well
It's things like this that keep pushing me away from Apple.
They've squandered so much goodwill.
It's things like this that keep pushing me away from Apple.
They've squandered so much goodwill.
That's the thing with evidence. People shouldn't judge _before_ they have evidence, which everyone before your post very clearly did. Now we would want to know _why_ Apple asked them to stop (which Engadget didn't say), maybe someone will find out as well.
I am curious how blackmailing a company into not selling a product is remotly legal.
Apple asked them to stop (which Engadget didn't say), maybe someone will find out as well.
I am curious how blackmailing a company into not selling a product is remotly legal.
It is honestly so simple, apple wants to black mail a company, hamper competition, hurt the consumer, and then overcharge for an inferior product.
Did I miss a smiley indicating sarcasm, or do you actually mean this?
It may be less, but what if supplies are tight due to the MBA's success this past weekend and Apple is just being cautious, just offering another possibility here.
gnasher729 said:Apple are acting illegally here i reckon. You cant just bully your way through this just because someone offers a superior product at a more respectable price.
Photofast has only to simply remove the marketing as a MBA upgrade and market it as an external drive as it comes with a caddy does it not? Put that in your pipe Apple and smoke it. Its called competition and if Apple dont like it they can do one. In reality there is absolutely nothing they can do. How about your stop ripping us off for upgrades you greedy ****s?? Im all for the little guy here. Screw you SJ.
You have very strong opinions based on very, very little evidence. All that you have is a rumor that "sources close to the company said". Have you actually ever seen this product for sale? All that I know is that one month ago, it was not ready, and there was no pricing available, so this may just be a lame excuse for not being able to ship products. So I would suggest you wait with your judgement until the company itself says something officially (something that would make them liable if it is not the truth, not some rumors being spread out), and until Apple replies.
It would be like Coca Cola trying to shut down every other cola company in the world just because they make a similar product. And what is its a mixture of vegetable extracts available to everyone on the planet so unfortunately they cant! Apple cannot have the monopoly on this tech. It merely shows that Apple are ripping people off with standard components during the upgrade.
No, it would be like some company announcing that they will produce straws that make Coke taste a lot better, but they are not ready yet and don't know how much they are going to sell for, and a month later when no product is there, "sources close to the company" claim that Coca Cola ordered them to stop making those straws. And since Coca Cola can't do that, reasonable people would then ask themselves if maybe something else is going on that has nothing to do with Coca Cola.
Voice. Of. Reason.
Large supermarkets do this all the time.
Say you supply me with Wheat Flakes cereal, and you sell 80% of your stock through me. You're whole survival is based upon my massive orders with you.
Then I find out you are selling the popular Wheat Flakes to someone else.
I don't like that, as it means customers can get their tasty Wheat Flakes from someone else who may be undercutting me.
I can then go to you and give you two choices.
Either you do as I tell you, and stop selling Wheat Flakes to this other retailer, or I will cancel my order with you and you will go bust.
Your choice.
It's funny how people instantly jump down the "Apple's nothing but a greedy company"!
You do realize that Apple has an agreement with PhotoFast to make these for them. It very well could be in their contract that they are not to sell direct. Usually if you're an OEM vendor, you can't resell direct. That is normal OEM business. ALso, we don't know, but maybe Toshiba has a deal with Apple to be the exclusive 3rd party supplier??? We don't know.
The point being... think. Business is more complex behind the scenes than everything is a free for all. So I'm sure there are contracts behind this move and not just Apple being greedy.
Totally unsat, Apple.
They are obviously doing this because they don't want people swapping out Apple's inferior SSD's in their MBA's and replacing them with something that is either faster, cheaper, or has higher storage (or some combination of the three).
Apple would rather have its customers be content with paying more for inferior SSD speeds in their MBA's.
Hey, when is the last time you saw a Dell preinstalled with two competing OSes? MS wouldn't allow it. On the retail floor you never see dual boot pcs MS/Linux do you?Go write a letter to Steve Balmer about that and see what you get.
You must have tourettes.
I lov Apple's stuff and I'm in the city bus typing this comment on my iPhone 4. Yeah Apple does its nasty but as long as I am satisfied as a consumer I really don't care about other stuff.
Hey, when is the last time you saw a Dell preinstalled with two competing OSes? MS wouldn't allow it. On the retail floor you never see dual boot pcs MS/Linux do you?Go write a letter to Steve Balmer about that and see what you get.
If you feel Apple is "nothing but a greedy company" please, please stop buying Apple products. Personally, it would make me dirty to buy from a company I felt that negatively about if I had any other choice. I avoid buying Dell, Oracle, and MS as much as I can for this very reason.