This sure makes it seem like you're a fan of Apple!That’s because that’s all you choose to see.... you should look at other posts beyond front page news articles, but you can judge a book by its cover if you so wish to. I’m not fussed either way what you think.
[doublepost=1564766069][/doublepost]
So because I found it hilariously hypocritical of all the hard core fans on here, burying Amazon and Google under a barrage of hate comments and how they are evil and record what you say and listen to it, and then Apples found to be WORST because they have been doing EXACTLY the same, yet not allowing you to opt out, I’m not an Apple fan. What a narrow opinion you have.
Sorry if it upsets you that some people don’t blindly follow Apple, this is a forum beyond the front page news articles...
[doublepost=1564766146][/doublepost]
And so does it tell you that your recordings will be listened to to enhance the service when you set Siri up? Or is it buried in a 2 thousand word licensing agreement? Because Amazon tell you and ask if you want to opt out....
I totally agree and they have not been transparent and upfront on this.I don't think they can improve Siri without tons of recording. Machine learning/AI needs a lot of samples. If only Apple was upfront about how they are using recordings from Sir and providing opt-out option then this would not be an issue.
The real issue here is, for a company that BOAST a lot (to a point that they have lots of print ads about it in streets) about privacy they BETRAYED the trust of its users by not informing them how they are using the user data exactly. Security and privacy always starts with TRUST and it shows Apple can't be trusted.
Google *is* opt-in.
"When setting up a Google account, the option for voice and audio activity is set to off by default. Users have to opt in to store recordings on the account"
You mean similar to the Samsung galaxy sending your photos randomly to contacts vs a difficult to execute vulnerability. Sure a bug report is right on the topic of privacy.Tim "Doctor Spin" Cook needs to do a better job since the privacy spiel is slipping as of late.
https://arstechnica.com/information...ord-sharing-features-can-leak-iphone-numbers/
Lesson learned is sensitive customer data should only be handled by internal employees that are held accountable to a higher standard instead of being farmed out to the lowest bidder outside contractor.
You assume that the people who criticised Amazon then and those that defend Apple now are the same people. They could very well come from two different groups.
Well, when it comes to the couples having sex part....maybe there is just a surge in the popularity of the name Siri, and it gets yelled out loud alot....
Stuff like this should be Opt In not Opt Out.
You might say something that identifies you. I don't know how they can anonymize this.
Create an opt-in program for people who don't mind being recorded and studied, and in exchange give them iTunes discounts or free iCloud.
In exchange don't they get a Siri that should work better
I moved no goalposts; maybe you don’t understand what that phrase means?Where does it say that in the privacy policy?
But keep moving the goalposts....
But you didn't recognise my name, I guess.Nope, recognise the names. Plus Apple are the main hypocrites here..
That was 2000 words? Seems like it’s right in your face. And as you say about the “fans”, the “critics blindly criticize”. Whoever both of these general fictional group of people are.And where exactly is the opt out option? When you set you Alexa it actually tells you during the setup about its privacy and what you can opt out off... it doesn’t bury it in a 2 thousand word license agreement...
Also all your doing is highlighting the hypocrisy of Apple fans who complain and attempt to prove Google and Amazon are utterly evil companies who spy on your whilst defending Apple and its joke privacy policies and ad campaign.
[doublepost=1564733025][/doublepost]
Haha the best gif I’ve seen!
That's essentially the direction they are moving to by giving people a choice (how that choice is presented is something we don't know yet). But if with volunteers meant something like Apple employees or public beta testers (ie, people that actively seek to be guinea pigs), that probably wouldn't have been a diverse enough sample.Why not just have volunteers. And not force review on everyone? #OptIn
There is really only one meaningful change they can make and they have announced that they are going to make it and that is giving people a choice. Everything else is just fine-tuning things. What exactly did they made you believe until now that got disproved by this Guardian article?They don’t have to install anything in your apartment. They can just turn on the microphone on any of your “smart” devices. You read this article and feel calm Apple is fixing it right? It’s ludicrous to believe them at this point.
This cannot be said enough.....if this were any other company but Apple they would be villainized here....Changed that to reflect the sentiment of the ADL. Any other company reported on here doing this would have righteous, vitriolic hate thrown its way by the paragraph load.
This is a FUD statement. It’s a good question, but one that can be asked everywhere, from the government to the smallest mom and pop store that has our credit card information.....Who knows what else Apple is doing with our data for all these years.
remember this....Guess that's was a lie huh? When Apple poked fun at others when they had privacy issues come to light.This is a FUD statement. It’s a good question, but one that can be asked everywhere, from the government to the smallest mom and pop store that has our credit card information.
As far as Apple goes, I believe they are acting within their privacy policies, although consumer protection is a process and not something that one can flip a switch and just turn on.
But those other entities don't also have a slogan what happens or your (insert Apple Device), stays on it. We just assume it and hope for the best.This is a FUD statement. It’s a good question, but one that can be asked everywhere, from the government to the smallest mom and pop store that has our credit card information.
As far as Apple goes, I believe they are acting within their privacy policies, although consumer protection is a process and not something that one can flip a switch and just turn on.