I can't get into Eriden's head, but I don't think he was intending to be rude. I read it more as a jokey way of saying that your perception of a kid's ability to just figure stuff out trumps the ability to read. At least that's how I read it.
I don't think he intended to be rude either. I think this whole thread is taking my comment way out of context. I think your post here actually put it back into context, so thanks.
Fair enough. But does anyone really know how to use anything unless they've been taught/shown the fundamentals?.
No, and that is why everyone starts off using computers that way. But once a person can read, we can start teaching ourselves. We can sit down at the computer and figure it all out on our own. That is where I believe a person starts to really know how to use a computer, for more than some memorized commands and icons. Our kids can only find Angry Birds because they were shown.
This was never about knowing how to use the iPad. Just knowing how to operate it. The bottom line, a young kid can operate an iPad without knowing how to read.
I'm the one who made the comment, so I can honestly say that I was talking about knowing how to use and understand the iPad, not just operate it. A kid can operate an iPad and find Angry Birds without really knowing what they're doing. Again, a kid can drive a car without a single driving lesson. That doesn't mean he knows what he's doing behind the wheel.
They'll have a much easier time using the iPad by themselves than using the iMacs.
Oh I totally agree there. iPads are far more kid friendly than Macs. That's why I started my daughter out on it, because she can operate it without being able to read. I just don't fool myself into thinking that she now knows how to operate a computer just because she can find Angry Birds or notice a new app.
People took my comment so far out of context. I said it because someone was arguing that computers in the classroom and in kid's lives would hurt their ability to read and write. What I'm saying is that it will do the opposite, it will make sure that they can read and write. I wasn't talking about finding Angry Birds, and yet now that has somehow become the litmus test for computer literacy. I'm talking about using iTunes, writing a term paper, using email, browsing the web, doing any sort of work, and doing all the things that adults (and young adults) use computers for. When your kid is 10, if she can't read she'll still be finding Angry Birds and no one will be impressed.
So basically, I'm talking about using a computer to actually do things, not throw birds and pigs. Computers won't replace the necesity for literacy. It will enhance it.