Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How underwhelming this WWDC was is proof that working from home for too long, while might help some employees work better, it won’t work in a company like Apple, which aims to build something that’s “more than just the some of it’s parts”.

PS: When it comes to developer tools, this WWDC was great. But thats because it was all about polishing what was already built. Truly the vision and design ground work for what was done this year, was done years earlier.

I guarantee we would have seen some new hardware at WWDC if there wasn’t a chip shortage going on.

While this years WWDC was underwhelming, sometimes it’s best for companies to polish things.
 
Apple's just shifted from 5 days per week in the office (except for specific home-working contracts), to three days per week. That's a major shift from a company as large as Apple. Employees have a right to voice their concerns and opposition, but realistically the company can set the policies, and it can make exemptions where it feels it doesn't hurt the work there.

The letter they wrote to Tim said that without the flexibility to work from home, they might have to leave Apple. But none of them were hired to work from home originally. They all applied to and got jobs knowing they'd be working 5 days a week in the office.

"...employees said that without the flexibility of choosing between remote and in-person work, they feel they have to choose between "either a combination of our families, our well-being, and being empowered to do our best work, or being a part of Apple."

Yeah, they do. Lots of people across the world are coming to the realization that large corporations with in-person jobs is not where they want to work. They had already chosen Apple over their families when they accepted the jobs, because remote work was never part of their employment contract.

The decisions made back when they joined reflected the world at that time. But the world's changed in the past 1.5 years. Back then, remote work was something of a unicorn, the occasional person could negotiate it but most probably didn't bother to ask. Now it's being seen as a desirable benefit by some and some corporations are adopting it, possibly permanently. So as people are going back to the office, it's fair to think they'll be re-evaluating whether those terms are even relevant anymore or if this new environment means it's just not worth it anymore.
 
I think people here are being a bit too dramatic. If/when my office says they want people to come back to the office, I will definitely speak up. Doesn't mean I am entitled or a little baby. Its the new standard. And I am more than welcome to find a permanent work from home job, but I first want to discuss with my current employer as I like this job. There is NOTHING wrong with this. The way people here are posting is basically saying you can't say ONE WORD about ANYTHING work related. You should just be happy you have a pay check and keep your mouth shut for ANYTHING ELSE. That is just not right.
 
He’s a dinosaur over 50, guaranteed.
I am NOT 50 and I agree. if you own your own business, have employees that you pay, and insurance for them taxes, etc... I think the perception is different. It is my company, and my risk. please follow MY rules, or find somewhere else to work. if it is MY problem, I will have no employees and no business to operate and will be working alone. basically, he who pays makes the rules, as it should be, but if no one is willing to work for you, you better bet the rules will change. I love this country and our free market, works as it should.
 
Are people still stay-at-home due to the Pandemic? I know IT people work remote or at home, and have been for years, I understand that. But is COVID still keeping people from going back to the office still?

We were back to work in April. Last year April 2020. Took 2 weeks stay at home, then everyone back in the office. A year plus later, not one person got sick, no family members sick, no clients came in sick. And our entire office has been vaccinated since Dec / Jan.

Maybe we all dodged bullets not getting the virus? Probably. But at our place it was sort of frowned upon to stay home or strongly encouraged to be back in the office pretty much right away. And it felt normal last year, it really didn't feel like a pandemic for me, everyone came in office, worked full days 5 days a week 8am to 5pm at the office with everyone, real little mask wearing too, boss told clients not needing masks when coming in, the entire time last year, and zero issue, and actually business was booming very good, and shocking that not one person got COVID or anyone we dealt with.

I disagreed with most of that, think work-from-home would have been smart and much safer, but it just wasn't an option, I mean it kind of was, but no one did, and you were looked at as a toxic bad guy, or a wimp and scaredy-cat, and not a team player if you stayed home, so no one did. All of 2020, everyone was here in person at the office the whole time, and pretty much no masks. Was so strange, like a pandemic wasn't really happening.
 
Last edited:
Naw. this isn't directed at the "talented" people. They aren't talented because they collaborate in person or remotely. They are talented because they bring an element of excellence to what they do and they are allowed to do that regardless of how they choose to accomplish it. This is directed to the tens of thousands or easily replaceable mildly talented drones who overestimate their worth to the company. They will move on to another company, Apple will hire replacements, and in a year or so, neither will remember the other as anything more than a vague memory.
And this is what we don't want. The programmers that know the system well can be better suited for making bug fixes. The AppleCare customer support rep that knows what they are actually talking about is much better to be on the phone with than someone that has started their first day and doesn't know anything.
 
Very good, the employer decide what its best for its business, not the employee
Of course its good if you can land on middle ground where everyone can be satisfied enough
Lmao. They don't have to work there and employers don't always know what's best for their business.
 
Stay home too long and it’s really bad for mental health.

And physical health. Bad for the back and your butt.

Staying home too long with family and fights happen. So many couples broke during Covid because they spent too much time together. They have to smell their farts more often and fight about what to watch on TV and listen on iTunes.

Some lots of other people spent too much time on social media because they had not enough contact with people but they got their heads fked up by Dorsey and Zuckerberg’s disinformation and headfk platforms and then they got pushed into other places like Telegram and get fked even more.

If you can go back to work physically you should because the price you pay for being isolated in the long run is the same as committing suicide. You will become outcast, mentally ill, cropped in old age if you don’t move around and make real contact.

btw wear a mask, wash your hands and keep your surfaces clean you filthy animals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: edc415
First and foremost, employees who don't work when at home office, are usually not that productive in the office either... (unless the reason for unproductivity is induced externally, such as kids - but those people usually WANT to come to the office anyway). If there's an attitude issue they are not loyal employees and need to be fired either way. The problem is not remote working, it's simply that the wrong people have been hired. Period.
Secondly, everyone claiming that those lazy guys should now come back to office and start working are either bad employers or questionable empoyees. As an employer, if you can't trust your employee to get the job done it's your and only your fault to hire that person. Meanwhile an employee who was in home office claiming people should get back to office to actually work should have an appointment with HR. Clearly they either judge others from their own attitude or they know employees who mistook home office for vacation and didn't communicate it. Either way, there's an issue that needs to be discussed...

Generally, people believing that in the digital age people need to sit in a regular office (no special equipment, no customer contact,... only regular PC work) 5 days a week 8 hours a day didn't make it into the 21st century.

Especially, in the software industry there are a lot of introverted people who are probably a lot more productive working from home at the time which suits them best -which may very easily NOT be 9 to 5.
That is essentially different from many other industries and need to be taken into consideration. Especially since the "performance" (or lack thereof) can be rather easily measured on the various collaboration plattforms especially when it comes to coding. I don't see how having those kind of people work in a crowded office increase the productivity.

That said, ~2 office days/week can help a lot with coordination, however, beyond that IMHO the overhead on time spent commuting and so on takes over. E.g. just halve an our spent commuting per day (= 15min one way, which is extremely optimistic) adds up to 2,5 hours per week.
If that's done by car that extends to less traffic, less pollution,...
Instead those 1,5-2 hours gained can be used in a meaningful way.

Last but not least, allowing people to work remote doesn't mean they have to. So, for people who believe that working in office is better than from home, just do so... but don't force your own personal preference on others, it may not be the case for everyone.

That comes from someone who prefers a 50:50 mix...
Yes. To add to this, I think people give way too much importance to water cooler/coffee talk. I work for a large company, 99% of the time its "Hey Fred, how are the kids doing?" instead of "Hey Fred, I have an idea that could change the entire company LETS TALK!". If you are unable to have a nice chatting session remotely asking how someone's kids are, then that is on you. NOT remote work. I have gotten closer to co-workers working remotely than in the office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alwis
Are people still stay-at-home due to the Pandemic? I know IT people work remote or at home, and have been for years, I understand that. But is COVID still keeping people from going back to the office still?

We were back to work in April. Last year April 2020. Took 2 weeks stay at home, then everyone back in the office. A year plus later, not one person got sick, no family members sick, no clients came in sick. And our entire office has been vaccinated since Dec / Jan.

Maybe we all dodged bulelts not getting the virus? Probably. But at our place it was sort of frowned upon to stay home or strongly encouraged to be back in the office pretty much right away. And it felt normal last year, it really didn't feel like a pandemic for me, everyone came in, worked full days 5 days a week, the entire time last year, and zero issue, and actually business was booming very good.

At the other end of the spectrum, my office is in Times Square, a few blocks from the hotel that had some of the first cases in NYC back in March 2020. We've been remote since then, triggered by two cases a few days after those first one. Since then the entire building has been limited to a handful of people, about 300 out of several thousand. They even went so far as to deactivate everyone's security cards so we couldn't be nudged into coming in by managers.

There's been a handful of cases among those 300 but they recently opened to about 1000 more people a few weeks ago. Current requirements are mandatory testing multiple times a week and masking everywhere. If you're vaccinated you're allowed to skip the testing and masking at your desk. Everyone else is still home until at least fall.

And you know what? We've been booming too even with most people at home. Profits in my area are nearly 10x which is ridiculous.

Then there's my sister's company which is a big defense manufacturer. They went remote and never looked back. Last month they closed a corporate office and told everyone who used to work there that it's 100% remote now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tig Bitties
I think people here are being a bit too dramatic. If/when my office says they want people to come back to the office, I will definitely speak up. Doesn't mean I am entitled or a little baby. Its the new standard. And I am more than welcome to find a permanent work from home job, but I first want to discuss with my current employer as I like this job. There is NOTHING wrong with this. The way people here are posting is basically saying you can't say ONE WORD about ANYTHING work related. You should just be happy you have a pay check and keep your mouth shut for ANYTHING ELSE. That is just not right.

I don't think people are saying that. Apple said they want people in the office 3x per week. People did speak up (just like you said you would), and Apple listened to their employees requests and they are doing what they see is best for them as a company by going through with the 3x per week. Unless anyone here works for Apple HQ we don't really know what is going on there. Companies will do what is best for them. Some companies can do work from home fulltime and others are too small to do it full time. It's not the same for every employer.

At the end of the day, Apple is going to do whats best for them and the employees will do what is best for them. If that means leaving Apple for another company then that is their choice.
 
Stay home too long and it’s really bad for mental health.

And physical health. Bad for the back and your butt.

Staying home too long with family and fights happen. So many couples broke during Covid because they spent too much time together. They have to smell their farts more often and fight about what to watch on TV and listen on iTunes.

Some lots of other people spent too much time on social media because they had not enough contact with people but they got their heads fked up by Dorsey and Zuckerberg’s disinformation and headfk platforms and then they got pushed into other places like Telegram and get fked even more.

If you can go back to work physically you should because the price you pay for being isolated in the long run is the same as committing suicide. You will become outcast, mentally ill, cropped in old age if you don’t move around and make real contact.

btw wear a mask, wash your hands and keep your surfaces clean you filthy animals.
Um how is an office any different?

Work at the office:
Wake up, take a shower, sit at kitchen to get ready, get in car, sit for 45 minutes in traffic, get in the office building, sit in an office chair for 8 hours with some bathroom/15 minute breaks and a lunch break, get out of the office building, sit in a car for another 45 minutes, get home, sit and have dinner.

Work at home:
Wake up, take a shower, sit at kitchen for a bit, get in my home office, log in to work, sit and do work for 8 hours with some breaks, log out.

See whats missing there? Just basically sitting in a car. Which can do way more harm than you think. I get way too stressed when I drive and its not healthy either.

And I have actually been more healthy working from home. Going for a walk or a run during a lunch break is not a good idea as I really don't want to spend the rest of the afternoon all sweaty. But doing it from home I can take a shower after. Or better yet, I can actually go swimming during my lunch break.

Office basically 8 hours sitting in a cube
Home basically 8 hours sitting at your desk

Its really not different. Taking out the 1.5 hour car time and I am more productive. I am not sitting for an additional 1.5 hours every day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alwis
If your team is unable to be productive and found a need to meet in person, it sounds like there's a need to reexamine the work process and internal tooling. All the architects in the teams I've worked in the past few years been 100% remote.

To me, it also sounds like a solution in search of a problem.

If Apple can demonstrate that their product design workflow works, and assuming there isn’t another pandemic-level event that forces people to stay away from the office, I am not really seeing the impetus to transition to a 100% remote arrangement.

It’s like trying to get all my work done from an iPad. It’s great if I can, but it’s not really a priority for me, and I won’t force the issue.

To me, the opportunity to work from home remains “nice to have, but not essential”. Maybe Apple will eventually get there (this is probably more of a gradual process than something you can force overnight), but I am going to trust that from a macro perspective, Apple’s leadership knows best what is necessary (and non-negotiable).
 
I don't think people are saying that. Apple said they want people in the office 3x per week. People did speak up (just like you said you would), and Apple listened to their employees requests and they are doing what they see is best for them as a company by going through with the 3x per week. Unless anyone here works for Apple HQ we don't really know what is going on there. Companies will do what is best for them. Some companies can do work from home fulltime and others are too small to do it full time. It's not the same for every employer.

At the end of the day, Apple is going to do whats best for them and the employees will do what is best for them. If that means leaving Apple for another company then that is their choice.
Have you seen some of the posts here? "QUIT WHINING", "Go back to work babies". There have been a lot like this.
 
Imagine comparing banking, the stodgiest, old school, conservative, "Yes executives walk through a separate door", "we'll be the last ones in the pool" industry to the technology field. I'm flabbergasted as many support ApplePay as they do.
I work in New York tech, and I’m still wfh. But I’ve had early doctor’s appointments and walk in my neighborhood before work, and I definitely see plenty of people on their way to work. Subways seem to have rush hour again. I don’t know if everyone is back in the office full time, but it really looks like my firm is more the exception to the rule than the norm here in NYC. It’s not just banking here, so much of everything seems to be closer to normal than not, my firm is just being very conservative in terms of bringing us back to the office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tig Bitties
To me, the opportunity to work from home remains “nice to have, but not essential”. Maybe Apple will eventually get there (this is probably more of a gradual process than something you can force overnight), but I am going to trust that from a macro perspective, Apple’s leadership knows best what is necessary (and non-negotiable).
That’s about where it’s at for me. I wouldn’t mind a job that lets me be remote one week a month or so, but I’m not gonna fight for it.

I’m also a single millennial, one of not an insignificant number, and an extrovert. I’ve legitimately struggled with being 100% remote. Not only is it too easy to spend 15 minutes here or there on household or personal tasks instead of work, but social interaction, even small talk or office conversations, is something I’ve really missed. And fraternizing in the office builds teams and develops office cultures, it serves a point.

It’s been a bit easier in terms of socializing since my church has been meeting in person. The beginning of the pandemic was a particularly hard time for me as things shut down and opportunities to get out of the house and see my friends and meet new people started to vanish. Not everyone has kids or loved ones nearby to spend time with, not everyone can be happy sticking their head down and doing their own thing. There are perks to working remote, sure, but, on the whole, I wouldn’t mind being in the office again, at least part-time.
 
Um how is an office any different?

Work at the office:
Wake up, take a shower, sit at kitchen to get ready, get in car, sit for 45 minutes in traffic, get in the office building, sit in an office chair for 8 hours with some bathroom/15 minute breaks and a lunch break, get out of the office building, sit in a car for another 45 minutes, get home, sit and have dinner.
Meet an associate, senior manager, other employee at the water cooler and discuss a specific situation you would not have been able to do on zoom. The human interaction is what is left out of the equation above.
Work at home:
Wake up, take a shower, sit at kitchen for a bit, get in my home office, log in to work, sit and do work for 8 hours with some breaks, log out.
Don't meet another human being for 8 hours face to face, to go to lunch, to go out after work, to have an intensive conversation while whiteboarding ideas.
See whats missing there? Just basically sitting in a car. Which can do way more harm than you think. I get way too stressed when I drive and its not healthy either.
Yes I do and it's more than you describe.
And I have actually been more healthy working from home. Going for a walk or a run during a lunch break is not a good idea as I really don't want to spend the rest of the afternoon all sweaty. But doing it from home I can take a shower after. Or better yet, I can actually go swimming during my lunch break.
I used to walk or work out at the gym in the building during my lunch break.
Office basically 8 hours sitting in a cube
Home basically 8 hours sitting at your desk

Its really not different. Taking out the 1.5 hour car time and I am more productive. I am not sitting for an additional 1.5 hours every day.
It's a very different experience, more positive experience, working in the office. But hey....to each their own and if working from home is your jam then have at it. But personally I would love a hybrid approach with more flexibility than Apple is giving.
 
I know of people who left prime jobs in top tier companies to try and reenter the company as a consultant with a hefty lift on the salary. It didn't work out well for those people.
I guess it depends on the industry, let’s suppose I work for video game company A, but I go freelancer: Electronics Arts, Square Enix, Nintendo (more likely a contractor for Nintendo), random movie vfx studio A/B/C (many many dozens to go by that now need games-like expertise), etc are down to outsource.
They actually do that already since forever and they pay outsourcing considerably higher than their own employees (I don’t understand why this).

The original company A has a hole I left behind, many more holes by other “entitled” employees moving to more flexible companies, company A would be quite compelled to hire me back as a contractor and fill the dwindling posts instead of me helping the competition.

Now, granted not everybody can do it, me I won’t, I’ll go back to work (a bit grudgingly until the feeling goes away) if I have to. Maybe find a hybrid middle ground. But there are some top talent that wow, what a homerun it has been for them to say “nah, I won’t go back… you can outsource me though, if you can pay more than these other ones”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
but when you give too much power to your employee is not good for your business
Hardly the case in the U.S., where the overwhelming power is with the companies, supported by a servile judiciary system. The U.S. is possibly the only developed country without a right to vacation, and where corporations are considered "people." Don't even get me started with pensions. So yes, ways to go in terms of giving more power to employees. If the pandemic helps in this, it will be a welcome side effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tig Bitties
If you think everyone at Apple is working on these top-secret projects then your friends have definitely been lying to you.

There are 3000+ employees at the spaceship campus, I guarantee you that at least half of them (and likely a lot more) could do their jobs without ever setting a foot on the property.
Hahaha! You’re making my argument for me. Exactly. Even by your uneducated estimate, half of employees must return to work in person.
 
I hate to break it to you, but even government agencies are moving to a hybrid of remote and on site work. Not everyone has to do all of their respective work in a SCIF....

There’s a big variance among classified information. Some meaningless budget memo that has zero value can still be classified as “secret” or even “top secret” because the USG plays it safe and classifies any and everything they can remotely justify

For the “actual” high value information on which lives depend — the stuff most people think of when they think classified — that information is certainly not being permanently delegated to remote work platforms.

Hate to break to it to you.
 
I guess it depends on the industry, let’s suppose I work for video game company A, but I go freelancer: Electronics Arts, Square Enix, Nintendo (more likely a contractor for Nintendo), random movie vfx studio A/B/C (many many dozens to go by that now need games-like expertise), etc are down to outsource.
They actually do that already since forever and they pay outsourcing considerably higher than their own employees (I don’t understand why this).

The original company A has a hole I left behind, many more holes by other “entitled” employees moving to more flexible companies, company A would be quite compelled to hire me back as a contractor and fill the dwindling posts instead of me helping the competition.

Now, granted not everybody can do it, me I won’t, I’ll go back to work (a bit grudgingly until the feeling goes away) if I have to. Maybe find a hybrid middle ground. But there are some top talent that wow, what a homerun it has been for them to say “nah, I won’t go back… you can outsource me though, if you can pay more than these other ones”.
The point you make and I agree, is top, top talent can write their own ticket. But how many of us are in the strata of the best of the best?
 
How sad. They’ll probably bleed some employees who will be much happier elsewhere. Seems apple isn’t the dev haven that people thought they were. Also the amount of hailcorporate in here is astounding. Imagine being that in love with a megacorp, it’s truly sad
What's sad is the amount of entitlement shown in some of the posts. It is true that providing a compelling work environment, good benefits, flexibility keeps a certain percentage of people happy, which should go a ways toward doing a better job...but it still has to be done on terms the employer wants. It is also true that some people sacrifice to get the work/life balance to what they want.

There are options for everybody and one size does not fit all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kc9hzn
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.