My feeling is it will probably be technically impressive. But is it going to want to make more than a niche strap a computer to their faces? Especially at that price point? We shall see.
Well, maybe Evan Blass' "friend-of-a-friend who totally exists and isn't made up at all" can tell people if it's worth it... I mean it only costs about 10x more than Meta's 300-ish dollar headset, so maybe it's 10x as good?It will be expensive at over $3,000, and limited in usefulness to begin with.
It all comes down to is the leaker reliable and in this case it is.This is dumb. A sample size of 1 is not a good/reliable indicator of how good or bad something is.
Is this a fitness workout or a viurtual game? Motion sickness has kicked in... Now I have a headache
If you gave someone a 4K per eye VR/AR headset with an M2 chip, I'm sure it would blow the vast majority of people away with ease. VR/AR is the kind of technology that would do that, especially at that quality.Uh-huh…Sure
/s
Here comes the hype campaign
So much of everything is BS and hype now…and so little actual substance
Is this thing still going to be counting on “dumber than rocks” Siri?
Yup. Always wait for 4th gen with Apple with their new main product lines (not accessories)As with most new Apple products, V1 will have pain points that are usually largely fixed in V2, and by V4 the leaps will be quite apparent.
Obviously he can't make up his mind.I love how people said Tim Cook was leaking bad news about it so that it be easy to exceed expectations and now people are saying he is responsible for leaking good news about it.
They finished the first app for it?So in just a couple months this alleged tester has gone from meh to blow away take my money? Count me skeptical, mostly because I’m not sure what could have changed technology wise in such a short amount of time. This seems more like an intentional leak by Apple to get some hype behind this.
This is classic Apple PR. Leak "delays" for "not meeting standards," and "encountering technical hurdles," and then a short time later, leak a "breakthrough" that makes the product so "bleeding edge" that reviewers are "blown away." Apple gets the best of both worlds: showing they are "obsessed with delighting customers," so they take time to perfect things while also showing how incredible innovative and revolutionary they are. All the while, Apple has the devices locked-in for months before they let anyone external to the team, let alone company, experience the product. Pay close attention to the "iterate" and "new models are already in the works." Apple learned an important lesson with the HomePod - don't release a produce with every possible feature, because there is no clear upgrade path.Either those negative articles a couple weeks ago were Apple trying to set expectations low so people would be more impressed, or this leak is Apple trying to play damage control.
So Apple is for sure doing one of two dire opposites, whichever comes to mind first today. Got ya.Either those negative articles a couple weeks ago were Apple trying to set expectations low so people would be more impressed, or this leak is Apple trying to play damage control.
Or as the article state this us a more up to date opinion of the product.Either those negative articles a couple weeks ago were Apple trying to set expectations low so people would be more impressed, or this leak is Apple trying to play damage control.
This has nothing to do with whether the leaker is reliable or not. This is about 1 person's opinion of Apple's VR/AR headset. Who is this tester? We don't know.It all comes down to is the leaker reliable and in this case it is.