Apple should buy Mordy's UI/site. The site was great!
Exactly. The right thing to do would have been to pay this guy a 'finder's fee' and create a similar page or pages on the Apple Store website.
Apple should buy Mordy's UI/site. The site was great!
Apple obviously has its reasons that may not be apparent. For one, this information is valuable to marketers of competing products to show popularity of different models/sizes/colors/carries - information that Apple never releases when they announce their sales numbers. In addition, I'm sure they are constantly hammering Apple's site to scrape this availability information.
exactly.Sounds like a cool tool, but I'm guessing Apple would rather people hunt for that information on their site as it might lead to other sales.
Refurb.me has be going for years, scraping the Apple refurbished store. Why hasn't Apple ordered that shutdown???
Refurb.me has be going for years, scraping the Apple refurbished store. Why hasn't Apple ordered that shutdown???
If I read the terms of use correctly, I am prohibited from using the tool in Safari to select the region of the page on Apple's site that shows the availability and displaying on my dashboard. Couldn't I just clip the pages for all the stores in a given area and keep track of them?
I remember when Steve (RIP) demoed this feature and showed how he could keep track of his daily Calvin and Hobbs cartoon and even an eBay auction. So in the case of eBay, it's OK to monitor another site, but not your own?!?
This has been shut down to prevent scalpers flooding stores. Store A shows phones in stock, so that store has a massive queue of scalpers at 6am.
Tbh, the more Apple do to stop scalpers easily getting phones the better.
Having an adequate supply at launch and beyond would stop scalping in an instant. Or not letting people buy 10 phones at a time.
How can a site have terms of use that say what you can't do with data that site posts?
I have never read the terms of use for apple.com. What if it said "every person who visits this site must pay $0.02 per minute"?
Is that enforceable any more than what this scraper does/did?
I understand copyright on pictures and other works but inventory? How is that "protected" once the original company puts in out for consumption?
I like Apple and would not want to face them, but as others here said, it was a better mousetrap.
----------
<opinion>.
Your Use of the Site. You may not use any deep-link, page-scrape, robot, spider or other automatic device, program, algorithm or methodology, or any similar or equivalent manual process, to access, acquire, copy or monitor any portion of the Site or any Content, or in any way reproduce or circumvent the navigational structure or presentation of the Site or any Content, to obtain or attempt to obtain any materials, documents or information through any means not purposely made available through the Site. Apple reserves the right to bar any such activity.
This has been shut down to prevent scalpers flooding stores. Store A shows phones in stock, so that store has a massive queue of scalpers at 6am.
Tbh, the more Apple do to stop scalpers easily getting phones the better.
Just how often was the bot hitting the server? In order to maintain accurate data, it would have to be hitting it constantly. Otherwise it would be inaccurate.
You may disagree with Apple here, but they have a right to ensure accurate information about their stock is displayed correctly, and they have the right to ensure a bot isn't hitting their servers every 10 seconds scanning every configuration and possibly slowing down performance for users of the site itself.
Exactly. The right thing to do would have been to pay this guy a 'finder's fee' and create a similar page or pages on the Apple Store website.