They are thinking about e-waste… creating potentially new e-waste with unsold phones
that’s not a real thing.
They are thinking about e-waste… creating potentially new e-waste with unsold phones
So other brands of devices are still allowed to sell products without USB-C charging ports? Only Apple is banned? Just asking. This article doesn’t mention it so I guess they can continue.
But remember the EU tried to do this with Micro-USB. Would it have been good if they had succeeded then? Of course not.
Just because we all think USB-C is great now (and I contend that while I prefer it because I have other devices that use it, it’s actually worse than lightening) that doesn’t mean in 15 years we might have been able to have something better. But now we won’t because no one is going to invest significant resources into designing a better port without knowing if they’ll be able to convince the EU and its competitors to adopt it.
They are thinking about e-waste… creating potentially new e-waste with unsold phones
Which isn’t going to happen. When they were presented with the superior NACS plug for electric car charging the EU’s response was “we already decided on a standard years ago”. So the EU is stuck with a much worse connector. Same thing would happen in consumer electronics.The EU didn't set usb-c as the standard and then chisel it in stone like the 10 commandments. It's a regulation, and can be changed with a few days worth of work.
Disagree here. But doesn’t matter because no one is going to develop one thanks to the EU thinking it is qualified to design consumer electronics.A new port shouldn't be introduced, unless it's open, a standard, and non-proprietary, period.
Which isn’t going to happen. When they were presented with the superior NACS plug for electric car charging the EU’s response was “we already decided on a standard years ago”. So the EU is stuck with a much worse connector.
I would love Apple to have made a "Lightning 2" that is better than any alternatives and proactively try to get others to use it (no fees, etc)
This is more or less exactly what USB-C is, isn't it? Apple were the first company to put USB-C on laptops, and presumably played a significant part in its development at the USB Implementors Forum. John Gruber even has claimed that according to his sources, "USB-C is an Apple invention and that they gave it to the standard bodies".
Whether it's a superior connector or not is honestly irrelevant in the EV space
What REALLY matters is that they have a standard they decided on and fully leaned into and is what you find everywhere you try to charge
I say this as a 4 year EV owner
The old "don't let perfect be the enemy of good" is somewhat in effect here
The NACS connector outshines CCS in design, efficiency, and user experience. However, CCS remains the dominant standard in Europe due to regulatory and legacy reasons.
But my point for bringing up EV charging was more that I think anyone who says “the EU will just change the standard” is crazy. We have a recent example of them doing the opposite - sticking with a worse solution because it’s the standard.
Which isn’t going to happen. When they were presented with the superior NACS plug for electric car charging the EU’s response was “we already decided on a standard years ago”. So the EU is stuck with a much worse connector.
But, critically, CCS2 has the extra pins required to support 3-phase AC charging, which is essential in many European countries. NACS can't support 3-phase and simply isn't appropriate for Europe because of this!
It still makes very little sense: iPhone 14 was introduced two years ago. It is not a new device.The rule explicitly allows devices that are already "stocked for sale" to continue to be sold. You just can't manufacture or import new ones unless they are compliant.
At the risk of being very off topic it’s a comically worse connector. I have a lot of experience with both connectors and I promise it’s significantly worse. Cable is heavy and unwieldy, particularly when it’s cold out. They break much more easily than NACS connectors. It’s like the poster child of something designed by committee and if I didn’t know any better I’d suspect it was intentionally designed by car companies to make EVs less desirable than gas cars.No, CCS2 is not a worse connector than NACS. Yes, it's physically bigger and heavier than NACS, but not unreasonably so. The extra size does have some advantages if you want to achieve higher power levels in the future because it leaves more room for bigger conductors and active cooling, etc. And CCS2 is fully backwards compatible with all existing Type-2 AC charging infrastructure in Europe, something that can't be said for NACS vehicles in America: they need an adapter to charge on most existing AC chargers.
Seems really odd to make it apply to older devices... So what all of them now go into landfill? Anyone with older cables must throw them in landfill?
WEIRD.
It’s been well reported that Lightening licensing made Apple “a rounding error’s” worth of money. They were not holding off on switching because of money.Thank you, EU, for standing up to that greedy corporate scumbag Tim Cook! He wanted to keep Lightning around as long as possible in order to make even more money, particularly though licensing deals with third-party manufacturers via the MFi Program.
Strong disagree. Lightening is better at being a plug than USB-C, which is all 99% of iPhone users use the port on their phone for.USB-C is more user-friendly than Lightning, but Cook prioritizes profits over user-friendliness.
No innovation required, just conformance. How homogenous of you.The EU didn't set usb-c as the standard and then chisel it in stone like the 10 commandments. It's a regulation, and can be changed with a few days worth of work.
A new port shouldn't be introduced, unless it's open, a standard, and non-proprietary, period.
Strong disagree. Lightening is better at being a plug than USB-C, which is all 99% of iPhone users use the port on their phone for.
It’s been well reported that Lightening licensing made Apple “a rounding error’s” worth of money. They were not holding off on switching because of money.
Strong disagree. Lightening is better at being a plug than USB-C, which is all 99% of iPhone users use the port on their phone for.
Tech nerds need to remember that we’re the outliers.
Agree, but still not the government’s place to mandate it. Vote with your wallet.I Couldn't share the lightning cable with the multitude of other tech that is around using usb-c. My wife uses android, both my laptop is usb-c. iPhone using its own special cable is asinine.
Agree, but still not the government’s place to mandate it. Vote with your wallet.
Exactly. Heck, even Macs have had USB-C since 2015. But Tim Cook was too clueless to realize that iPhones should have the same connector standards as Macs.But I'll bet 99% of iPhone users have other devices in their life and they either all or mostly all use USB-C
It's a win for that general user to be able to plug "everything into anything"
("anything" more and more likely being a USB-C something)