As @TigerNike23 mentioned, this is a stainless steel model which originally was more expensive. Still this is not a watch that anyone should be buying now, regardless of a slightly different finish or not.Is there any chance this is a mistake? How could Apple do something so malicious and irresponsible?
So my point still stands.As @TigerNike23 mentioned, this is a stainless steel model which originally was more expensive. Still this is not a watch that anyone should be buying now, regardless of a slightly different finish or not.
And while that is great, you probably wouldn't go out a buy a new AW3 today, right?)
For a low, low, low price of $17 ($2 off MSRP)I wonder if we will witness a day when Apple will be selling Refurbished Apple Polishing Cloth.
Yeah, people are ignoring the fact that this was the high-end model that sold for $750 when new. Has cellular and sapphire front crystal. I still wouldn't pay anywhere near $369 for it though. But the sapphire and steel make it tougher than the current aluminum + glass models. So, I could see it if someone really needed the extra durability on a budget.This is stainless steel model which also has Cellular connectivity. Not really apples to apples comparison! The regular series 3 refurb 38mm, when in stock, costs $149 and at that price point, could be justified for instance as sleep tracking only watch etc. Such as stupid and pointless article to begin with!!!
Absolutely SPOT ON! This is just pure greedShame on Apple for selling a product that will receive no new OS versions ever again. This is a honey pot for the uneducated consumer and they know it.
Yes, I meant the price that is mentioned in the post...If my AW3 broke tomorrow, and Apple was selling them for $100? Absolutely I'd replace the 3 with another 3.
But at this price, you'd be insane to not upgrade to something newer.
Again, I wouldn’t advise anyone buy these either, but how exactly does it get poor battery life? A little less than a newer model, perhaps, but it’s going to get pretty much the same battery life it was rated for when the Series 3 was the flagship.The Series 3 no longer receives software updates and has an outdated design, health features, performance, and poor battery life.
Windows XP still works too, but you're a fool to connect it to anything. No updates means no security updates, not just features. When exploits are discovered they are published online, it will be public knowledge how to exploit your watch. Maybe you're clever and don't put anything on your watch, but the general public will use it for paying, holding medical information, authentication, and more.I understand why people would generally be better off not getting a Series 3, but just because it doesn’t get software updates, doesn’t make it useless. Not everyone has a strange fixation on constantly changing software and whatever the watch did when it was current, it will continue to do.
There's a precedent for Apple still releasing fixes for severe exploits like this.No updates means no security updates, not just features. When exploits are discovered they are published online, it will be public knowledge how to exploit your watch.
Of course, and people who use those sorts of features probably shouldn't use one if they're worried about it. But that doesn't mean there aren't other people who could still be well-served by it. Besides, outside of special circumstances, I'd be willing to bet that the actual threat posed by a lack of updates, especially on a watch, is far smaller than people make it out to be.Windows XP still works too, but you're a fool to connect it to anything. No updates means no security updates, not just features. When exploits are discovered they are published online, it will be public knowledge how to exploit your watch. Maybe you're clever and don't put anything on your watch, but the general public will use it for paying, holding medical information, authentication, and more.