That's not how facts work.I'm sorry, but I do not agree at all.
Oh what the internet has done to people.
That's not how facts work.I'm sorry, but I do not agree at all.
So then why did they slip in an algorithm and not tell anybody about it for months until their silence blew up in their face?Apple wasn't being "secretive."
Because all OS's do management between battery and CPU.
I haven’t got a clue the method I requested for payment. My guess is physical check. Hopefully those are shortly behind.
We live in a litigious age, and given things like iPhones are magic, not understood by either the user or the lawyers, and so here we are.This was always one of the stupidest lawsuits from a consumer perspective.
I responded to: "This was always one of the stupidest lawsuits from a consumer perspective."That's not how facts work.
Oh what the internet has done to people.
I don't remember how many claims I filed (my family goes through a lot of phones) but I received three separate deposits of $92.17 this morning.The Class participants will probably get $10 each, but the lawyers will get millions.
Confirmation@SmartphonePerformanceSettlement.comTrying to search my email inbox, who is the sender? I can't remember if I did it or not.
only in the US?
Thanks - realized I have a check coming along with the digital payment received.
Same and same. Hopefully it is fairly simple!Oh no, I selected the mailed check option and have since moved.
Emailed questions@smartphoneperformancesettlement.com to see if they can update the mailing address on my spouse's and I's claims.
The lawsuit wasn't filed because of the limitations of lithium-ion batteries. It was filed because Apple was secretly throttling the performance of iPhones. So yes, as an iPhone owner whose device was secretly throttled by Apple, I was screwed.You weren't screwed. The lithium-ion batteries in all smartphones have the same limitations.
You are 100% correct on this. And my own supposition is that the secrecy is evidence of consciousness of guilt. They wanted to sell more phones, and they knew that secretly throttling was wrong. The battery story was a convenient cover (who else with Li batteries does this?), which almost worked as you can see by the rubes toeing that line here.I don't know why you, and several other people, refuse to see the reasons for this. It's not what Apple did, it's that they didn't tell anyone they did it., and there was no way for the end-user to know what was happening.
If they were upfront and said "we're enabling this, and here is how you know if it affects you", there would have been no lawsuit, no case, and no payouts..
Transparency would have solved this.
Thank. You.The tech media STILL can't report on this issue correctly.
Throttling was not just for end-of-life batteries. It was also for new batteries that were operating below 20% charge or were operating in cold temperatures. All three of those scenarios could result in voltage demands that the battery couldn't supply which could potentially do permanent damage to the phone hardware.
This was always one of the stupidest lawsuits from a consumer perspective. Without throttling, the phone would simply shut off in either of those three scenarios. All the throttling did was allow the user to continue what they were doing albeit in a slower speed.
I honestly don't know, but couldn't Apple optimize their HW to run on batteries that are partially depleted from the beginning?No, the sad part is that Apple had to pay people for an issue that has 100% to do with the limitations of lithium ion battery technology and 0% to do with Apple.
I filed but didn't get any deposits yet. Didn't get any confirmation emails for my claims but luckily I saved the confirmation print page upon submitting the claims.I can’t remember if I filed a claim. Does anyone know if there was a confirmation email? What the approximate title was? Thanks
I figured it would probably be even less than that, so I ignored it and never filed a claim.Amount of Cash Payment: Under the proposed settlement, Apple will provide a cash payment of approximately $25 per eligible device.