Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
With the way Apple is charging for storage upgrades, Apple probably already calculated all of this. That's the beauty of having such fat margin.
Go to any OEM and upgrade the SSD (or RAM). I’m his is where ALL the OEM’s markup. Lenovo wants $300+ for 32GB of RAM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benwiggy
Apple will have a second source already lined up for the scenarios. Probably Samsung again.
did you read it, like fully? Apple purchases from Samsung now. But think it through! If WD can't produce, can you see how WD customers will go to Samsung? And can you see how this will affect apple, even if it wasn't samsung's production problem initially.
 
Inflation is most easily defeated when consumers- as a group- decide the money is worth more than whatever is being sold. When the group decides to NOT BUY, price-hikes halt and then begin coming down in search of a level where consumers decide to again trade their cash for the stuff being sold.

As is, price hikes- for any reason (logical or not)- seem to be met with consumers choosing to just pay up... thus illustrating that they do not value the money more than whatever they want to buy. This rewards sellers for trying to get more and more and more for whatever they sell.

Inflation rarely eases under this condition. It doesn't even need logical-sounding excuses. Sellers want to maximize profits. Traditional buyers want to maximize value (often by buying something that seems like a legit bargain). For the last decade+, consumers seem to have lost their self-control, opting to "just pay" whatever higher price is sought by sellers of non-essentials vs. scoffing at price increases and proving that their money is worth more than that.

True essentials fundamental to basic survival can require "just paying." Everything else- including all tech goodies- are rarely essential. If consumers as a group wake up and use their core power in capitalism, rampant inflation can quickly be tamed... and prices then pushed downward. Until then, expect higher and higher prices for any reasons... or no reasons... and sellers reporting "record revenues and profits" in spite of all of the global calamities spun to help rationalize higher prices.
 
Kioxia's statement says the issue impacts the production of its 3D BiCS flash, a product used in a wide range of SSDs and other products, but 2D flash production is not impacted. The company hopes for an "early recovery to normal operation," indicating that production has been halted. However, Kioxia did not indicate how much of its production capacity has been impacted.

Western Digital's statement provides a bit more detail, saying that the issue will reduce its production by "at least" 6.5 exabytes. Unfortunately, neither company has given a firm timeline of when production will be fully restored. However, given the long cycle times for 3D NAND flash (it can take two to three months to manufacture a 3D flash chip), any disruption will still have an impact for several months after production restarts.
 
Apple uses MLC NANDS, try to find the same capacity and speed SSD for a quarter of Apple's price, I bet you can't.
You've mentioned this twice in this thread; do you have a source for this? If true this would be genuinely interesting as there's very little MLC being used in the consumer space nowadays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
They lost me at 6.5 exabytes... how much is that?

The biggest storage space I know is terabytes.

Please educate me, my brothers and sisters
BC56FDC4-5253-470D-BDB0-3FBAD078B74E.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: jz0309
I have hard time to understand what's sort of contamination. So, my conclusion, it's a fake news, and after sometime, nobody would remember roots, but everyone would be aware that prices were "justified"
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacMediaNet
How could that much NAND be contaminated without knowing? Where was the quality control?
wafers go through 100s of process steps, there are controls along the way but when this stuff happens at one step, it doesn't necessarily show right away ... and QC did catch this, that's why the contaminated wafers were pulled out of production. Those wafers will be scrapped ...
 
if they wanna make the M1 Macs repairable just STOP soldering the SSD's in place. No Solder. That simple.

Then when these suckers wear out and they will wear out the whole computer ain't JUNK.
Have you seen the lifespan of even TLC NAND? Based on my current usage I’ll wear out the SSD in about 50 or so years.

People grossly underestimate the lifespan of SSD’s. You’re going to replace the computer long before the SSD wears out unless you are absolutely hammering the SSD with writes to an unreasonable degree. I’ve yet to have an SSD fail or have a bad sector, yet I have a box of broken hard drives cough Seagate cough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rgarjr and benwiggy
At this level of contamination and based on one other report I have seen it seems to be be chemical contamination during fabrication of the chips. Probably a contaminated input material ( e.g. process gas) or a new process recipe for fabrication that was not working as expected (less probably). This is different from an unexpected power loss. How long the contamination has been happening and is there any questionable material that has made it to finished goods is the big question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1 exabyte (EB) = = 1,000 petabytes = 1 million terabytes = 1 billion gigabytes. O


so if you think of it in a 1TB Config MacBook Pro, that's 6.5 million MacBook pros worth of 1TB storage tiers.

considering they sell about 6.5 million Macs every quarter, that impact is pretty unequivocally HUGE.
I did a back of the envelope calculation and came up with ~51 million x 1 Terabit (128 GigaByte) 3D-NAND chips or about 6.4 Million x 1 Tera byte SSD drives worth about $2.5B at street value (based on the amazon price of $400 for a 1 Tera Byte drive)
 
  • Like
Reactions: adamjackson
You've mentioned this twice in this thread; do you have a source for this? If true this would be genuinely interesting as there's very little MLC being used in the consumer space nowadays.
I don’t see a concrete source, but it seems they were rumored to have transitioned from TLC NAND to MLC NAND for the iPhone 6. I’m not interested enough to invest more than a minute or two Googling the subject, but that’s what I found.
 
if they wanna make the M1 Macs repairable just STOP soldering the SSD's in place. No Solder. That simple.

Then when these suckers wear out and they will wear out the whole computer ain't JUNK.

Most of them won't wear out in the useful life of a Mac.

My previous 2012 MacBook Pro with SSD is still in use without any problems.
 
I did a back of the envelope calculation and came up with ~51 million x 1 Terabit (128 GigaByte) 3D-NAND chips or about 6.4 Million x 1 Tera byte SSD drives worth about $2.5B at street value (based on the amazon price of $400 for a 1 Tera Byte drive)
Retail prices is not what they charge customers, it's a lot less, just saying.
 
You've mentioned this twice in this thread; do you have a source for this? If true this would be genuinely interesting as there's very little MLC being used in the consumer space nowadays.
1. There was "AFAIK" before the whole post, I deleted it, should've left it in.

2. Apple used MLC for a long time, why go back to inferior TLC or QLC.

3. Apple's SSD prices are high for a reason, using MLC is that reason imho.



I will update this post if I find a source.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.