Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That’s because that’s all you choose to see.... you should look at other posts beyond front page news articles, but you can judge a book by its cover if you so wish to. I’m not fussed either way what you think.
[doublepost=1564766069][/doublepost]

So because I found it hilariously hypocritical of all the hard core fans on here, burying Amazon and Google under a barrage of hate comments and how they are evil and record what you say and listen to it, and then Apples found to be WORST because they have been doing EXACTLY the same, yet not allowing you to opt out, I’m not an Apple fan. What a narrow opinion you have.
Sorry if it upsets you that some people don’t blindly follow Apple, this is a forum beyond the front page news articles...
[doublepost=1564766146][/doublepost]

And so does it tell you that your recordings will be listened to to enhance the service when you set Siri up? Or is it buried in a 2 thousand word licensing agreement? Because Amazon tell you and ask if you want to opt out....
This sure makes it seem like you're a fan of Apple!
"Hahahahahahaha oh dear.... so that newspaper report was true then, and yet again Apple has been caught with its trousers down..."
Looks more to me like someone that is excited that Apple is receiving negative press.

I also followed up my statement with this... "Differing views are cool, but you just seem overly giddy about this..."
 
This to me is a non-story. I personally couldn’t care less what Apple do with my Siri data. Now before the pitch forks are released, I’m not saying anyone who doesn’t agree is wrong, just giving my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
I don't think they can improve Siri without tons of recording. Machine learning/AI needs a lot of samples. If only Apple was upfront about how they are using recordings from Sir and providing opt-out option then this would not be an issue.

The real issue here is, for a company that BOAST a lot (to a point that they have lots of print ads about it in streets) about privacy they BETRAYED the trust of its users by not informing them how they are using the user data exactly. Security and privacy always starts with TRUST and it shows Apple can't be trusted.
I totally agree and they have not been transparent and upfront on this.
 
Google *is* opt-in.


"When setting up a Google account, the option for voice and audio activity is set to off by default. Users have to opt in to store recordings on the account"

I didn't read the agreement for Google (because I'm trying to avoid Google) but giving them audio access may not be the same as giving them permission to send your voice off somewhere.

I just don't get the "Big Brother is watching" aspect of this debate. Just as people tend not to read user agreements, they usually don't read the technical descriptions of the tech either. Heck, lots of people don't lock their phones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Tim "Doctor Spin" Cook needs to do a better job since the privacy spiel is slipping as of late.

https://arstechnica.com/information...ord-sharing-features-can-leak-iphone-numbers/

Lesson learned is sensitive customer data should only be handled by internal employees that are held accountable to a higher standard instead of being farmed out to the lowest bidder outside contractor.
You mean similar to the Samsung galaxy sending your photos randomly to contacts vs a difficult to execute vulnerability. Sure a bug report is right on the topic of privacy.
 
They should do it how it has been done for years, you want to carry an experiment? Pay for the research.

Create an opt-in program for people who don't mind being recorded and studied, and in exchange give them iTunes discounts or free iCloud.
 
So Amazon does it, and they all do it...

An "opt out" is not on the cards... They just "shouldn't do it" I don't mind them doing this while on hold ..

But not when a mic can be heard by anyone walking in the room, after the trigger word

In exchange don't they get a Siri that should work better

You don't need to listen to people's interaction with a 'home appliance just to improve on quality.
Who knows what they do with it after .. But this is the choice people made for convenience...

Ideally, for improving a service, that's what anyone can tell you.. doesn't mean anything really, but just gives better view of importance/clouding privacy more.
 
Last edited:
Makes you think does it not, or at least it SHOULD make you think.

Apple has chosen to place itself as the king of customer privacy and security, and all your data is safe, and stays on your device.

Yet, in secret, as they deliberately chose not to tell anyone, they were doing this.

They get found out, and then after we all find out about it. They now stop.

So, consider, if this is the way they work, what other things are they doing with customer data that none of us know about, that they will also stop in the future once it's found out?

I don't have any issue with what was happening to improve the product, the issue I have is promoting yourself as one thing and secretly doing another.

Like a Police Officer, on drugs.
Or a Priest visiting a sex worker.

We have companies/people preaching one thing to the public, whilst doing different things in secret, till they are found out and only then stopping it, that's the bad thing IMHO.

If you are going to do things like this, be open and up front about it in the 1st place.
 
Where does it say that in the privacy policy?

But keep moving the goalposts....
I moved no goalposts; maybe you don’t understand what that phrase means?

You said “Your conversation isn’t sent to Apple.” You’re wrong, and I corrected you. Nothing to do with “goalposts”.

The information is absolutely, unequivocally, without question sent to Apple. Siri requests are sent to Apple’s servers for processing, and stored by Apple for later analysis.

Why would you possibly think the data isn’t sent to Apple, let alone try to state it here as a fact? You’re wrong.
 
And where exactly is the opt out option? When you set you Alexa it actually tells you during the setup about its privacy and what you can opt out off... it doesn’t bury it in a 2 thousand word license agreement...
Also all your doing is highlighting the hypocrisy of Apple fans who complain and attempt to prove Google and Amazon are utterly evil companies who spy on your whilst defending Apple and its joke privacy policies and ad campaign.

[doublepost=1564733025][/doublepost]

Haha the best gif I’ve seen!
That was 2000 words? Seems like it’s right in your face. And as you say about the “fans”, the “critics blindly criticize”. Whoever both of these general fictional group of people are.
 
Last edited:
Why not just have volunteers. And not force review on everyone? #OptIn
That's essentially the direction they are moving to by giving people a choice (how that choice is presented is something we don't know yet). But if with volunteers meant something like Apple employees or public beta testers (ie, people that actively seek to be guinea pigs), that probably wouldn't have been a diverse enough sample.
 
They don’t have to install anything in your apartment. They can just turn on the microphone on any of your “smart” devices. You read this article and feel calm Apple is fixing it right? It’s ludicrous to believe them at this point.
There is really only one meaningful change they can make and they have announced that they are going to make it and that is giving people a choice. Everything else is just fine-tuning things. What exactly did they made you believe until now that got disproved by this Guardian article?

This whole current debate is about 'Actual humans might listen to my Siri requests?', which shouldn't have come as a shock to anybody, and accidental Siri invocations can happen more often and in situations you hadn't thought about. And the only real complaint is that Apple should have given people a choice whether to participate in this human review process or not.

You fantasies about dark forces turning on microphones probably became a theoretical concern once people got fixed line telephones in their homes, or at the latest once people got cellphones and computers connected to the internet. What this has to do with Siri and human review of Siri requests remains a mystery (apart from both topics involving microphones and network connections). Siri doesn't send any audio snippets to Apple unless things happening locally on the phone are starting that process (either the 'Siri button' is pressed or the local speech recognition logic thinks it heard 'Hey Siri').
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Crowbot and I7guy
Changed that to reflect the sentiment of the ADL. Any other company reported on here doing this would have righteous, vitriolic hate thrown its way by the paragraph load.
This cannot be said enough.....if this were any other company but Apple they would be villainized here....
There are some who just blindly defend for no reason......
It is ok to be an Apple fan and still not agree with everything they do as a company.
 
It's amazing how many people are attempting to downplay this incident. Apple has been collecting voice data since Siri went public. That's A LOT of data. When using an Apple watch, Siri can be invoked and it's hard to tell it's listening a lot of times. I've looked down many times and noticed Siri is listening without my knowledge. Who knows how much of those conversations have been heard by outside contractors. Then you have HomePod. Now it's nothing but an overpriced bluetooth speaker if you turn off Siri because of this debacle. CarPlay... you gonna no longer use voice commands? If so, it's no longer a handsfree system which could get you in trouble in a lot of regions while driving your vehicle (if caught). Who knows what else Apple is doing with our data for all these years.
 
....Who knows what else Apple is doing with our data for all these years.
This is a FUD statement. It’s a good question, but one that can be asked everywhere, from the government to the smallest mom and pop store that has our credit card information.

As far as Apple goes, I believe they are acting within their privacy policies, although consumer protection is a process and not something that one can flip a switch and just turn on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crowbot
This is a FUD statement. It’s a good question, but one that can be asked everywhere, from the government to the smallest mom and pop store that has our credit card information.

As far as Apple goes, I believe they are acting within their privacy policies, although consumer protection is a process and not something that one can flip a switch and just turn on.
remember this....Guess that's was a lie huh? When Apple poked fun at others when they had privacy issues come to light.
Why do you blindly defend them?
 

Attachments

  • staysOniPhone.png
    staysOniPhone.png
    447.8 KB · Views: 77
This is a FUD statement. It’s a good question, but one that can be asked everywhere, from the government to the smallest mom and pop store that has our credit card information.

As far as Apple goes, I believe they are acting within their privacy policies, although consumer protection is a process and not something that one can flip a switch and just turn on.
But those other entities don't also have a slogan what happens or your (insert Apple Device), stays on it. We just assume it and hope for the best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.