I will definitely be buying a hard-copy. It's always been reliable for me. If somethings not broke don't try and fix it.
I'm a developer - if I want to install any app from a command line, I don't wanna lose that ability, or even be remotely pushed into a 'preferred' direction about how I should install apps, thank you very much.
yes, I'm sure we all read that. it doesn't really answer any questions though.
i have physical versions of iLife and iWork (or did, actually). my family lost our iWork disc. I still have it installed on my hard drive. I COULD buy it from the app store, but it'd cost me full price (again).
what if I buy Lion from the app store, then my computer fails or i replace the hard drive. yes, i do have the option of buying a physical disc, but i'd have to pay full price (again).
if they allow to app store version to be burned to disc or copied to USB drive, awesome, that'll solve the problem. however, so far this is being presented as a digital download, not an alternative means to get a physical copy.
I have as well & will not back down.I've been boycotting the App Store until now and don't intend to change this.
"Preferred" is too strong of a language.
Make that "optional".
I'm a developer - if I want to install any app from a command line, I don't wanna lose that ability, or even be remotely pushed into a 'preferred' direction about how I should install apps, thank you very much.
Not like if it will ever be dumbed down to this point, but if Apple makes it "mandatory" to install apps via "Mac App Store", I'll sell the Mac, buy a thinkpad and put Linux on it for good.
Fine. Seems like a logical move, but if Apple wants me to foot part of the bill for distributing their software (via my paid Internet connection) then I certainly expect a significant cut in the cost of the upgrade.
Putting it on the Mac App Store raises an interesting issue about licencing - they said that purchases could be used on any Mac that you use.
That opens them up to a lot of abuse.
The licence is only for one computer.
If you want to install it on a different machine you must uninstall the original copy first.
The Mac App Store says:
"You can install apps on every Mac you use and even download them again."
That implies that if I go on a friend's computer for 5 minutes once a year I could install Lion on it for no charge.
Which is different from the current practice of not requiring a software key to install from optical disk how, exactly?
Read it again. All of it.
A "Mac that you use" is one that you've got registered with your Mac/iTunes account, of which you can have up to five.
One of them might well be your friend's, or your mom's, but would still count as one of the five total.
Precisely!"Preferred" is too strong of a language.
Make that "optional".
I'm a developer - if I want to install any app from a command line, I don't wanna lose that ability, or even be remotely pushed into a 'preferred' direction about how I should install apps, thank you very much.
Not like if it will ever be dumbed down to this point, but if Apple makes it "mandatory" to install apps via "Mac App Store", I'll sell the Mac, buy a thinkpad and put Linux on it for good.
While I think Apple should make Mac OS X available as a download, I'd rather that it was done as a .iso that customers could burn to a DVD.
I don't like the idea of having to install Snow Leopard first before installing Lion in the event of needing to restore.
Putting it on the Mac App Store raises an interesting issue about licencing - they said that purchases could be used on any Mac that you use.
That opens them up to a lot of abuse.
I have as well & will not back down.
Sadly, after well over a decade Apple may force me to abandon what have become nothing more than iToys.
Time to find a professional computing environment.
I'm not sure what you being a developer has anything to do with this. Every developer I know double-clicks their installers in the Finder like everyone else.