Taiwan tarrifs charged to the US: 64%
Ours to Taiwan: 32%
Is that what you do to a "Friend"? We are not your buddies and we are not your personal charity piggy bank.
Sure, I knew someone would eventually bring up that ridiculous "64%" number. I just didn’t expect to see it this soon.
Honestly, I could’ve ignored you—after all, everyone knows that in your world, even islands inhabited only by penguins and seals (last visited by humans over a decade ago) are somehow stealing your jobs, your opportunities, your competitiveness, and yes—your precious trade balance. And that brings me to the point.
The "64% tariff" claim is simply a misunderstanding—or a deliberate misrepresentation. It’s not an actual tariff rate, but a rough trade deficit ratio. Taiwan's real average tariff on US goods is around 4.6%, while the US applies about 2.5% on Taiwan. Taiwan has made massive concessions over the years—on pork, beef, tech access, even TSMC. If anything, Taiwan’s been the loyal friend. So this “64%” number isn’t just wrong—it’s a distraction from the real problem: bad faith policy, not bad trade math.
But anyway, it doesn’t really matter. We’re now seriously exploring something far more grounded—a friendly dialogue with China. More and more, we’ve come to accept a reality: the China constant.
Personally, I don’t care how you or Trump plan to wreck the world, but you did get one thing right—America shouldn’t be our friend. Confucius once said: A friend must be honest, sincere, and wise. None of which can be found in Trump—or in you.
You and your kind enjoy the privileges of the dollar hegemony, ride the printing press while U.S. national debt hits historically absurd levels, yet live comfortably without a shred of urgency. Until one day, you wake up shocked to discover that even penguins are apparently stealing your jobs, your competitiveness, your assets.
That’s when it’s time to talk tough, time to put the madman back in the White House. You’ve done everything—except ask how you got here in the first place.
To be honest, I regret writing out this entire hallucination. There are many ways to interpret the world. But for people who always prefer the simplest explanations—the kind politicians love to sell—trying to reason with them is foolish. And here I am, being exactly that fool.
But I do wonder if Trump chose the number '64'% on purpose. It’s… not a random number, and it certainly doesn’t make things easier between us and China.
Sorry—there was an error in my previous edit. It's now been corrected.