This thread is not very surprising to me. Many posters will cheer/champion stories of success and try like hell to debunk/rationalize anything negative. Even if the story itself ISN'T negative. Like you said - this "news" can easily be explained. It's not foreboding. At least not for those paying attention. Which seems to be fewer and fewer every day...
Yes of course, it's sad that the rational explanation of such a news based on last year's financial reports will go ignored while wild theories of either "gloom and doom" or "WSJ is just a bunch of hacks!" with the occasional "Samsung sucks!" will be the discussion here.
The level of discussion really has gone down in these forums. It's impossible to actual discuss things. This is a financial story, why are we discussing anything but financial information ?
Personally I think AT&T is somewhat to blame because in years past when the new iphone came out as long as you has your old one close to a year they would let you upgrade but now they are sticking to the 18 months to upgrade. That takes out millions of folks that would like to upgrade like myself but are now not eligible. I need to wait until May or pay an additional $250 above the price of the phone, same with my daughters and wife. There is no way we are spending an extra $1000 to upgrade all 4 of us. If AT&T did it that same as in the past, we were buyers when the phone came out several months ago.
It's really simple.
iOS and tiny screens are becoming irrelevant.
Also, many are waiting for a Jailbreak.
All of this is Apple not listening to what consumers want.
Personally I think AT&T is somewhat to blame because in years past when the new iphone came out as long as you has your old one close to a year they would let you upgrade but now they are sticking to the 18 months to upgrade. That takes out millions of folks that would like to upgrade like myself but are now not eligible. I need to wait until May or pay an additional $250 above the price of the phone, same with my daughters and wife. There is no way we are spending an extra $1000 to upgrade all 4 of us. If AT&T did it that same as in the past, we were buyers when the phone came out several months ago.
But AT&T reported record sales for the quarter.![]()
Because everyone reporting on this Wall Street Journal story is pushing the meme that this is due to weak demand for iPhone 5. Of course the discussion is going to turn to Samsung, screen size, iOS being stale, etc.
...BTW, what is read on this site is not indicative of the population as a whole. Shocker, I'm sure.
Newsflash - that 18 month requirement? It's not ATT. It's Apple - and what they negotiated with ATT. Apple dictated the terms of that one.
And ATT reported record sales for SMARTPHONES. Not iPhone specifically. One reason why I objected to the headline here on MR - because that's not at all what the actual press release from ATT stated. And now people (like you) think otherwise.
AT&T said they had a record smart phone sales of both iPhone and Android:
AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) announced today that it sold more than 10 million smartphones in the fourth quarter of 2012, topping its previous record quarter of 9.4 million, set in the fourth quarter of 2011. This included best-ever quarterly sales of Android and Apple smartphones.
You know it is possible to have record iPhone sales and Android/Windows sales; it doesn't have to be one or the other.
Hey I'm not disagreeing with you but that's how this is being reported in the media. I guarantee you if you go to any tech site today the headline will be weak iPhone demand (and then the flame war comments to follow).But looking at Apple's units sales, it's apparent this isn't "weak demand", Apple's always had bursty sales of iPhones (launch quarter is insane, 2nd quarter levels off, 3rd quarter drops slightly, and on until the refresh).
What was a problem was really last year's sharp drop between Q2-Q3. Apple didn't control that one well enough and it ended up hurting them. All rational people would think Tim Cook would want to avoid a repeat this year.
Hey I'm not disagreeing with you but that's how this is being reported in the media. I guarantee you if you go to any tech site today the headline will be weak iPhone demand (and then the flame war comments to follow).
And even though this story was previously reported the stock is still down over 3% pre market. Over an apparent 'nothing to see here' story.
OK it says best ever Android and Apple quarterly sales. How else should a person read that other than both Apple and Android saw record sales?Nowhere in that statement does it single out iPhones for having the best quarterly sales. While entirely possible - that's not what the release says.
When are people gonna remember that Apple's vision is to NEVER make cheap products to compete with other companies, but to make GREAT products (at all costs) to please the consumers?
I'm very skeptical of a cheap iPhone coming any time soon.