Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,494
39,329


Apple is working on a new "Apple Studio Display" with a 7K resolution, according to 9to5Mac's Filipe Espósito, who cites sources familiar with the matter. The display is also expected to feature a dedicated Apple silicon chip.

Pro-Display-XDR-Yella.jpg

The report claims it is unclear whether the display will be a replacement for the Pro Display XDR or a new addition to Apple's standalone display lineup. Additional details are still unknown, including the size of the display and a release timeframe.

Bloomberg's Mark Gurman was first to report that Apple was working on at least one new external display, but he said that display would have a lower price with reduced brightness and contrast ratio. By the sounds of it, the new 7K model would be slotted above the Pro Display XDR in the lineup, so it is possible that Apple plans to offer displays at several price points as it did with its Cinema Display lineup in the 2000s.

Apple released the Pro Display XDR in December 2019 for $4,999, with an optional $999 stand. The 32-inch display features a 6K resolution with peak brightness of 1,600 nits for HDR content, 10-bit depth for 1.073 billion colors, and a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio.

Article Link: 'Apple Studio Display' With 7K Resolution Reportedly in Development
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnmarki
Folks who have no need for it already crying about the 6k display. This'll make them weep even more and get on their soap box about how despite having no need for one they should be able to afford one. "The Bugatti should be the same price as the Civic!"
 
I wonder if this will mean the power of 7K but with zero performance hit to driving the pixels with a dedicated chip inside.

This is actual innovation, Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACD30"
7k? Why? 8k would make so much more sense…
And clearly a niche product at a super high price…
Need something affordable…
Yeah it doesn't make much sense. The 5k display made sense because it gives you some extra pixels to work with for 4k content.

But I think we're a long way off from 8k content anyway. I mean they didn't even broadcast the Super Bowl in 4k
 
Folks who have no need for it already crying about the 6k display. This'll make them weep even more and get on their soap box about how despite having no need for one they should be able to afford one. "The Bugatti should be the same price as the Civic!"
Actually, wise one, people aren't complaining that the 6K monitor should be priced low. People are merely saying that they want an Apple monitor that normal people can afford. But thanks for posting your wisdom.
 
Well as you can buy 8K TVs now this isn’t that impressive, but it is impressive for its size if it’s say 40 to 50”, still it’ll be way too expensive for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: throAU
Please also make displays for people who are not absurdly rich, Apple. Remember you used to do that?
Or, to my way of thinking, just make me a regular monitor like in the 5k iMac. I don't need Apple to blow my mind. I just want a nice (not astounding) monitor with Apple's design language to go with my MBP. Apple has got the same disease Pixar has: once upon a time, Pixar made movies to entertain; now they make movies to impress critics and win awards. And they're not fun any more.
 
Actually, wise one, people aren't complaining that the 6K monitor should be priced low. People are merely saying that they want an Apple monitor that normal people can afford. But thanks for posting your wisdom.
Do people want an “Apple” monitor that normal people can afford? By that, I mean there’s a lot of vendors making monitors… the vast majority cheaper than Apple’s monitor. Are none of those suitable primarily because there’s no Apple logo on them?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.