Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What's with Apple's laptops and cameras?? It's like they've decided to hold on to the crappy decade-old cameras until a year when they have nothing else to add. It really is ridiculous.
It's an issue across the board for laptop manufacturers. It's rare for any laptops to have cameras with good optics or even 1080p with any level of performance. Before 2020, most people who regularly did video conferencing just got an external camera. This year is different. Apple should have stepped up and put in a better quality camera (although there are space constraints -- their engineers could have figured it out though). Sticking with a lower quality 720p camera at the end of 2020 is lazy at best.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: jezbd1997
Still no confirmation of how many monitors are supported on the TB ports.
If you check the tech specs it's sadly only 1 over TB, and an extra over the HDMI port on the Mini... MacBooks only support 1. Quite a drawback, these are not for Pros and very early releases... I am quite surprised they were happy releasing these with support for only 1 TB display
 
"but... but... but... the Air is fanless so it must be thermal throttling like hell... right? Right? RIGHT??"
The Verge test shows the Air throttling a little bit, especially the 30 minutes Cinebench test where it falls behind 20% off the Pro. Even the Pro throttles a little bit compared to the mini which has the best thermal headroom.

However I don’t think that’s a huge use case and Air should be perfectly fine for 99% of people. No need to throttle if all your tasks complete in under a minute.
 
It's an issue across the board for laptop manufacturers. It's rare for any to have 1080p cameras. Before 2020, most people who regularly did video conferencing just got an external camera. This year is different. Apple should have stepped up and put in a better quality camera (although there are space constraints -- their engineers could have figured it out though).
No space constraints, they could've if they wanted. It was likely just a cost thing as Apple always does...
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: PickUrPoison
I’m wondering apps on the M1 will relaunch when memory is low like it does on the iOS?
Can anyone check to see if there is a /var/vm folder and swap files?
 
Traditionally the mini has been a laptop motherboard in a mini case, so performance should be marginally better than the corresponding laptop model. It's the mbp m1 in a box, which is about right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy James
I don't get the comment about the Mac Mini's power supply. Apple probably didn't redesign it, that's all. When they do the design refresh I'm sure they will. Just because it has a 150W PSU, doesn't mean it draws 150W. In fact, Anandtech measured it drawing just over 4W at idle, and 31W under full load.
 
It's an issue across the board for laptop manufacturers. It's rare for any to have 1080p cameras. Before 2020, most people who regularly did video conferencing just got an external camera. This year is different. Apple should have stepped up and put in a better quality camera (although there are space constraints -- their engineers could have figured it out though).

I'll completely disagree here. Almost every laptop in the same class has a 1080P camera.
 
What's with Apple's laptops and cameras?? It's like they've decided to hold on to the crappy decade-old cameras until a year when they have nothing else to add. It really is ridiculous.
The camera is beyond any negative adjectives I can imagine. However, the problem is not it being old. The problem is not it being only 720p (the image would’ve be even worse at 1080p).

Apple decided to prefer thinness over image quality. Laws of practical optics tell us that an extremely thin camera cannot have good image quality. (I am not saying “laws of physics”, as non-conventional optics might be able to provide some answers in the future.)
 
I don't get the comment about the Mac Mini's power supply. Apple probably didn't redesign it, that's all. When they do the design refresh I'm sure they will. Just because it has a 150W PSU, doesn't mean it draws 150W. In fact, Anandtech measured it drawing just over 4W at idle, and 31W under full load.
Haha. I guess they could’ve gone with usb-c power cable with 60W brick :) If they’ve done that I could’ve powered it directly from my monitor usb-c output.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dasjati
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.