Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Originally posted by Abstract
So I guess "it turns out that (I'm) just" right. I also saw old commercials, but they were for products that aren't worth $2.1 million dollars to advertise. The majority of the commercials that I saw were new to me, but not all of them. I'm not surprised that you saw some older commercials, since I'm sure everybody else did as well.

You have a very odd definition of "right."

Also, can someone tell me how monster.com is making enough money to advertise like that?
 
All I meant was that companies like Canadian Tire don't put out new commercials for the Superbowl, but all the large, multi-national companies do. Apple, in my opinion, is a large multi-national corporation. They should make new commercials because they're playing big by playing commercials during the Superbowl. Companies like Canadian Tire only paid $80 000 to advertise within Canada (or maybe it was just within Ontario, I forget). Anyway, companies like Apple need to make new commercials to keep up with everybody else. Yes, I said "need" to. It would look ridiculous for almost everyone to show new commercials, while Apple showed an old "Switch Ad" or something, don't you think? I only mentioned that "some" of the commercials were old because I thought it was safe to assume that we weren't talking about regional advertising. Sorry I sounded like I contradicted myself before. 😉

(Sorry for being off-topic)
 
I've never seen a 12"/17" commercial on tv and I look for them... I'm not sure anyone would even notice. Second, not to banter the motto too much.. but aren't we supposed to be thinking *not* like everyone else? 😀
Just my 1/50.
 
We'll I support Apple's choice. Personally I'd prefer to watch Alias over the Superbowl anyday. I've got no interest in what you Americans call "football" 😉

Alias is one of the best shows to come out of the States in a long time (maybe since Buffy).
 
Re: This is good

Originally posted by inkswamp
I'm very happy to hear that this rumor was false. The Superbowl is a whore-like spectacle and so over-the-top commercialized that the whole thing is a joke. It's more about the product placements than the stupid game, anyway. I'm perfectly happy to see Apple stay away from that. Blech...

LOL
 

Attachments

  • butter_worth.jpg
    butter_worth.jpg
    47.6 KB · Views: 695
Re: This is good

Originally posted by inkswamp
I'm very happy to hear that this rumor was false. The Superbowl is a whore-like spectacle and so over-the-top commercialized that the whole thing is a joke. It's more about the product placements than the stupid game, anyway. I'm perfectly happy to see Apple stay away from that. Blech...
I think it was great, halftime show,some of those commercials were a hoot . I loved the bud one with the horses standing around waiting on the zebra to make the call! then again the fact that i grew up in the tampa bay area might have had something to do with this------- do you think😀
 
Re: This is good

Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
I think it was great, halftime show,some of those commercials were a hoot . I loved the bud one with the horses standing around waiting on the zebra to make the call! then again the fact that i grew up in the tampa bay area might have had something to do with this------- do you think😀

I hope so. I won't hold it against you. ;^)

It just amazes me how much the Superbowl has become about everything except the actual game. I'm not much of a sports fan so I can tell you from the perspective of someone who doesn't watch the Superbowl that the news reported about the game focuses almost entirely on what big celebrities showed up in the ads, during halftime, at the opening, blah, blah... I literally meant it when I said that I think it's smart of Apple to not be seen as part of it. They are cultivating a somewhat sophisticated image lately, and the Superbowl is anything but.
 
Originally posted by Abstract
All I meant was that companies like Canadian Tire don't put out new commercials for the Superbowl, but all the large, multi-national companies do.

Hmm. Like Cadillac, which re-aired a previously run commercial ... I'm sure I'd be able to come up with many other examples of multi b/million dollar companies which aired repeat commercials at the Superbowl this year and last, if only I'd cared enough about the game to watch more than a few minutes at a time 🙂.

Superbowl commercials are an extravagance, and priced IMHO far beyond their worth. Yes, you reach a lot of people, but dollar-for-dollar targetted smaller-scale advertising is most often more productive.

As for how Monster.com could afford a SB commercial: venture funders who didn't get the .com message yet, I'd guess ...
 
shameless...

A little off topic, but did anyone notice when John Madden shamelessy name dropped for monster.com?
 
Originally posted by Abstract


No, you make money by showing something fresh and original, which means showing a funny and original commercial for the very first time. You cannot show a previously viewed commercial on the Superbowl. The Superbowl is the big leagues for advertisers. Everybody knows this, and so I really hope Apple doesn't show the same Mini-me/Yao Ming airplane commercial that they debuted during MWSF. That would be very lame.

Well I guess Visa diagrees as they showed the Barber brother commercial again, although they added 'one is in the superbowl and the other isn't'. Also, before and after halftime there were quite a few that were old repeats. It's only durin the halftime show that commercials are 100% new.
 
Re: shameless...

Originally posted by tpjunkie
A little off topic, but did anyone notice when John Madden shamelessy name dropped for monster.com?
Right, but didn't Al call him on it? John did a lot of promoting/advertising.

I love it when he says. When things change, it changes the game. That was my favorite line. JM is great at stating the obvious.

Way to go Bucs!
Good for Jerry Rice, getting a touchdown.

----
I didnt' think the commericals were that great, but I did like the one Bud put on with the mother. That was funny.
 
The ad was on AFTER the super bowl, during Alias.

I was watching for the Apple ad during the super bowl, but instead I saw it afterward while snuggling with my girlfriend. 🙂 We were watching Alias (her favorite show.) I'm glad Apple didn't advertise during the SB. It's WAY too expensive, while I'd bet the post SB slots give Apple more bang for the buck. Just a thought. I'm no ad expert.
 
Guess What???

At 10:11, on MTV, the Mini-Me/PowerBook ad debuted, so I guess this is what Apple was waiting for🙂 🙁 😀 😱 😉
 
Angry Green Man!

Well I was not watching the Superbowl but I did see the new teaser for The Hulk (available at the QuickTime site). I was never a fan of the comic but the movie sure looks like a winner. Forget DareDevil (Ben Affleck was miscast in that and so is everyone else in it) or X-Men 2 (no Cyclops? What's the point?), The Hulk will be the super-hero movie to remember in 2003.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.