as their customer.
Interesting how a company that it is currently suing, is also the savior for the product for which they are suing to protect.
Indeed, and there's that fact that the displays come from Samsung Mobile Display whereas Apple sued Samsung Electronics. I just love how all the Mac/Apple/Steve Jobs/Apple fan haters will instantly spit out blatantly gross and juvenile religious and sexual imageries to describe people.
Who are all owned by? Samsung thats right!