Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is the demonstration that money cannot buy everything. When there is no memory chip available, there is none. At least for a time. There are things that are on limited supply, be careful with these.
That's now how contracts work. The contract on the supply run might be up for the current models. Time for the new ones.
 
Ironically, I am thinking about buying a basic 24 GB M5 Pro to experiment with local AI models...
You'd want more memory to run good, local models - at least if you want to run other applications as well, e.g. the ones using the AI. I'd get at least 48 GB to run the better versions of Gemma4, which is a good, efficient, and recent one.
 
You'd want more memory to run good, local models - at least if you want to run other applications as well, e.g. the ones using the AI. I'd get at least 48 GB to run the better versions of Gemma4, which is a good, efficient, and recent one.
What would you recommend? I am a researcher but not in a computing heavy area (economics). I do wanna use local models to help me with the job though. 48 GB?
 
What would you recommend? I am a researcher but not in a computing heavy area (economics). I do wanna use local models to help me with the job though. 48 GB?
At least 48 GB, but preferably 64 GB. Of course, more is better but Apple charged an arm and a leg for memory even before prices increased. It also depends on the configurations available, sometime one CPU configuration goes 24 - 48 - 96 GB while another goes 32 - 64 - 128
 
At least 48 GB, but preferably 64 GB. Of course, more is better but Apple charged an arm and a leg for memory even before prices increased. It also depends on the configurations available, sometime one CPU configuration goes 24 - 48 - 96 GB while another goes 32 - 64 - 128
The M4 Pro mini goes 24 48 64, 12 core cpu and 16 core gpu or 14 cpu 20 gpu. Suppose the M5 will be the same
 
All the other M series mac models like macbook's and the iMac (though there is only around a week delay in shipping for the higher end memory option) are not affected by shipping delays and that includes the new Macbook Pro/Air models with M5. Speculation on my part but i think Apple is slowly easing into the introduction for the M5 series models of the Mac Studio and Mac Mini. If it really was a memory problem more models would be affected than those two and yes there is a shortage and the prices are high. My guess is Apple won't wait until June to announce the M5 versions and is probably looking at May release which it has done before.
 
Mac mini with M5 and M5 Pro chips at some point in September or October this year.
This makes absolutely no sense as the M6 will likely be debuting around that same time. More likely is the Mini might skip the M5 entirely if it's not updated soon similar to how it skipped the M3.
 
Is AI an ‘overhyped’ fad as many people seem to think? No. It’s a major tech revolution that, for good or for bad, is going to change life on earth forever.
That's not an either/or question.

I already posted the example of the "dot com" bubble - which was a major stock market upset, but the underlying tech went on to change the world.

The bubble, over-hyping and unsustainable levels of investment has nothing directly to do with the technology itself going away. If the bubble bursts, either a few big players will remain standing or new, more realistic companies making more realistic claims will pick up the tech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HVDynamo and madmin
I wish they’d release a new M5 Mac Mini now. The sooner the better 🙏. I need a computer, want a Mac Mini, and have the money saved to get it plus the mouse and a copy of Office Home today (I already have a keyboard). I don’t want to wait until the fall. I really need a machine, but don’t wanto to get an M4 when an M5 is imminent.
 
This is the demonstration that money cannot buy everything. When there is no memory chip available, there is none. At least for a time. There are things that are on limited supply, be careful with these.
It has nothing to do with this.

Apple Silicon M3 chips used LPDDR5-6400 memory, while the M4 moved to LPDDR5X-7500. More recently, Apple has stockpiled LPDDR5X-9600, which is designed to be used with the upcoming M5 series.

Given this, it doesn’t make sense to invest in devices based on older memory standards—especially when they’re still sold at inflated prices. It’s far more reasonable to wait and focus on the M5 lineup, which will support the latest generation of RAM that Apple is heavily investing in for both M5 and future M6 chips.

The same logic applies to the MacBook Neo with the A18 Pro. It currently uses LPDDR5X-7500, but considering its strong demand and the depletion of A18 Pro supply, it’s unlikely Apple would resume production of A18 Pro—especially without sufficient availability of LPDDR5X-7500 memory.

As a result, the only logical direction is to move toward a next-generation “Neo 2” with A19 Pro, which would adopt LPDDR5X-9600, just like the M5—memory that, as mentioned, Apple already has in large supply.
 
Last edited:
At least 48 GB, but preferably 64 GB. Of course, more is better but Apple charged an arm and a leg for memory even before prices increased. It also depends on the configurations available, sometime one CPU configuration goes 24 - 48 - 96 GB while another goes 32 - 64 - 128

I went back and forth on this a year ago. I did a BTO studio m4 max, base cpu and 36gb ram, upgrading just the nvme to 1tb for the better speeds and storage. I watched so many videos about upgrading to 64gb ram and the higher core cpu/gpu, though in my use case for photography, it was merely seconds of time savings for an extra $700 cost. Now if I was doing ai or 8k video, it would matter then.

Now with today’s fake prices on so many products (ram and HDs) I keep wondering should I have just upgraded it last year anyway. Oh well, no going back now.
 
A company that makes 40 billion on rev each quarter cannot build their on ChipFab in USA? Yet Tesla/SpaceX can?
 
Macrumors has it wrong. PCs remain available. This has to be the M5 refresh.
Then this is a horrible way to handle it. You stop production for a supposed WWDC release in June? People who need a system now are going elsewhere. Apple continues to handle their pro markets horribly. Between how they botched the Mac Pro since 2013, and now this. At this point I am just going back to Windows.
 
We see variations on this "I wish this brainless bubble would hurry up and burst. Nobody is too big to FAIL" kind of comment with some frequency. I would love to have someone explain the thinking to me.

Because it seems to me that AI is a solid evolutionary tech concept still in its early years. No doubt some of the paths that AI growth may take will prove unsuccessful, "fail," but that is just the way growth works. IMO AI is not going to fail even if some current growth directions prove to have been bad choices financially for the folks wealthy enough to be investing in option A versus option B versus option C...
People also don't understand if the bubble bursts, the big push from several CEOs are that they want us to start renting cloud hardware and we will own nothing.
 
I decided it was the perfect time to sell my M4, Mac mini Pro and I got a pretty good price for it. Sold in less than one day. I just wasn't using it. I still have a MacBook Air and a MacBook Pro and I use those more than anything.

I did the same thing to make a lateral move to a MacBook Air.

For how I was using a mini, the technology allows for wonderful full-time docked experience while still Maintaining the flexibility of having a laptop on the go.
 
I hope we get back to normal by this time next year. I would like to buy a SSD at a normal price and I don’t want Sony to delay the release of the PS6.

Hopefully folks can take advantage if they are holding onto inventory. I had a couple new SSDs that I bought for 80 bucks as extras and I sold them for 250 each…. Both were going into PS5’s.
 
The bubble, over-hyping and unsustainable levels of investment has nothing directly to do with the technology itself going away. If the bubble bursts, either a few big players will remain standing or new, more realistic companies making more realistic claims will pick up the tech.

You actually seem to be agreeing with what I said in the part that you didn’t quote:

Are some early investors in AI going to fail? It certainly looks that way. But some will succeed, and as always, a few filthy rich billionaires will get even filthier from it.

Am I misunderstanding your argument?
 
You actually seem to be agreeing with what I said in the part that you didn’t quote:
...
Are some early investors in AI going to fail? It certainly looks that way. But some will succeed,
There's more to a "bubble" than some early investors failing. That happens with virtually every development and it's often the second mouse that gets the cheese. When something like the AI bubble happens it distorts the markets and disrupts other businesses. We're seeing this with the current RAM and SSD shortage/price rises which are already causing damage. It's really not going to help the AI industry if people can't afford the phones and computers needed to access their services! The gaming industry is being harmed by the lack/high price of GPUs and VRAM. Huge software development efforts are going in to AI features that customers are rejecting - some are starting to backpedal (https://www.xda-developers.com/microsofts-windows-11-copilot-purge-has-already-started/). Existing non-AI companies/products are being bought out for ridiculous prices because someone thinks they can be pivoted into subscription-based AI cash registers (see: Affinity Studio). AI products are being pushed out prematurely, failing and discrediting the tech (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq5ggew08eyo).

When the bubble bursts (e.g. the dotcom bubble) it doesn't just remove the also-rans from that specific market - it causes a wider stock market crash and "colateral damage" that costs everybody.

Am I misunderstanding your argument?
You are trying to dismiss the existence of the AI bubble and the chaos it is already causing as just another case of there always being winners and losers in business. There is a lot more to the current AI bubble than that.
 
As of now, you can still do 24 and 48 GB configs, which means it's the 32 GB RAM package shortage... since 2x32 gives 64

Yes I know they are fused to the M4, but no they don't come out of the TSMC oven looking like that... it's a multi step process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tenthousandthings
That's what I did. Let me tell you--the local AI models when you use 24 gb of RAM are terrible. They get most answers wrong. It will look like you are running ChatGPT or whatever locally, but its knowledge is trash. Wasn't worth it for me, and I'm told you need at least 100 gb to get an experience approaching the paid, cloud models.
Heya, is there a ‚solid‘ middle-ground for something like roleplay or fanfiction/story chatbots? I agree that 24GB are pretty low, but going 128GB is costly. Are there solid models that would harmonize well with 48 or 64GB? I own a 32GB M1 Max and consider upgrading to a M5 Pro or Max soon. Thanks!
 
Ironically, I am thinking about buying a basic 24 GB M5 Pro to experiment with local AI models...
I have the 24gb M4 and while you can load some decent models with 24gb you basically have no memory left to actually use them all that much.

Especially if you have anything else running at the same time.

So you’re basically stuck with asking a good model short/simple questions or a not so good model complex questions.

I would recommend you look at minimum 32GB if running local LLM’s is a real priority.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.