Ballsy!
I don't think I could blatantly admit my failings as a parent to perfect strangers. Granted, as a single father... I've been blessed with a super well-behaved young man. He does enjoy his Apple gear, though his phones are always hand me down from pops, but his 4.0 GPA & 2100 SAT did earn him a tricked out Mac Mini this holiday.
However, if he EVER started exhibiting the embarrassing & despicable behavior you're describing... honestly, who could I blame but myself?? Children are a direct product of their environment. He sees me struggling to provide him with as much as I am able, and that he deserves... & has appropriate gratitude.
Good luck with yours in the future, though I suspect you'll receive better advice posting this sort of a thing on a parenting message board than here.
You sound like a fine parent. Wtf is wrong with these people?
Btw the horse**** they serve at McD's ....
This is my BROTHER's daughter.
Anyways.... Get married, and have 3 kids and live on a budget.
You family earns, say, $1,000 a week. ($50,000 a year job).
After all the expenses or food/clothing/shelter/taxes/car payments/insurance/etc, you have maybe $1,000 spending money
for the entire MONTH for the entire FAMILY.
$100 is a LOT for ONE kid for 3 days, after you're already spending $200 for the 3-day trip.
Why should the kid get Lobster & Steak when the family can't afford it? It's ridiculous.
I guess tell the other kids that they have to eat ramen noodles the rest of the month
so the one daughter can live like a queen for 3 days.
If you displayed a little less pride, condemnation, and a little more reading comprehension we would both be better off.😉 You read my quote and created a narrative in your head that has absolutely nothing to do with my comment.😕
I will do you a favor and explain what my quote actually meant. I said she was mad. Kids get mad. Secret: yours does too. Horrible parent portion? Hyperbole on my behalf. How you take an inane quip about teenagers and turn it into a binary treatise on bad parent vs good parent; now that is ballsy.😱 Turn off your inner monologue and try reading my quote again. Nothing in it comes close to your take.
And you're exactly right. If your kid exhibits the embarrassing and despicable behavior you displayed in your quote. You can blame no one but yourself. 😉 Now if you'll excuse me, I must release the kid from the shackles in the basement... so I can beat her. 😀😛
Apologies to all other forum members for going so far off topic.
Apologies if I incorrectly read your post...
It's amusing to hear the number of comments from people who are already completely sure the Apple Watch is ugly, of no use to them or anybody else, when they've never actually seen one, or held one in their hands, let alone, used one.
Isn't it equally amusing to hear the number of comments from people who are saying "shut up and take my money", when they've never actually seen one, or held one in their hands, let alone, used one? 😉
I see first generation as limited to the enthusiast, 2nd generation to a wider audience, with enhanced features, and 3rd generation to really be a necessary item.
It seems to be the way of things.
its quite possible the market has moved before Apple got out the door. This is going to be the realm of health and activity monitors, not replicating in limited fashion what your full size phone does.
Now, when it can be the phone as well as the H/A monitor call me.
I'll add one more to that list if I may: by announcing when they did they dropped a small tactical nuke on the rest of the wearables industry for the Christmas shopping season. Even thought the Apple Watch wouldn't be out until 2015 just the knowledge that Apple were entering the market was enough to make a lot of people postpone purchases. Basically they had nothing to lose by announcing ahead of time, avoided any possible leaks of the final design once production started and it fit the narrative for that event of this being Tim's Apple.
Can't wait to be shocked by the stainless steel price tag
Number one, I'm not the one who bought up McDonald's as a lunch choice.
The other guy did. And number two, the McDonald's Corporation is run by some
fine folks who are doing thier darndest to make sure me & my family
are well taking care of by selling as much 100% USDA Grade "A" beef
and Idaho Russett potatoes as is possible in order to make the stock price viable.
Stock in which I am a proud participant of, mister!
apple uses stainless steel for their price tags?
Apple uses stainless steel for their price tags?
Isn't it equally amusing to hear the number of comments from people who are saying "shut up and take my money", when they've never actually seen one, or held one in their hands, let alone, used one? 😉
Most people don't windsurf, sail, or surf. Runners (I'm one) and cyclers don't need a waterproof watch -- something that can withstand pressure of being submerged. (My running watch is water proof to 50m, but I'll never use that feature since I don't run underwater). Water resistant is good enough. So while, waterproof is a must for you, its a gimmick for everyone else. I consider a feature a gimmick if it doesn't enhance functionality and it's just there to be a marketing line.
OTOH, I like the idea of having a mirror and remote to my iPhone on my wrist, just as I like not having to dig for my car keys to open the door or trunk when my hands are full. It's about efficiency and convenience. I and others paid $500 for that feature, and that's just one feature, unlike the multitude of tasks a smart watch can do.
If I can glance at my wrist to read a text while in the middle of something else rather than having to stop and dig out my phone -- yes, please. If I can skip a song while running, or stop the music completely without having to fish out my phone, genius I say. And if I can wear the same watch at a meeting as I do while running -- gathering up fitness data the whole time, that's perfect. Then there are all the other apps coming like Apple Pay being even more convenient.
So while it may not be the watch for you, to say the entire watch a gimmick is a bridge too far. It offers functionality and efficiency to those who understand the value of increased productivity. If the watch is everything Apple is saying it is -- and we only know part of the story now, it will sell just fine and for a long time. The smart watch era is upon us. Apple will be a player.
----------
Which is why I usually buy the 1st and 3rd generations. The iPad was an exception to my usual rule in that I bought the first, second and iPad Air.
Watch!The thing about waterproofness is not just about "im going diving". Its also about how much water it can take (out of water) during activity and "under pressure". I've been a high competing runner, biker, swimmer (triathlete) and if you want to clean your stuff properly, it needs to go under water and get a gentle rub. And if you have been in open water this is very important, since the salt needs to be washed of.
Im glad if you (and some others) like it. And Im sure that this watch will sell in tons. But not to people like me, who like to live an easy living with as few gadgets as possible. I think this watch is a "gimmick", but it is built on my impression of the specs and the launch keynote, which presented the watched in a very "gimmick-like" manner. And this was a feeling that many viewers had following the keynote - see olders forum threads. But yes it will sell, but mostly to teens in Asia, and people who just love gadgets and who likes buying on a more "nice to have" than "need to have" basis.
But - good for those who buy it (and like it)! Still; no waterproff = no smartwatch for me.
And that's fine, but it wasn't your original contention, and you even managed to be more judgmental with the Asian teens comment. I won't rehash that. But I agree the pre-announce demo (it wasn't a launch -- a launch is for imminent release, and the Apple Watch at the time was still pre-production) was more flash and dash than substantive. But it was a pre-production OS. Much of the functionality was still being baked and few 3rd party support apps to demo either.
The demo didn't sell me either because few details were released, but it definitely piqued my interest. I'll wait to see all the facts; the finished product, functionality, and 3rd party support, before I make a final judgment.
Press invite:
Time for Spring!

The thing about waterproofness is not just about "im going diving". Its also about how much water it can take (out of water) during activity and "under pressure". I've been a high competing runner, biker, swimmer (triathlete) and if you want to clean your stuff properly, it needs to go under water and get a gentle rub. And if you have been in open water this is very important, since the salt needs to be washed of.
Im glad if you (and some others) like it. And Im sure that this watch will sell in tons. But not to people like me, who like to live an easy living with as few gadgets as possible. I think this watch is a "gimmick", but it is built on my impression of the specs and the launch keynote, which presented the watched in a very "gimmick-like" manner. And this was a feeling that many viewers had following the keynote - see olders forum threads. But yes it will sell, but mostly to teens in Asia, and people who just love gadgets and who likes buying on a more "nice to have" than "need to have" basis.
But - good for those who buy it (and like it)! Still; no waterproff = no smartwatch for me.
Take it easy Chupa. My original post was:
"No waterproof = no deal (its 2015 - Apple!!!)"
Then someone replied me, and I wrote back, and you quoted me for that response (out of context). So no "contentions" from my side - just a few words about why Im not going to buy it.
And the asien teens comment: I think teens all over the world will love it. Probably even "the teen version" of myself. And since Asia is such a big part of the world, Asien teens will play a major role in the demand for Apple watches. And if they going to love it, it will sell huge (= become a succes) Thats the point of the statement. You're going for the man, not the ball.
But, good to here you like the watch!
My original post was:
"No waterproof = no deal (its 2015 - Apple!!!)"
And therefore I have no reason to buy it - and I cant see why this should sell to others besides being a funny gimmick for a short periode.