i'm hoping that Apps will be playable as Treyarch have just released COD5 Nazi Zombies on the iPhone and it looks deep!!!
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Tablet Speculation Continuing to Gain Attention
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
i'm hoping that Apps will be playable as Treyarch have just released COD5 Nazi Zombies on the iPhone and it looks deep!!!
iPhone vs iTablet Rumors
Wonder how many articles about a rumored iPhone there were pre-iPhone launch vs. how many articles there are about the iTablet?
And is there any possibility that Apple is actually feeding or generating some of these rumors as part of their marketing campaign for an Apple Tablet?
Wonder how many articles about a rumored iPhone there were pre-iPhone launch vs. how many articles there are about the iTablet?
And is there any possibility that Apple is actually feeding or generating some of these rumors as part of their marketing campaign for an Apple Tablet?
great - at least we arent talking about steve jobs and the Beatles collection
good lord fanboys make me sick
good lord fanboys make me sick
Me thinks that the tablet rumors are getting too hyped and that when the tablet is really introduced it will be disappointing...
To waste time posting that when you could have been playing Minesweeper, or drawing with Paint.
Good lord trolls make me sick.
So you are talking about the netbook category. You would have either a full-featured tablet that would compete directly with a netbook and 2-3x the cost of a netbook, without a keyboard or any of that stuff.
Or you could have a featured controlled device like the iPhone or iPod touch platform (more features than those devices, but not open like an OS) in which you'd still be paying 2-3x for a netbook.
If a laptop is too expensive, then this tablet will be too. Same goes for size, at 10" its not really that small. I'm just curious how they well pitch this thing...it won't be a device we all *need* like we need computers or cell phones. I think it will be successful like the MBA. An expensive, more niche market.
Not at all. More like the iPod Touch category. A device that can be used standing up. Maybe something about the weight of a magazine or book you could read while waiting for the train. I use my iPhone for that, but I have to squint a bit, or get out my reading glasses. If I didn't have an iPhone, and some networked device with a bit larger display were available...
Of course. But given that Apple is Apple, they could very well be quite successful at profitably selling a lot of something that is "too expensive". The comparison to netbooks could follow the same story line as Apple's current comparison to Nokia. Nokia may sell a lot more smartphones, but Apple makes more money selling iPhones, even though they started with a crazy initial price, and were even missing basic smartphone features at first.
I hope we don't have another fiasco of an innovative product tied to a certain carrier (*coughs* AT&T *coughs*) that requires a contract (that's AT&T again). I'd like to think Apple customers would revolt in overwhelming numbers, but I think a pretty sizable number would sell their soul to the devil (AT&T once again) to get it (much like the iPhone), which is quite frightening.
If Apple can sell out their integrity of putting customers first to get a sweetheart deal (tied to one wireless company), I'm sure they will. Why? Because this isn't quite an iPhone, isn't quite a computer, (so let's call it a glorified iPhone) and why not get the most profits possible by tying it, even if it means infuriating customers?
I HOPE I'm proven wrong though!!!
If Apple can sell out their integrity of putting customers first to get a sweetheart deal (tied to one wireless company), I'm sure they will. Why? Because this isn't quite an iPhone, isn't quite a computer, (so let's call it a glorified iPhone) and why not get the most profits possible by tying it, even if it means infuriating customers?
I HOPE I'm proven wrong though!!!
My thoughts about what apple might be up to. We assume, it's a tablet, or at least somthing flat with a big touch screen. The iPhone is about 4.5 x 2.5 inches, let's assume it's something at least three times the size, 4.5 x 7.5 inches. That's not very big but big enough to see something and small enough to carry it. As it is a device which by it's very purpose should be held in one hand, it must not weight much more than 300 grams. The iPhone weights about 150 grams. Three times this weight and by optimizing the space and weight, the tablet could actually weight just 300 grams. Thats what the physical goals are.
What can you fit inside such a box? The screen, CPU, GPU, RAM, Flashmemory, Notworking, Huge Battery. As Apple tends to go wireless, there are possibly very few connectors, like for example for headphones and of course a docking connector.
What can you expect to be on the device? Huge computing power is not possible, so aside from browsing and using little apps, there is not much possibility. But maybe this device just acts as a remote, reducing the computing power to just display content and the actual performance tasks are done on a remote computer. The pixelcount is small enough to stream lossless (or almost lossless) to the device or maybe, there even is the possibility that the device just receives cocoa messages and displays the contents accordingly. If so, the computing power of the device could be reduced drastically which allows to make it very thin (less heat issues).
Where could this device be used? Anywhere where a person just needs to do a quick task and exchanging data with a server, for example when doing inventory, postmen signing mails, doctors checking patients, ... There sure is a market for that, the existing devices just are not appropriate enough.
Just my thoughts, Would be nice, IF there will actually be something.
What can you fit inside such a box? The screen, CPU, GPU, RAM, Flashmemory, Notworking, Huge Battery. As Apple tends to go wireless, there are possibly very few connectors, like for example for headphones and of course a docking connector.
What can you expect to be on the device? Huge computing power is not possible, so aside from browsing and using little apps, there is not much possibility. But maybe this device just acts as a remote, reducing the computing power to just display content and the actual performance tasks are done on a remote computer. The pixelcount is small enough to stream lossless (or almost lossless) to the device or maybe, there even is the possibility that the device just receives cocoa messages and displays the contents accordingly. If so, the computing power of the device could be reduced drastically which allows to make it very thin (less heat issues).
Where could this device be used? Anywhere where a person just needs to do a quick task and exchanging data with a server, for example when doing inventory, postmen signing mails, doctors checking patients, ... There sure is a market for that, the existing devices just are not appropriate enough.
Just my thoughts, Would be nice, IF there will actually be something.
Yeah that's an interesting idea that I like. Maybe not completely tied to a computer but in times where there's no connection, the device could use its own processor and stuff.
Except that this engineering tradeoff makes more sense. You're better off burning the cpu power locally than burning even more power to keep the radios on (plus suffering the latency and chewing bandwidth).
You can already do this using an iPhone or iPod Touch plus a VNC or Remote Desktop app (there are about a dozen of these in the App store). Run Flash on your Mac or PC, and view the results on your iDevice.
OnLive is a startup company that wants to stream games from a big server farm of power hungry GPUs in the "cloud", and display these game on your iPhone (or other similar low power device).
etc.
I still think Apple may be right now making its final decision to use either a modified ARM processor (using PA Semiconductor technology) or go with Intel's new Atom N450 dual-core low-power CPU.
Why the Atom N450? Because it would offer excellent performance with very low power consumption, which will be necessary given what the tablet computer can do. And most importantly, it also means very easy porting of current Mac applications to this machine (no need to recompile the code from scratch like you will need with an ARM-based CPU).
I do think the device will keep the standard iPod dock connector, since this is sufficient for copying files to and from a larger laptop or desktop computer through the USB 2.0 interface.
As for internal storage, we may see an SSD of around 128 to 256 GB, since the device is big enough to accommodate such an SSD internally.
Why the Atom N450? Because it would offer excellent performance with very low power consumption, which will be necessary given what the tablet computer can do. And most importantly, it also means very easy porting of current Mac applications to this machine (no need to recompile the code from scratch like you will need with an ARM-based CPU).
I do think the device will keep the standard iPod dock connector, since this is sufficient for copying files to and from a larger laptop or desktop computer through the USB 2.0 interface.
As for internal storage, we may see an SSD of around 128 to 256 GB, since the device is big enough to accommodate such an SSD internally.
That's why Apple won't do it. Easily ported apps kill new product niches. The ported apps would be unsuitable, but still strongly reduce incentive to rewrite the apps more appropriately for the platform. That's why Apple often changes the APIs to make it much harder to port than to rewrite for new platforms (For Lisa, Mac, Cocoa, iPhone, and maybe whatever's next).
WinMob makes app porting easier, and has a larger app library to port from. Look how well that product is doing. Look how well Windows tablets sell to the general public. It's a proven bad idea.
If Apple keeps waiting and waiting, and meanwhile the media keep talking about massive demand for a tablet, then Apple's competition will grab the idea by the horns and become first to market. A Windows 7 Tablet. I don't think any of us around Apple want that. Apple needs to hurry up. The media has already hyped the idea and the public demand has skyrocketed. Someone needs to fulfill the demand soon. Who will be first? Apple or Microsoft?