Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sorry, but this is BS. You don't need all those services at the same time. The beauty of streaming services is that you can cycle them, binge watch them, and then cancel. If you want to see everything at once, as soon as it comes out, well, that means you're willing to pay the price for it, so don't blame the provider.

Right now I have Netflix, Peacock, and Apple TV (*). Peacock will soon be canceled and replaced by HBO, which will be replaced in a couple of months by CBS.

(*) I got Apple One.
What adamjackson wrote is not all BS as $ + $ + $ … fragmentation is a reality if you try to follow the major soccer leagues and tournaments around the world. Movies are not the only streaming content.
 
It’s Not $5 a month
It’s $5+$5+$15+$65+$20+$10+$12

…and then you still miss out on the new Star Trek because you have to also pay for CBS so screw it, we’ll pirate it. That’s what people are doing. They’re paying $150 a month for 10 different services and they still can’t watch Picard (or insert whatever show is exclusive here)
What these people fail to realize is that pricing for products and services has to account for the inevitable theft. So the solution to steal or pirate is only making the problem worse.
 
What adamjackson wrote is not all BS as $ + $ + $ … fragmentation is a reality if you try to follow the major soccer leagues and tournaments around the world. Movies are not the only streaming content.
So you want everything, for cheap. Then get cable. This thread is about stolen content as movies and series, not about live sports which is a whole other beast.
 
Actually... Netflix is spending $17 billion.

But yes I agree.

:)


Nice! wow that's a lot of movies! I think Netflix said $2B last year on "Creation" of content or "Production" of content.

I did hear about $17B 2021 - but that is for procurement - buying existing shows and stuff - the actual making of shows from scratch sponsored by Netflix was $2B or so - I'm going from memory though. I could still be wrong though. Just a difference between production and acquisition.

Anyways - $17B is still a lot of movies yo - whether they are produced from scratch or acquired. I guess Netflix really wants to solidify their position in the market. It's a one trick company. Apple TV+ is just a small part of the Apple Empire.
 
I used to have satellite. Not only did I have to pay for higher packages to get channels I wanted (usually just one per package), but if I wanted to watch it in other rooms, I had to pay extra for boxes. If I didn't want to watch it live, I needed a DVR, which was another fee. Every year, I got a nice price increase to go along with it. My bill reached $120 at one point, but honestly, I could've dropped a couple of boxes and gotten it down to $110.

I now pay less than $50 a month (tops):

Apple TV+ ($4.99)
Disney+/Hulu+/ESPN+ ($19.99 per month, though $13.99 is subtracted via my Verizon subscription)
Paramount+/Showtime ($9.99 for both thanks to Apple deal)
Peacock ($4.99)
Up! Faith & Family (temporary subscription) ($4.99)
Discovery+ ($6.99 - temporary free 12-month subscription)
HBO Max (temporary subscription - $7.49 per month for six months)

That's a grand total of $38.45 permanent subscriptions.

I have Amazon Prime as well, but that's primarily for shipping and other reasons. I probably would only subscribe to their streaming service a few months out of a year if it wasn't for the other stuff, so I didn't include it in my pricing.

Netflix is too high for my tastes, but I will probably subscribe for the months of November/December/January, and then cancel it again.

I have WAY too many things to watch on the above services alone, not even counting Blu-ray and $2.00-$4.99 digital movie purchases, so I'm pretty content.
 
Nice! wow that's a lot of movies! I think Netflix said $2B last year on "Creation" of content or "Production" of content.

I did hear about $17B 2021 - but that is for procurement

Ah I see. I didn't know the breakdown of what the money was for.

It's still a TON of money.

I hear Netflix produced/procured 700 series a couple years ago. That's not 700 episodes... 700 entire series! :oops:

It's mindboggling!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BuddyTronic
What these people fail to realize is that pricing for products and services has to account for the inevitable theft. So the solution to steal or pirate is only making the problem worse.
Just like when Photoshop was $800 a seat or something like that. Adobe had to bake in the fact that 9/10 active copies were stolen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kierkegaarden
Piracy of music is WAY down. Why? The most popular music in the world is on every streaming service. I give Spotify $10 and I get it all.

There is no one stop shop for video and there needs to be for people to not pirate content. If the big three record labels each operated their own $10 a month music service, people would be pirating music still.
So true. Jobs started this all and saved the music industry by making a one stop shop for music. The model moved towards streaming and now all you need is one cheap monthly subscription . I used to pirate music and now I don’t. Because Spotify caters for all my needs. I’ve even deleted alll the ripped MP3s off my system to save space because I don’t need them any more.

Jobs tried to do the same with TV and Movies but the studios wouldn’t play. They got greedy and now we have the streaming wars. I subscribe to two services. That my limit. And with AppleTV+ it was a case of “if you can’t beat them join them”. This is why piracy is on the rise again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adamjackson
But most streaming services are auto renew, so if you don’t explicitly cancel then you are on the hook for another month. The old book and music clubs did the same thing-if you didn’t tell them that you DIDN’T want this month’s selection then you automatically got it. You may only screw up occasionally but take that times a couple of million accounts a month and you are talking a lot of money.
That’s why the steps are Pay, then immediately cancel. When you cancel, you’re only cancelling the autopay, they STILL give you access to the month you’ve paid for. There are a few app subscriptions that I use the same way… Pay/Cancel, use it the few times in the given month where I need it, then it lapses automatically.

For subscriptions that are NOT going through Apple, it’s a little trickier I’d guess, but still, taking the time to cancel immediately is a thing everyone should learn how to do.
 
Jobs tried to do the same with TV and Movies but the studios wouldn’t play. They got greedy and now we have the streaming wars.
or maybe everyone (scriptwriters, camera, stage hands, actors, ...) in a tv show wants to be paid a fair amount for their work in comparison to the exploitation of the music artist? Music streaming impoverished many artists overnight. Only the popular music artists earn well on streaming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unregistered 4U
Apple shouldn’t bother trying. I spend a decent amount on content because I can. But in my younger days things were different. Let’s just say I was very familiar with the one eyed sites. Durring that time I would occasionally run into something I couldn’t get because of aggressive takedowns. I never said ‘ok well I just have to pay for it then’ LOL. I just moved on to something else.

Seriously Apple just make more good content so you can continue to take my money and the people like me. Don’t worry about stopping the younger version of me. You can’t.

Give me an Apple One bundle without Arcade but with News. Or no Arcade but with Fitness. Lean into the people throwing money at you already.
 
Piracy of music is WAY down. Why? The most popular music in the world is on every streaming service. I give Spotify $10 and I get it all.

There is no one stop shop for video and there needs to be for people to not pirate content. If the big three record labels each operated their own $10 a month music service, people would be pirating music still.
All the big songs are on YouTube. Find a mp3 extractor and you are good to go.
 
I have Apple TV+ and will probably cancel it when the free term is up due to the fact there’s very little on it I find appealing. As I pay for multiple other streaming services like Netflix, Amazon and Disney+, I can see how it can get expensive. I’d probably be in the boat of downloading anything that gets popular from Apple rather than pay for a service that is mostly unappealing to be honest. I don’t mind paying if there is enough content, but up until now there hasn’t been.
 
All the big songs are on YouTube. Find a mp3 extractor and you are good to go.

Exactly.

Funny how no one seems to worry about Youtube letting anyone listen to nearly any song ever made.

Sometimes it's the artist or labels themselves who upload songs to Youtube.

Do the ads on Youtube pay more than buying the song for $1.29 or the royalties from a streaming service?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VictorWhiskey
The existence of Piracy is great for the consumer - it provides an alternative. It provides motivation for the industry to improve how it deliver's it's content, what they charge for it - and makes them realize that there are actual, measurable consequences for getting it wrong.

I tend to view piracy as a barometer for how well the industry is doing at delivering their content in a way their audience finds acceptable.

The more they complain about it - the more it demonstrates what a p*ss poor job they are doing.

Not condoning piracy blah blah blah, always be some people that do it regardless etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Currently have Apple and Netflix. Really quite happy with Apple’s shows. Considering that I don’t watch that much, it is even sufficient. I only occasionally find something interesting on Netflix, and mainly keep it for all the cartoons for the kids. I am interested in HBO but frankly I have enough to watch in my limited tv time. Not interested in Disney.
 
The existence of Piracy is great for the consumer - it provides an alternative. It provides motivation for the industry to improve how it deliver's it's content, what they charge for it - and makes them realize that there are actual, measurable consequences for getting it wrong.

I tend to view piracy as a barometer for how well the industry is doing at delivering their content in a way their audience finds acceptable.

The more they complain about it - the more it demonstrates what a p*ss poor job they are doing.

Not condoning piracy blah blah blah, always be some people that do it regardless etc
Haha, classic psychological justification bs.
 
TLDR, piracy is on the rise again because there’s too many damn streaming services all wanting their pound of flesh.

That's part of it, but I think Steve Jobs also got it right: you're competing with the user experience of privacy, too.

I do pay for Apple TV+, but the TV app isn't great. It's OK on iPadOS, and kinda bad on macOS (for example, who thought 80 pixels is wide enough for a volume slider?). If I were to pirate For All Mankind or whatever, I could instead watch it in IINA or VLC or some other player, which are more customizable to my liking. With the TV app, it's take it or leave it. Other streaming services tend to be not much better.

If you had told me twenty years ago that Apple was launching a TV streaming service, I would have expected it to be OK at content and outstanding at user experience; instead, it's excellent at content, but middle-of-the-road at user experience.
 
Piracy is a lucrative business for torrent sites, with a report from August estimating that the top five piracy websites raise around $18.3 million in ad revenue and sponsorships per year

Piracy is a crime and therefore I cannot understand why the law and the courts do not go after the ad companies because surely if piracy is a crime, the ad companies are making money off these piracy sites and thus it comes under 'proceeds of crime', thus why aren't the ad companies being shut down? Cut of the revenue stream and the majority of the piracy sites will close down.
 
You can watch all the shows you want for less than $20/month.

Wha?

I don't even watch that many shows, but my taste includes Trek (so I already need both Netflix and Prime Video here) and Marvel (so that's Disney+). Then I like some of Apple's shows (so TV+). Oops, already above $20.

Oh, and that's not even counting shows I can't watch at all because everything is stupid.
 
Sorry, but this is BS. You don't need all those services at the same time. The beauty of streaming services is that you can cycle them, binge watch them, and then cancel. If you want to see everything at once, as soon as it comes out, well, that means you're willing to pay the price for it, so don't blame the provider.

Right now I have Netflix, Peacock, and Apple TV (*). Peacock will soon be canceled and replaced by HBO, which will be replaced in a couple of months by CBS.

(*) I got Apple One.
Yes, that's the dance one must perform. There should be an app that does the dancing .?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.