I'd be all over the HomePod if it could control as many devices as my echo can. I would love to get a device that has the connectivity of the echo but the fidelity of the HomePod
At the end of the day, how profitable is the Echo Dot? And perhaps just as importantly, how profitable would it be if they did not sell your data . . .
Doubt.
A version more in line with a Sonos One which retails for $199. So the sound would not be quite as good, but it would have the same premise.The current homepods build cost alone was somethig like $216. How much lower can they really go and what features could they even remove to reduce cost? It's basically just a nice speaker as it is
Definitely not a gimmick to me and clearly millions of others. I have Alexa dots all around my house, they're nice and discreet, cheap yet very effective. They and the Google units control my lights and each radiators evohome thermostat no problem at all. The commands are quick and simple and with the Google units particularly, quite conversational. Definitely quicker than searching for my phone, loading an app and changing the setting. Doubly so when my hands are full.Sorry they are gimmicks. Sure it can set a timer!!!!!!! Or I even connected my Nest thermostats to the full size Echo we have. Asking Alexa to change the temp on the upstairs Nest is slooooooooooow because Alexa/Amazon have to log into the Nest skill with my user/pass (I am sure that is private) then change the temp. I can do it much faster with my phone. Not to mention I have to be near the Alexa to do it.
All of these assistants need to be spoken to in a specific manor for them work right. All of them can be tripped up easily. The need another 5-10 years and mountains of data before you can speak to them like a normal person.
https://github.com/nfarina/homebridgeI'd be all over the HomePod if it could control as many devices as my echo can. I would love to get a device that has the connectivity of the echo but the fidelity of the HomePod
Fix your wifiI bought one to operate as a speaker from my phone, knowing that Siri was a steaming pile and not really caring about that aspect of it. The very first time I tried to play music from a playlist at a party, the music kept cutting in and out. This is about the most basic use case imaginable. What the hell, Apple?
Indeed, I bet if they compared profits on the devices Apple would be on top.Are we going to continue the myth that Apple is even attempting to be a marketshare leader in any field they play in? Who in their right mind "competes" with a product category that sells at razor thin margins?
Glad to see Google closing in on Amazon. The sooner Amazon goes away the better off we all will be.
I did not mean to imply you were stupid. Just the questions being asked. I misinterpreted your tone. With the overall negative vibe around here it seemed like more of a jab. My apologies.What point was I trying to make? Jump to conclusions much?
Someone posted “no doubt” expectations of Siri improvements. I’ve seen that a hundred times before in the many, many years since Siri was born. So much good seems as little as “just one software update away.”
So I asked Siri some questions related to that, found the answers funny and posted them. I was going for laughs. Apparently, I was too “stupid” to think trying to make others laugh is OK.
If it’s more “sensical:” I’m hoping right with the original poster that Siri will get significant upgrades in “smarts.”
Perhaps it would be better to post, “...but who makes the most profitable smart speaker” and similar so Apple can win?
Sonos is who the HomePod should be compared to. It's silly to compare the HomePod to the Echo, when (I suspect) the vast majority of Echo sales goes to the Echo Dot*, which may be "smart" but whose "speaker" quality ranks just above a tin can and a string.
The HomePod is not positioned as a "smart speaker", it's a high quality speaker for streaming music that happens to have some "smart" features. Just like the Sonos One. The Echo—especially the Echo Dot—is the opposite: a "smart" device that happens to have a speaker.
This is like comparing the sales of a MacBook Pro to a Timex digital watch. Yes, they both can tell the time—and they both have a screen!—but they serve two different purposes.
* Amazon hasn't released sales numbers or a model break down, but the Echo Dot was Amazon's best selling device in 2017.
I’m pretty sure this is not and has never been Apple’s goal, any more than their goal is to sell the most iPhones or the most home computers, any more than Mercedes-Benz has a goal of selling the most cars.Apple has a long way to go to catch up to Google and Amazon
At $349 HomePod should come with 1 years subscription to Apple Music at least. This would then lock the user into an Apple Music subscription and the hardware for future iterations.
At $349 HomePod should come with 1 years subscription to Apple Music at least. This would then lock the user into an Apple Music subscription and the hardware for future iterations.
They talk about music only because they know they cant compete.
If Siri was at the same level as the other assistants the keynote would not have been 90% music. They didn't choose it to be solely to be music-focused, they were forced to because they are behind.
Good question.
Amazon may have sold 4 million, and google 2.4 million, but how many of those units were returned after users concluded music sound quality wasn't up to snuff?
I personally love my HomePod. The hardware is great and I’m hopeful Apple can (and will) update the software and Siri over time. At $499 (Australia) yes it’s a luxury speaker first and at the moment a smart speaker second - but I’m really happy with my purchase.