The big difference between the gains now and the gains of 10-20 years ago is power consumption vs performance.well many here had high expectations of the 3nm. But seeing the numbers from Apple now for the A17 I don’t know what to expect for a 2nm. I am not hyped
Apple's big wigs are mostly white males. Apple is more concerned about showing how diverse they are to prevent from being canceled.From the wonderlust event, even Apple themselves didn't wheel out the big wigs to announce the A17 pro chip.
I don't know how everyone else felt?
But to me the A17 pro announcement felt rather flat as if Apple themselves weren't quite as excited about this chip as we all expected them to be.
This is why I prefer to replace my Macs, iPads & Watch 8-10 years later after their final Security Update.so 3-4 years for 3-2nm, and the move from 5-3nm gave a real world increase of 0-10%. Basically looks like we'll get 10-20% increase after the next 5 years, i.e 2-3% per year?
Yeah, I was one of those, and I have to admit I’m still hyped for the upcoming N3E and especially for this new 2nm process coming on 2026. I really hope the switch to 2nm with the new transistor architecture will provide a big jump, that Apple will probably dose over several incremental upgrades… Yeah, we shouldn’t be so hyped.well many here had high expectations of the 3nm. But seeing the numbers from Apple now for the A17 I don’t know what to expect for a 2nm. I am not hyped
The 2nm will be All Around Gate, so we can expect a bigger performance improvement. TSMC didn't go for it with 3nm as the stride was too big a step. But, let's wait for actual tests on the processor as Apple may have decided to limit the speed improvement, by giving the power reduction more emphasis.well many here had high expectations of the 3nm. But seeing the numbers from Apple now for the A17 I don’t know what to expect for a 2nm. I am not hyped
Actually looks like Intel is ahead of schedule:If Intel executes on time, its 18A node will already have entered mass production. But that's a big IF.
None of these 3nm or 2nm designations are actual measurements anymore, just branding, so they might as well call chips light years or shades of gray after they run out of nm's.Serious question. What happens when they get to 1nm? What’s the next step? .5, or some completely new technology all together?
Very good. Thank you!View attachment 2268855
Source:
- https://www.imec-int.com/en/articles/smaller-better-faster-imec-presents-chip-scaling-roadmap
- https://www.tomshardware.com/news/imec-reveals-sub-1nm-transistor-roadmap-3d-stacked-cmos-20-plans
Based on 3nm (N3) deliverables assume the die shrink to apply to the iPhone chip a year later.
They will bring them out with the M3s.From the wonderlust event, even Apple themselves didn't wheel out the big wigs to announce the A17 pro chip.
Doesn’t bother me. People complain when the speeches are too long or too short.I don't know how everyone else felt?
Picometers if you want to keep it to SI units (i.e. 1000 pm = 1 nm). But, as others have mentioned, atoms start getting pretty large on the pm scale (the atomic radius of a silicon atom is around 140 pm), and also electrons start tunnelling in unexpected ways.Angstroms are next. 1 Å = 0.1 nm
Yeah, it sure sucks that Apple lets everyone participate in the presentations. /sApple's big wigs are mostly white males. Apple is more concerned about showing how diverse they are to prevent from being canceled.
Sounds like an article to hipe down the 3nm. Everyone was looking at great jumps in performance etc. with the 3nm, but now talk begins with the 2nm, so it waters down the 3nm....Not even the time to enjoy the 3nm 🤣
Hopefully they are putting more focus with the big wigs with Macs. M1 and M2 are decent enough (I have five including some M1 Ultra and M2 Ultra Mac Studios). But they really need to up their game on the desktop side. It’s laughable that the 2023 Mac Pro has basically 2x mobile chipsFrom the wonderlust event, even Apple themselves didn't wheel out the big wigs to announce the A17 pro chip.
I don't know how everyone else felt?
But to me the A17 pro announcement felt rather flat as if Apple themselves weren't quite as excited about this chip as we all expected them to be.
The 2nm will be All Around Gate, so we can expect a bigger performance improvement. TSMC didn't go for it with 3nm as the stride was too big a step. But, let's wait for actual tests on the processor as Apple may have decided to limit the speed improvement, by giving the power reduction more emphasis.