Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They can already do that by either both using iMessage or both using WhatsApp. They don’t need another protocol to do that.

It seems like a very narrow subset of users you are referring to where both refuse to or don’t already use the messaging service that the other already uses to need yet another messaging protocol to solve that.
I'm old enough to remember how great apps like Pidgin were at consolidating all your IM services into a single app.
 
You must not live in the US. Apple has a ~60% market share in the US. It's much closer to 100% when you look at the under 25 demographic. The vast majority of those users use the default Apple Messages app to communicate. If you are on an Android device that puts you in a very difficult situation. There's no way you can get all those people to switch to a different app that is available on android. So, all your communication with Apple users is a painful experience.
I live in the UK. It’s either imessage or WhatsApp here with no issues communicating with anyone on any platform.

It seems strange that some of you Americans complain you can’t message cross-platform, yet the rest of world seem to do it without issue. You seem to have no issue installing a myriad of apps for other functionality, yet installing cross-platform messaging services is apparently beyond your abilities.

its just so… weird.
 
Last edited:
I live in the UK. It’s either imessage or WhatsApp here with no issues communicating with anyone on any platform.

It seems strange that some of you Americans complain you can’t message cross-platform, yet the rest of world seem to do it without issue.
The rest of the world didn't evolve through the cell phone growth where carrier texting has been essentially free. We never had the push to move to other messaging platforms the way Europe has. The result is that the carrier apps (sms on Android, iMessage on iPhone) became the dominant platforms instead of the third party apps becoming the dominant platforms. Right now, those 2 ecosystems don't play nicely together
 
Last edited:
The rest of the world didn't evolve through the cell phone growth where carrier texting has been essentially free. We never had the push to move to other messaging platforms the way Europe has. The result is that the carrier apps became the dominant platforms instead of the third party apps becoming the dominant platforms
That explains how you got to this situation, but doesn’t really explain why you can’t use these cross-platform messaging services. I keep hearing Americans complaining about the cross-platform messaging experience, but you are acting as if you are completely helpless and that there aren’t dozens of cross-platform messaging services available to you.

As I’ve said many times, cross-platform messaging has been a solved problem for a very long time. Some people just can’t seem to find their way to the solution for some reason. Maybe Americans just want to be spoon fed things? I don’t really know what the reason is.

This is what makes me think that either Americans really are that stupid, or the issue isn’t actually the functionality of SMS/MMS, and really is just about the colour of the bubble. Either way, RCS isn’t gonna fix anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy and dave559
That explains how you got to this situation, but doesn’t really explain why you can’t use these cross-platform messaging services. I keep hearing Americans complaining about the cross-platform messaging experience, but you are acting as if you are completely helpless and that there aren’t dozens of cross-platform messaging services available to you.

As I’ve said many times, cross-platform messaging has been a solved problem for a very long time. Some people just can’t seem to find their way to the solution for some reason. Maybe Americans just want to be spoon fed things? I don’t really know what the reason is.
If I showed up in Europe, and demanded that everyone I wanted to communicate with needs to use XYZ app that no one else is currently using, what do you think would happen? Everyone would then download another communication app, create yet another account just to appease me? Doubtful. They would tell me to get with the program and conform to what they are already using. That's the situation here. You just have the benefit of having organically evolved into a better situation than we're in. If the situation were reversed, you'd be in exactly the same place we are. It's not a "lazy American" problem.
 
If I showed up in Europe, and demanded that everyone I wanted to communicate with needs to use XYZ app that no one else is currently using, what do you think would happen? Everyone would then download another communication app, create yet another account just to appease me? Doubtful. They would tell me to get with the program and conform to what they are already using. That's the situation here.
But everyone who uses a cross-platform messaging app, at some point, had to download and create an account for that messaging app. If the rest of the world can do it, so can American’s, if it really is actually important to them. The fact that they don’t suggests to me that cross-platform chat functionality is not that important to American people.

My predication is that for the American people who are interested in cross-platform messaging, they'll have already solved the problem by using an over the top messaging service. RCS won’t be useful to these people.

For the American’s who aren’t interested in cross-platform messaging, or specifically don’t want certain colour bubbles in their chat, RCS won’t be useful to these people.

The number of people who care about cross-platform messaging but haven’t yet figured out how to do it must be a vanishingly small number of people at this point.
 
Last edited:
But everyone who uses a cross-platform messaging app, at some point, had to download and create an account for that messaging app. If the rest of the world can do it, so can American’s, if it really is actually important to them. The fact that they don’t suggests to me that cross-platform chat functionality is not that important to American people.

My predication is that for the American people who are interested in cross-platform messaging, they'll have already solved the problem by using an over the top messaging service. RCS won’t be useful to these people.

For the American’s who aren’t interested in cross-platform messaging, or specifically don’t want certain colour bubbles in their chat, RCS won’t be useful to these people.

The number of people who care about cross-platform messaging but haven’t yet figured out how to do it must be a vanishingly small number of people at this point.
If by vanishingly small, you mean 325 million people in the US, then you're right on the mark... Use of third party messaging app (signal, WhatsApp, telegram, etc) is basically non-existent here. I use WhatsApp between my wife and I (android to iPhone). But literally no one else I know uses it. You can't just get the entire ecosystem to move rapidly enough to fix the problem. You just have the benefit of having organically evolved into a better situation. That doesn't mean you're entitled to stand on your soap box and dictate we're all stupid and lazy because we have a difficult situation to work through.

And... In our current situation, RCS will absolutely make the situation significantly better.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ki77erb
Google and Samsung ads talked about the green bubble in their ads. Definitely they cared

They never gave a rat's ###, they just wanted to put pressure on Apple. The real money is in Google serving ads on their own proprietary RCS, driving more people to Android for their services and ads/tracking, etc. You don't hear a lot about the ads today, but 6-8 years ago when Google acquired Jibe and started pushing RCS you would hear a lot about ads and how rich media would revitalize that paradigm.

In any event if anyone thinks Google (or Apple) does any of this for the good of society, I've got a bridge to sell you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy
They never gave a rat's ###, they just wanted to put pressure on Apple. The real money is in Google serving ads on their own proprietary RCS, driving more people to Android for their services and ads/tracking, etc. You don't hear a lot about the ads today, but 6-8 years ago when Google acquired Jibe and started pushing RCS you would hear a lot about ads and how rich media would revitalize that paradigm.

In any event if anyone thinks Google (or Apple) does any of this for the good of society, I've got a bridge to sell you.
I have been on Google's Jibe RCS server for 2 years and have NEVER received an ad through RCS messages
 
They never gave a rat's ###, they just wanted to put pressure on Apple. The real money is in Google serving ads on their own proprietary RCS, driving more people to Android for their services and ads/tracking, etc. You don't hear a lot about the ads today, but 6-8 years ago when Google acquired Jibe and started pushing RCS you would hear a lot about ads and how rich media would revitalize that paradigm.

In any event if anyone thinks Google (or Apple) does any of this for the good of society, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Google RSC user here on a Pixel 7. Never once had an ad show up in Google Messages. In fact it activity blocks spam texts. Google and Apple do care about privacy and security when it comes to communication between people. Less so when it comes to search, browsing and app stores.
 
This is demonstrably false information. You really should take the time to education yourself on E2EE. They are using the Signal protocol. Are you suggesting that Google has somehow hacked one of the most secure communication protocols being used today? If you believe it's that easy, what makes you think Apple doesn't hold the keys to their own E2EE in iMessage? See how dumb that sounds?
Yes. I do. They've said as much. Why else would they be pushing for iMessage to use it? Having iMessage using RCS does nothing for them unless they can mine data to monetize.

Who said anything about Apple using encryption? I sure didn't. See how dumb making assumptions sounds?
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy
It will go through Google servers since no wireless carrier in the United States supports the RCS standard currently, since T Mobile is shutting down their RCS server.
I personally don't think so. If anything, even though they're adding RCS (and sideloading) after all this time, Apple being stubborn as always would be my guess and would rather create a different path.

But we'll see what it ends up being.
 
Having iMessage using RCS does nothing for them unless they can mine data to monetize.
It improves the user experience for users of Google's operating system, removing one of the major reasons some people cite for purchasing iPhones instead of Android phones.
 
Google Jibe is Universal Profile. Google added E2EE extension on top of UP. When Apple adds UP in the iMessage stack, it will work with Google Jibe but without the E2EE extension. When Apple decides they want to add E2EE. it will work with Google Jibe with E2EE. Google E2EE extension is not proprietary. They are using the opensource signal encryption protocol and soon will be adding the MLS encryption protocol which is another international standard being developed for cross platform encryption. UP will be updated to support Google's E2EE extension as all major carriers in the US have chosen to use Google's RCS services as standard. They will also add MLS encryption protocol because that is the international standard being developed and Google has signed on to support it which again means all 3 major US carriers support it.
Were that the case, it wouldn't say that Apple was adopting UP. It would say Apple was adopting Jibe. But it's not because they're not the same thing. Jibe is Google's build of RCS, it's not UP. According to jibe dot google dot com Jibe is a platform that supports UP. Therefore it is not UP itself. Jibe also is only supporting Android currently per the GSMA's site.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy
Yes. I do. They've said as much. Why else would they be pushing for iMessage to use it? Having iMessage using RCS does nothing for them unless they can mine data to monetize.

Who said anything about Apple using encryption? I sure didn't. See how dumb making assumptions sounds?
No they haven't said as much. I'm sorry but you're wrong. Google is using Signal protocol for encryption. They do not have the keys. Educating yourself isn't difficult. You're making a conscious choice to be ignorant when the information is readily available.
 
It doesn't matter if not all android users have upgraded, it is what is going on now. People are migrating and all new phones being sold since 2019 from major carriers and phone manufacturing were starting to default to Google and Google has made so anyone can use RCS by downloading the message app.

Just so we are on the same page, i use iPhone and several times a week, Apple deprecates my iMessage to SMS even when im texting someone on iMessage, mid conversation it switches back and forth. All these but Google sucks and RCS doesn't work is nonsense. iMessage doesn't work properly.
iVVpJZW.jpg


That's right, there is a green bubble issue within Apple's own ecosystem. No Android involved.
"People are migrating" until all are done migrating (which won't be done by the time Apple implements RCS), problem exists, and won't be solved "entirely" (using your word) until then. What's your point?
" were starting to default to Google and Google has made so anyone can use RCS" - Google doesn't exist in China. Google isn't the end game for 100% RCS. China slowly rolled RCS implementation a few years ago among the big carriers.

Don't see the relevancy in your iMessage falling back to SMS.
 
Well yeah. I guess if your point is that this isn't going to be a magic finger snap that instantly makes everything perfect...then yes, you're correct.
I made my point clear. There exist a massive flaw with regards to Apple and mms group messaging. Apple didn't sabotage it. It's simply not technically capable and will not be technically capable for quite some time in the future.
 
Were that the case, it wouldn't say that Apple was adopting UP. It would say Apple was adopting Jibe. But it's not because they're not the same thing. Jibe is Google's build of RCS, it's not UP. According to jibe dot google dot com Jibe is a platform that supports UP. Therefore it is not UP itself. Jibe also is only supporting Android currently per the GSMA's site.
If Jibe, which supports Universal Profile, is "not Universal Profile", then nothing is Universal Profile, including whatever Apple comes up with. The argument is pointless.
Yes. I do. They've said as much. Why else would they be pushing for iMessage to use it? Having iMessage using RCS does nothing for them unless they can mine data to monetize.

Who said anything about Apple using encryption? I sure didn't. See how dumb making assumptions sounds?
So you're suggesting that Google advertises E2EE but has secretly broken the scheme and is mining data?
  1. such a conspiracy would eventually leak and cause them extreme PR harm (so they wouldn't actually do this)
  2. the vast majority of non-iMessage messages sent from iPhones are already going to Google-controlled devices, so if Google were going to be that nefarious, they already have the data anyway.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: strongy
It doesn‘t it just levels the playing field. Google adopted the new standard „RCS“, Apple refused to causing all of their users to fallback to MMS when contacting Android users.
Now they add support for RCS, which instantly enables them to have modern texting with close to a billion devices out there capable of using RCS.

It‘s a mere get with the times situation, which will only accelerate the death of MMS.
completely off topic. re-read the thread of the discussion. like @SMH4KIDIOT, you're pivoting away from the original point and that is Apple didn't deliberately sabotage the ability to split iMessage users from MMS users to provide a better experience.
 
I (a single software developer) spent a whopping 5 minutes thinking about this problem
Well there's your problem. You didn't think about how someone would remove or leave from a group with MMS users because simply there is no technical capability to do so with MMS users. There's the flaw. That's why Apple didn't do what you suggested. Plain and simple. This is why UX designers design the story and developers don't touch their work.

Carry on.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.