Sure: Either black bubbles/black text or white bubbles/white text. Your choice.They are going to still use a different color for those messages?
Sure: Either black bubbles/black text or white bubbles/white text. Your choice.They are going to still use a different color for those messages?
not sure what you mean by 'relearning' of rcsGetting tired of people who don't even try to understand what this entails. There is no relearning of RCS what is, lol.
no the differentiation actually serves a purpose (as I've said bedsore in this discussion) it does warn you about the use of sms that (per byte) could be (depending on contracts/bundle with carrier and location of the other party (integrational/domestic)) way more expensive than an iMessage, if rcs will be free there is no reason for distinguishing between rcs and iMessage , but there is still an argument for distinguishing between rcs+Imessage and SMS. No I.m not from Scotland but I'm half Dutch so that might explain my over focus on categorizing messages according to possible delivery costsMore colors is just a mess. There really should be only one color - having a "special color" for iMessage is just annoying - I understand why it might have been needed since SMS had significantly less functionality than iMessage, but if RCS brings enough parity, ideally it should be just one color and they can have some kind of sender-visible warning if they try to use iMessage-exclusive features when sending a message.
Like average people care about encryption at all or know about it. Those shallow people only care about blue vs green bubbles.Originally all of the texts were green. Later on they added encryption between iPhone users, and that's what blue signified. They didn't change the app icon color, probably because it would have confused people.
Like average people care about encryption at all or know about it. Those shallow people only care about blue vs green bubbles.
The Facebook owned messaging app that mines your data and records your conversations? Hmmmm...wonder what the problem could be.
Fascinating that it is ‘a thing’.
Is RCS even supported by carriers outside the US yet?
Here in the UK, I have exactly 1 contact out of 2.6K who used iMessage. Telegram, Instagram, Facebook Messenger are all orders of magnitude more popular than iMessage. WhatsApp has been the universal standard for about 8-10 years. They are completely dominating the market. The UK government famously ‘runs’ on WhatsApp. 99.9% of my use of the Messages app is for 2FA codes. The last time I sent and received an MMS, it turns out, was on an iPhone 3GS.
RCS does work in the UK. I think most European carriers support it.Fascinating that it is ‘a thing’.
Is RCS even supported by carriers outside the US yet?
Here in the UK, I have exactly 1 contact out of 2.6K who used iMessage. Telegram, Instagram, Facebook Messenger are all orders of magnitude more popular than iMessage. WhatsApp has been the universal standard for about 8-10 years. They are completely dominating the market. The UK government famously ‘runs’ on WhatsApp. 99.9% of my use of the Messages app is for 2FA codes. The last time I sent and received an MMS, it turns out, was on an iPhone 3GS.
They could say though, look EU, this is our compatibility layer. Now other messengers can hook up to that.I don’t think introducing RCS would preclude iMessage from being regulated by the EU.
I think the RCS that the vast majority of people are using is the RCS universal profile with added google flavours.RCS does work in the UK. I think most European carriers support it.
If the point of the law is to stop message protocols from acting as gatekeepers, I can’t see how adding another protocol fixes that. For instance, the EU has said that people messaging using the WhatsApp messaging protocol must be able to send/receive messages from users using a different protocol.They could say though, look EU, this is our compatibility layer. Now other messengers can hook up to that.
We don’t yet know what level of encryption RCS messages will have. I suspect probably some level of encryption, but not E2EE. I guess that’s why they’ll remain green as they’ll be relatively insecure messages vs iMessage.Great news and one that I didn’t expect. The legislators must’ve been circling.
But using green still for rcs seems petty.
I’m not expecting them to use blue, but a very good obvious way to denote encrypted rcs would be good.
A colour other than green would be a good way to easily do this.
Else, I hope there will at least be a clear icon indicator that it’s encrypted rcs, if they must still use green for it.
I still see a lot of people are confusing the Apple Messages app with iMessage.
I don’t think introducing RCS would preclude iMessage from being regulated by the EU. The EU regulations are based on company size and number of users. From all accounts, iMessage does not meet the number of users threshold to be designated a gatekeeper.
I suspect the argument probably is down to how you count number of users. WhatsApp and Facebook messenger must very clearly be over the threshold regardless of how you count. Interestingly, they weren’t prepared to compromise either.I’d say of few things here:
1) The EU still hasn’t designated iMessage as a gatekeeper as apparently it is borderline and there is an argument on how to count users. If they are in a grey area and there is an ongoing discussion, this could be a way to send an appeasing message after years of refusing compromise (basically that would be Apple acknowledging that never showing any goodwill worked for a while, but is now leading to authorities cracking down on them - and Europe probably first before others areas join-in).
2) Or if they want to go a more confrontational way, having RCS support as a backup puts a nuclear option on the table for Apple: if they were really unhappy with how the EU wants to regulate iMessage, they could just disable it in the EU and tell European users they’ll have to revered back to RCS to to the EU not allowing them to run iMessage anymore. Like with actual nuclear weapons, even if they don’t use that option, the simple fact that it is on the table could influence discussion with the EU in Apple’s favour.
How so? How is iOS going to suffer by having better messaging built in? Please give examples of how it will make the OS observably worse.
This will not hurt your iMessage chats, it will however make things better for those who don't want to own an overpriced iPhone but wish to chat with their friends/family without Apple deliberately trying to make them out to be social outcasts and freaks for not wanting to line Tims pockets.
I’d imagine android would have a higher market share when you can buy an android phone for $29 in America lol. And probably even cheaper in 3rd world countries.Ohh the horror of letting users to have choices... also iPhone has less than 30% market share worldwide (~35% in the EU), so majority of people would not even notice if the iPhone would just disappear.
This is particularly painful because nearly every kid now has an iPhone for this exact reason. Any kid without an iPhone is basically an outcast because they will get kicked or explicitly excluded from every conversation. Source: parent of 5 kids
Ugh I hope we do not get to a point where android variants are all we have. It’s a terrible os in all flavors of android.And iOS becomes just another variant of Android. What’s next, regulators force Apple to adopt Android as the iPhone’s operating system? At this point that doesn’t sound so far off the mark when it’s supposedly all about customer convenience.
Yeah it’s great to see them make use of these brand new, just released to the market features.great to see Apple picking up the pace of innovation by adopting usb-c and now rcs. Leading from behind all the way!