The idea of a controversy over "right to repair" is ridiculous.
Of course you have a right to repair your phone, but
only at select places and with select people.
I drive a late model Jaguar. Think I can just go into any repair shop and have it fixed?
Nope. I have to take it to a Jaguar dealer or an authorized service provider, because Jaguar limits who has access to equipment, parts and diagnostics.
Apple does the same thing. Why? Because when something is not fixed correctly or there are problems, people inevitably blame Apple
in addition to the service provider.
It's a bad experience for everyone, so Apple limits who can tinker with their products so they can control for a positive experience.
It's vetting. That's all it is.
They're rightly suspicious of "Bob's Repair Shop" at a kiosk in the mall, but hey, if Bob wants to service Apple phones, guess what? He is free to do so if he proves he's not going to muck up your $1,000.00 phone.
If Bob is not interested in the vetting process, oh well.
This is such a non-story and a hoax of a controversy, pushed by people like Rossman, OWC and iFixit, because they are prevented from catering to a lucrative segment of the market.
That's all this is about.
Finally, if your argument is "Apple is greedy because they want the repair money themselves!", just stop.
The money they make from repairs is a blip on the radar, a rounding error. It's less than peanuts.
This is all about Apple zealously guarding their brand.
They have a right to do it. Don't like it? Go buy an Android device or a gazillion Windows machines.