They don't. The problem is, we're supposed live to in a society that is "innocent until proven guilty." In this case, it's guilty, until proven innocent. Ridiculous. Could he be guilty? Sure. But at least hear him out, don't just assume. The saddest fact is, in my mind, if it was an older man or lady, I'm sure their reactions may not have been to immediately assume guilt on his part.
I'd rather we live in a world that is too trusting, and be hurt by that, than live in one where we doubt everyone and everything.
Unfortunately you have your concepts mixed up - that is the presumption in court, sure, meaning that the police have the burden of proof to show that the guy is not innocent. However that presumption is not forced on, in this case, the apple store. To do so would have them become purposefully naive, trusting everyone and thinking the best. As far as I know, its not even a presumption the police have to follow in their investigations - they have to be mindful of what they can prove in court, where that is the presumption, but they can arrest whoever they want, with whatever prejudice or presumptions they care to make.
Last edited: