I use HomeKit but I have no desire for this. Seems unnecessary except to show off.
I don't think Apple sets its prices things according to 3rd-party retailer sales pricing. It will likely be a better display than what's in the $329 iPad. I expect it'll be under $449 though, which I think is the iPad Apple considers the "standard". Probably be around $250-300 if I had to guess purely based on rumours and existing knowledge of their product lineups, but who knows? It'll depend on what this thing actually does, if it has any meaningful internal storage, if it's intended to be used on the go or just mounted and left on the wall, etc.An iPad can be had for $249 from many retailers on sale. You expect Apple to sell a large touch screen product for less than that? I don't.
but it would be designed to mount to walls and other objects using magnetic fasteners, so it could be positioned in the most central part of the home
You could already use an iPad this way with a wall mount, though not as convenient as you mention with an auto-launch app. (But that isn't the end of the world. I do have three iPads set up this way.)A lot of us have older iPads sitting around that would be perfect for this if Apple would release an app that autolaunches on one and runs full time.
Mainly, probably, because iPads don't have Thread. And there is no reason/use case for putting Thread in "regular" iPads, it would just be added cost.That’s what I was thinking.. Why not release an App or an Operating System that controls everything? Why do we need new hardware for this? When we already have iPads.
You're gonna trust Apple with your bottom and possibly scalding hot water??But can it be taken off the mount and carried with me wherever I go, or will I need to rely on my Apple Watch + Siri to activate my IoT-connected smart bidet? 🚽🤔
(Asking the real important questions here, considering how many MacRumors commenters type from their... thrones.)
If it couldn't be used as a regular iPad, ie, AC power was required, I think they could sell it for cheaper because it wouldn't cannibalize iPad sales.An iPad can be had for $249 from many retailers on sale. You expect Apple to sell a large touch screen product for less than that? I don't.
You can.you should be able to use any Apple device to control this ...
The iPad Air 2 I have on my wall just has Home running on it 24/7, with guided access on it so my kids can't turn it off or navigate away from it.A lot of us have older iPads sitting around that would be perfect for this if Apple would release an app that autolaunches on one and runs full time.
As I've been reading this thread, I just learned about this Guided Access... I'll have to look into it. I also have three wall mounted iPads, and just run Home on them.The iPad Air 2 I have on my wall just has Home running on it 24/7, with guided access on it so my kids can't turn it off or navigate away from it.
I see your $349 and raise you $449. 🤪It’s gonna be $349 and everyone’s gonna complain.
Save this for reference
That, and a a new Siri.Why would you ever buy this instead of an iPad?
All Apple needs to do is make the software experience for it. That's it. Any iPad can run it.
Correction * It’s going to use Siri which doesn’t work and everyone will complain.It’s gonna be $349 and everyone’s gonna complain.
Save this for reference
For that price I could get an iPadIt’s gonna be $349 and everyone’s gonna complain.
Save this for reference
You want Apple to be eco-conscious and allow you to repurpose your existing iPad. Apple just wants to sell you another device.A lot of us have older iPads sitting around that would be perfect for this if Apple would release an app that autolaunches on one and runs full time.