I bought 40 shares on Friday just for fun. See how it goes.
I may buy some.
I may buy some.
Could Reed Paul Jobs (born 1991) take over (in a couple of years) from where his father was forced to stop ... does he have what it takes?!?![]()
Good time to buy?
Don't normally like Forbes and their anti-Apple click bait, but this article aptly sums up all the "advice" Apple is getting these days on what they need to do.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericjackson/2013/01/28/how-tim-cook-should-really-be-running-apple/
Don't normally like Forbes and their anti-Apple click bait, but this article aptly sums up all the "advice" Apple is getting these days on what they need to do.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericjackson/2013/01/28/how-tim-cook-should-really-be-running-apple/
The biggest enemy of Apple is not Google but itself. Most of its profits come from iPhone but they refuse to give people different sizing options and so people like me have pre-ordered the Galaxy S4 because it has a 5" screen compared to my puny iPhones 5's 4" screen.
Why can't Apple just do a 4",4.5", and 5" screens? Give people options, small screen phones are so 2007. Also, redesign iOS, its so boring now.
Completely agree. Who has not learned that "you can have any color as long as it's black" does not work? Especially if your competitors are offering choice.
One cannot control the market.
How come the iPhone 4 and 4S seem to still be selling well if the public wants larger screens? Surely there are cheaper Android phones (especially off contract) with larger screens. And we keep hearing how iOS is dated and doesn't have the customization and features that Android does. So wouldn't people be flocking in droves away from iPhone to these bigger screen phones with better OS? But who, besides Samsung (and their $12B ad budget) are seeing huge increases in phone sales or an uptick in profits?
How come the iPhone 4 and 4S seem to still be selling well if the public wants larger screens? Surely there are cheaper Android phones (especially off contract) with larger screens. And we keep hearing how iOS is dated and doesn't have the customization and features that Android does. So wouldn't people be flocking in droves away from iPhone to these bigger screen phones with better OS? But who, besides Samsung (and their $12B ad budget) are seeing huge increases in phone sales or an uptick in profits?
I didn't account for share buybacks. Assuming they use excess cash to buyback shares, Apple is definitely worth over $600 with my assumptions. So a good time to buy would be now if I'm right. I think they have to beat last year's 2Q earnings and announce buyback or dividends to jumpstart the stock. People are crazy thinking the stock is riskier than ever even though the price is a decent bargain!
Couldn't they also hold them for future employee options rather than destroy and later re-issue?
Don't normally like Forbes and their anti-Apple click bait, but this article aptly sums up all the "advice" Apple is getting these days on what they need to do.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericjackson/2013/01/28/how-tim-cook-should-really-be-running-apple/
Should be no trouble beating last years 2Q earnings. Verizon announced they sold 25% more iPhone's in 2Q over last year's 2Q. Sprint is much more on board this year than last year. The tablet market is much larger and the mini is out this year racking up sales. Tons more iOS devices are out there and they are logging onto the App Store and iTunes and buyings stuff. Only thing that will probably be down is the Mac sales.
So I think they beat last year's 2Q.
Agreed. Crazy prices like $700 a share because Apple released a phone that looks the same (iPhone 4S in 2011 - that's 1.5 years after the iPhone 4)? That's what I call irrational. And no one said it was boring (!). And then the iPhone 5 came out last year with slimmer design and bigger screen, then everyone says it's boring and lame and the stock falls back to $400. More like a correction then any change in fundamentals.The current stock price drop is a re-balancing of the irrational price rise the stock had a year ago. IMO.
People that are upgrading from old iphones ? People that cant afford the iphone 5 or other devices ?
Cheaper android phonesmost on the same range cost about the same and in some cases cost more a little bit more than the iphone.
I bought a 4S in January simply because it was $99 and not $199 for the lowest price 5. In February, I ended up buying a Nexus 4 for $349 and using it and the new 4S that I bought on T-mobile. My previous iPhone was another 4S that I had used on Verizon and sold it. I also didn't feel the 5 was a worthwhile upgrade so I used my AT&T upgrade in January to buy another 4S because I had sold my previous AT&T 4S about a year ago. My AT&T account was eligible since last May.
I do appreciate that the Nexus 4 has a much bigger screen then the 4S, I do still enjoy using the 4S as much as the Nexus 4.
Im using the same setup toonexus 4 with 4s.
The whole point of the column was to show how absurdly contradictory pundits/analysts/journalists can be when covering Apple. Sell a cheap 7" tablet to compete with the Kindle Fire, but make sure you keep high profit margins on the product.I took a quick look at the article and I find these three statements hilarious.
"Put out 8 different versions of the iPhone simultaneously, including ones with larger screens, like Samsung. But keep the margins above 44% and recall you only get the full profit benefit of a new iPhone in the 2nd half of its production run."
"Spend billions on marketing like Samsung. But let the product sell itself so that it stays premium."
"Dont pursue costly patent battles. But protect your core IP and dont let Samsung rip off your innovations."
So basically copy Samsung but don't let Samsung copy you. My guess is that Samsung will start copying Samsung![]()
The whole point of the column was to show how absurdly contradictory pundits/analysts/journalists can be when covering Apple. Sell a cheap 7" tablet to compete with the Kindle Fire, but make sure you keep high profit margins on the product.
"The market is crying uncle and something has got to give," says Oracle Investment's Laurence Isaac Balter, who has been banging the "Cook must go" drum for weeks.
"If a stock rally hits on this rumor before earnings it will be a sign for sure."
Now that's rich.
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/exte...ple-cook-whisper-campaign/?source=yahoo_quote
Surprise, surprise right before earnings, hedge fund guy Doug Kass (a favorite of CNBC) tweets that he thinks Cook is "cooked". This is the same guy who, before Apple's shareholder meeting, tweeted that Apple would be announcing a stock split. When the stock jumped after his tweet he sold his shares for a profit and then tweeted that the split rumor was baseless.
I love the end of PED's column:
And people still claim Apple stock isn't being manipulated.![]()
And people still claim Apple stock isn't being manipulated.![]()