Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple apparently proposed this (eSIM), but carriers said no.

arn

Too bad because *that* would be the way to go. No need to change the device (or card or drawer) design every year...


One of Nokia's objections to Apple's proposal is the use of a "drawer" to protect the nano-SIM card. The drawer design is seen on the iPhone 4S and iPad, allowing the user to eject the SIM from the side of the device.

And why are they "objecting"? Simply because their phones don't have the "drawer design" or because their way is simply better? I'd like to know because as a consumer, I'm all for the better (smaller or not) design.
 
You'd be very naive to think that Apple doesn't send checks to many scores of patent owners for every iPhone sold. Apple should receive checks from others when their ideas are used, just as Apple pays them.

The Android trolls just don't get it.
Apple wont license its patents under Jobs. They did not want money for their patents. They wanted the other companies to stop use them.

This is the reason why its just stupid to proclaim that Apple wants to invent its own SIM and then patent it and license it out. Apples history in industry wide patents is that Apple provide its patents royalty free like their patents in H264.

Fandroid lives in a dream world there they believe Apple taxes them. But they seems not to have any problem paying MSFT 5-15 dollar per Android device.

But Post-Jobs maybe Apple is starting to license out its patents. Apple love to make the same mistakes they did in 1985-->. Soon we will have clones. Maybe even my personal dream that Apple license OSX to PC companies. We would for the first time have a real alternative to MSFT in the PC world.
 
Wirelessly posted



Not down ranked cause of your critism but because your simply wrong.

Have you looked inside of an iPhone? Do you see how tightly packed everything is?

Even the a space of .0001 cms makes a huge difference to the designers and engineers. As technology progress's things are going to become smaller, what the point of making something sleeker and give it more funcinality if you have something as simple as a card size holding you back.

If anything this should have been done a long time ago, most of the sim card is a waste of space. The only part that is require is the golden part on the card. So why include the other useless plastic? For fun?

On the first page (before the comments thread), this was misquoted as though Crzyrio had made the comment about being downranked into oblivion. The quotes were put in the wrong place.
 
Why are companies deciding the standards and not regulations bodies?

Who do you think comprises the regulation bodies? Besides, most standards are voluntary standards anyway.

I've worked on a number of industry standardization committees for EDI formats. And while all the major companies participate and frequently lead the standardization committees, when it actually comes time to adopt and implement the standard, frequently the companies don't bother or defer, because the technical people designing the standard aren't the ones who make the financial decision to implement. And if the company doesn't see any financial return from the new standard, they frequently don't bother to implement.

----------

Soon we will have clones. Maybe even my personal dream that Apple license OSX to PC companies. We would for the first time have a real alternative to MSFT in the PC world.

Never, never going to happen. Besides, much of the benefit of the Apple OS is its tight integration to hardware, in spite of the fact that most of the hardware components in Apple's computers are now pretty standard.

Besides, what is a computer today? For the most part, it's the OS. The components are pretty much the same. So about the only thing a clone might get you is a lower price for hardware, but you'd have to pay a much higher price for the Apple OS, because if Apple did permit cloning again, they would charge hefty licensing fees for the OS, probably even more than Microsoft does. So what would be the point? The only potential rationale to do this would be if Apple gives up on producing the MacPro tower and the only way to get advanced hardware would be via a clone. But even in that case, it's NEVER going to happen. Apple is a hardware company and it's the OS that sells their hardware.
 
The sim card let you replace your phone without having to go through the phone company. I have an iPhone 3GS and Xperia Play and can switch between them any time I choose.

That too, almost forgot lol. I was thinking about the Verizon ipad being able to run on hspa+ from At&t.
 
Their not vital to making it fly, but their vital to getting on it :).

They're not vital to getting on. Paper tickets are going away sooner or later. Not really sure what the point of getting your ticket downstairs then going to the gate with it to give up back to them. What a waste of paper.
 
what's the big deal? Why wouldn't they want to use the smaller SIM? Smaller is better (Most of time ;))
 
First of all, a full sized SIM card is the one shown *left* in the image. A mini SIM card is the one broken out of it, and Apple made a micro SIM card by again braking something out.

Correct, except Apple didn't invent the Micro-SIM format. The specifications for MicroSIMs (3FF) were defined as early as 2003 [*]

Apple were just the first to popularise 3FF in a mainstream device.


[*] see http://www.smartcardstrends.com/det_atc.php?idu=287
 
Is there something wrong with that? Name a corporation that has actually said that they WANT competition.

Removing competition increases the chance of a monopoly. The only way you get deals or sales is with the existence of competition, because each company tries to outdo each other.

If one company were to monopolize an industry, any need for creative development, product improvement, or bargains for the consumer would be completely eliminated.

Without the presence of competition, there is no need for any of the above, because there's nothing else around that people can turn to.
 
Wirelessly posted



Not down ranked cause of your critism but because your simply wrong.

Have you looked inside of an iPhone? Do you see how tightly packed everything is?

Even the a space of .0001 cms makes a huge difference to the designers and engineers. As technology progress's things are going to become smaller, what the point of making something sleeker and give it more funcinality if you have something as simple as a card size holding you back.

If anything this should have been done a long time ago, most of the sim card is a waste of space. The only part that is require is the golden part on the card. So why include the other useless plastic? For fun?

Say this to Apple engineers who say that 5ºC or a couple milimeters thick don't matter that much.
 
The sim card let you replace your phone without having to go through the phone company. I have an iPhone 3GS and Xperia Play and can switch between them any time I choose.

I have multiple Verizon CDMA phones and switch between them all the time without having to swap a SIM or take off the case.

I just dial *228 from the phone I want to switch to, enter my phone number and PIN, and a minute later I'm on my way.

This is incredibly handy when my wife has lost her phone (for the umpteenth temporary time). I just pull out a spare handset, punch in the above with her cell number and off she goes.

Granted, that only works on my carrier. But imagine if there was a global number to dial where you pick your carrier.

Physical SIMs are old tech, can be lost, and require extra space in handsets. I'm all for an electronic internal simulation instead.
 
I still prefer a SIM card. If I want I can take my phone with me to the US and pop in a prepaid SIM and not deal with roaming fees. Which I found very expensive on my first trip to Florida. Assuming your phone is not locked ofcourse.
 
The biggest use for the SIM card is its to do with the Encryption on the GSM network as I understand it, so moving to eSIM or internal sim is a bit iffy, but changes to SIM's should be mandated by the GSM foundation and not forced through but a company with more money than sense.

Also Apple want a drawer as compared to EVERY other phone on the market, you can take the back off and remove the battery and oh look a sim slot.

Apple NEED the drawer as you can not do that with the iPhone

Kimbie
 
Apples history in industry wide patents is that Apple provide its patents royalty free like their patents in H264.

Like they did with FireWire back in the day, charging $1 per port, before the 'patent pool' was created. Don't know how much they have a say on Thunderbolt or if Intel is pulling the strings on that IP but it's not the cheapest to licence either. AirPlay isn't an industry-wide standard, but they're charging quite much for that too...
 
GSM may be old, but its no way getting ancient like CDMA. LTE is part of the GSM family, and HSPA is also part of the GSM family.

UMTS still requires SIM Cards, and so does LTE.


Technically, all 3G tech depends on CDMA. UMTS uses CDMA. HSPA uses CDMA.
But you wouldn't know that because you probably don't know what CDMA is literally, and how it differs from IS-95.

----------

Yes. Apple is very uncomfortable with the word choice. If they weren't you'd have been using microUSB a long time ago. You also wouldn't be forced to use itunes.

Huh? iTunes has nothing to do with it. Accessory interfaces has everything to do with it. If you had only microUSB, you wouldn't be able to make a video out adapter for the iPad. Remotes would be a pain in the ass. Even more than it is now. etc.

----------

B
Ironic how Jobs and co. tried to sell everyone on the idea of being against big brother in 1984... the actual year. Fast forward to today and they ARE big brother.

Not quite....

Google is Big Brother.
Apple is more like the Iron Curtain.
 
No, Verizon LTE phones from what I know still have the old CDMA system. The 4G SIM only includes the 4G profile.

http://support.verizonwireless.com/information/4gsim.html

Remember the Galaxy Nexus when the modified version was released in the US for CDMA, Google then dropped it as a developer device they had to ship encrypted files with the device itself.

Absolutely not, Verizon LTE SIM cards have and use CSIM authentication. All you have to do is swap SIMs to move LTE and CDMA between and Verizon 4G devices. You're confusing it with global roaming 3G phones (like the iPhone 4S). These use a GSM SIM/USIM provided by Vodafone (UK or Netherlands they vary) for global roaming only, and ESN/MEID based CDMA authentication. Which is stupid. There's NO reason not to just use the same dang USIM/CSIM card used for LTE for CDMA auth on an iPhone....
 
Really? I think Metro is pretty innovative for a phone OS (certainly more so than Android) and I love the integration between apps that it has--something iOS lacks IMO.

Funny, because I would almost argue the opposite. Apple's strong suit is marketing (its commercials are pretty good), while Microsoft's is not. Does Microsoft Office not count as a product?



I assume the next thing you're going to say is that you're a shareholder of Apple and you want Apple to monopolize the phone industry? ;)

But in response, yes there is, for the majority of us who don't own shares of Apple. Solely wanting no competition is not necessarily bad (I'm sure every company thinks that, as you said). Acting on it, however, like Apple is doing, is definitely bad for consumers.

Apple has great advertising, the distinction I was making is that Microsofts advertising tends to be aggressive (see their Kin ads) while Apple advertisements tend to be very experience oriented and positive.
 
Absolutely not, Verizon LTE SIM cards have and use CSIM authentication. All you have to do is swap SIMs to move LTE and CDMA between and Verizon 4G devices. You're confusing it with global roaming 3G phones (like the iPhone 4S). These use a GSM SIM/USIM provided by Vodafone (UK or Netherlands they vary) for global roaming only, and ESN/MEID based CDMA authentication. Which is stupid. There's NO reason not to just use the same dang USIM/CSIM card used for LTE for CDMA auth on an iPhone....

lol what?

LTE roaming doesn't exist, and also I have a "global" 4S, but last time I checked the 4 works on EXACTLY the same networks in the same countries, and I just have my normal SIM in the side.

Im from the UK, we don't have ****** CDMA networks.
 
lol what?

LTE roaming doesn't exist, and also I have a "global" 4S, but last time I checked the 4 works on EXACTLY the same networks in the same countries, and I just have my normal SIM in the side.

Im from the UK, we don't have ****** CDMA networks.

Well, no, you're wrong about the 4 and the 4S working on the exact same networks. The 4 is a GSM/UMTS phone that had a later CDMA model released. They're separate.

The iPhone 4S is GSM/UMTS/CDMA all on one radio. One phone model though the CDMA is, AFAIK, totally disabled in software for networks other than Verizon and Sprint. This is what Verizon and Sprint call a "global phone" (unlike Verizon's iPhone 4 which had CDMA only).

Verizon and Sprint CDMA global phones use a SIM card ONLY when roaming outside the United States. For Verizon, this is provided by their part-owner Vodafone. It is homed to either Vodafone UK or Vodafone NL and has a British or Dutch number that when online automatically tells Verizon's network in the US to forward incoming calls to it. It's a hack-job mess of global roaming. When at home in the US, the phone's MEID is used to authenticate it on the CDMA network.

With Verizon LTE phones, which use LTE for data and CDMA for voice (and data in non-LTE markets), Verizon uses a SIM card for ALL authentication. USIM application for LTE authentication, and CSIM application for CDMA authentication. This SIM card can be freely swapped between all Verizon LTE devices. I was telling the person that he was incorrect about the SIM not being used for CDMA *in Verizon LTE phones*

Now, my big question - why do the iPhone 4S (and other global roaming CDMA phones) not use the same SIM cards with USIM and CSIM? For that matter, why do they have no global roaming LTE phones (no Verizon LTE phones last I checked have GSM/UMTS)?

I don't know the technical reason (if any) for this, I only posted what I did to clarify that there's a HUGE difference between the SIM Verizon uses in CDMA global phones (a Vodafone SIM used only for international GSM/UMTS roaming) and the SIM Verizon uses in LTE phones (an actual Verizon SIM used for all authentication including CDMA vis CSIM).

1. Perhaps the reason is marketing (SIM swapping is a cool new LTE feature...).

2. Perhaps the reason is roaming agreements (i.e. Verizon may not want to negotiate a full set of International roaming agreements, instead preferring to rely as they do now on the global roaming agreements of their 45% parent Vodafone).

3. Perhaps there are unresolved technical switching considerations required in bringing roaming voice traffic from the GSM MAP core into Verizon's legacy ANSI-41 MAP. Here is a white paper from 3GPP2 (the people officially behind CDMA, basically a front for Qualcomm) on how this can be accomplished though: http://www.3gpp2.org/public_html/specs/N.S0028-0_v1.0.pdf

I'm inclined to believe it's a mix of 2 and 3. That not only would they have to negotiate roaming agreements all over the world (instead of using Vodafone's), they'd have to work with these carriers to help implement GSM/ANSI-41 interoperability. While obviously, due to their part ownership, it should be no problem getting Vodafone to do this, other international carriers - especially in smaller countries may be more reluctant.

These issues may need to be resolved, at least domestically anyway, before Verizon can start the migration to VoLTE, which will use Diameter, the replacement and official migration path from the GSM MAP. Where are the LTE global phones? Perhaps we won't see any until VoLTE is implemented and Verizon is using Diameter all around, including for voice traffic. What will happen when these subscribers leave the Verizon LTE coverage area? While Verizon will have the vast majority, if not all, of their native coverage overlaid with LTE before they deploy VoLTE on any wide scale. But what happens when these customers go to say, Alaska, where Verizon has no service? Today they roam on a local CDMA network. Will Verizon VoLTE phones support CDMA and have ANSI-41 interoperability working? Will Verizon VoLTE phones be GSM/UMTS/LTE devices and roam on arch-rival AT&T in those areas? What about global phones? If Verizon's main switching for VoLTE is Diameter and they use ANSI-41 interoperability to roam domestically in areas without Verizon LTE coverage, then foreign carriers would have no potential ANSI-41 compatibility issues. I could see VoLTE bringing a substantial loss of coverage to Verizon customers if they don't implement ANSI-41 interoperability with rural CDMA carriers and they don't allow GSM/UMTS roaming on arch-rival AT&T. Perhaps that's the point behind Verizon's LTE in Rural America program?

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out.

As for LTE roaming, sure it exists. Not deployed yet, but the capability is there. But at approx US$2-10/MB in data roaming charges (depending where you are in the world and who your home network is) and the insane number of bands LTE is getting shoehorned into, who wants it yet?

UPDATE - I corrected myself. LTE does not use the GSM MAP (aka SS7/MAP) as we know it. It uses a new protocol called Diameter which is the intended replacement for the GSM MAP.

UPDATE 2 - The necessary integration, whatever it may be, might be coming soon. Further research shows that both the Motorola Droid 4 and LG Spectrum have radio chipsets with support for GSM/UMTS; and early leaked inside information stated they'd be global roaming phones. While it's possible this means nothing (both the iPhone 4 and 4S have radio chipsets supporting UMTS-1700 for example...), there is a possibility (if other needed hardware is in place) that a future firmware upgrade could enable this ability and an unnamed "Verizon representative" apparently states it will. Take with a huge grain of salt: http://pocketnow.com/android/verizon-confirms-global-roaming-for-new-lte-smartphones
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.